SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Possibility of using quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) as an alternative energy source in the goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus) diet

Taşkın DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU
Pages
457–464
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results obtained in this study, quinoa grain can be successfully used in the goldfish ration without any negative effect on goldfish performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of using quinoa instead of 50(T2), 75(T3), and 100(T4) % of oat grain in goldfish rations on their performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ninety-six young goldfish, aged about 5 months were randomly divided into four similar groups, twenty-four goldfish in each group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results obtained in this study, quinoa grain can be successfully used in the goldfish ration without any negative effect on goldfish performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carassius aerates auratus · Chenopodium quinoa · energy source

Abstract

The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of using quinoa instead of 50(T2), 75(T3), and 100(T4) % of oat grain in goldfish rations on their performance. Ninety-six young goldfish, aged about 5 months were randomly divided into four similar groups, twenty-four goldfish in each group. The performances of goldfish were investigated by adding 0%, 50%, 75%, and 100% quinoa grains instead of oat grain in the feed (T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4), respectively. The Total live weight gains for fish fed by the T1, T2, T3, and T4 diets were 7.56±0.70, 7.48±0.38, 7.97±1.20, and 7.32±0.68 g day-1, respectively, during the trial. In this study, Insignificant (P>0.05) differences in specific growth rates (% / d) in experimental groups were observed during all experimental periods (60 days). The specific growth rates (%/d) were higher in goldfish fed with the T2 ration than in goldfish fed with T3 and T4 and T1 diets (2.88%, 11.03%, and 11.71%; P> 0.05), respectively. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the control group and the groups that received quinoa on body length, body height, head highs, or head widths. The performance of all goldfish fed quinoa rations showed as similar to goldfish fed by oat ration. Based on the results obtained in this study, quinoa grain can be successfully used in the goldfish ration without any negative effect on goldfish performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU, T. (2023). Possibility of using quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) as an alternative energy source in the goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus) diet. Journal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 457–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/947400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal Chem. Arlington, VA, USA. (73) 1: 189 – 191, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/73.1.189.
  2. Abo-Eid, H.A., Eisa, S.S., Abdel-Azeem, F., El-Borden, N.E. (2021). Effect of usıng varyıng levels of quınoa hay ın growıng rabbıt ratıons. Egyptian Journal of Rabbit Science, 31(1): 73-90. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejrs.2020.173281.
  3. Attwell, W.A., Patrick, B.M., Johnson, LA., Glass, R.W. (1983). Characterization of quinoa starch. Cereal Chem. 60, 9–11
  4. Aguilar, P.C., Jacobsen, SE. (2006). Cultivation of quinoa on the Peruvian altiplano. Food Rev Int 19(1–2):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018866
  5. Angeli, V., Silva, PM., Massuela, D.C., Khan, M.W., Hamar, A., Khajehei, F., Graef-Hönninger, S., Piatti, C. (2020). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): an overview of the potentials of the “golden grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods 9(2):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods 9020216 Bazile, D., Bertero, D., Nieto, C. (2015). State-of-the-art report on kinoa around the world in 2013, Oficina Regional de la FAO para América Latina y el Caribe, 250-266
  6. Bilalis, D., Kakabouki, I., Karkanis, A., Travlos, I., Triantafyllidis, V., Hela, D. (2012). Seed and saponin production of organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) for different tillage and fertilization. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 40(1):42–46. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4017400.
  7. Bilalis, D.J., Roussis, I., Kakabouk, I., Folina, A. (2019). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) crop under Mediterranean conditions: a review. Cienc Investig Agrar 46(2):51–68. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v46i2.215
  8. Cardozo, A., Tapia, M. (1979). Valor nutritivo. In: Tapia M., Gandarillos H., Alandia S., Cardozo A., Mujica A. Quinoa y kaniwa, cultivos Andinos. Bogota CIID, Oficina Rgiond para la america Lotina, pp. 149-192, ISBN: O-88936-200-9
  9. Cochran, W.G., Cox, G.M. (1957). In Experimental Designs. 22nd ed. Pp. xiv, 611. 82s. (John Wiley and Sons, New York; Chapman and Hall, London). https://doi.org/10.2307/3610494.
  10. De Santis, G.D., ’Ambrosio, T., Rinaldi, M., Rascio, A. (2016). Heritabilities of morphological and quality traits and interrelationships with yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes in the Mediterranean environment. J Cereal Sci 70:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.06.003.
  11. Didier, B., Cataldo, P., Alexis, V., Al-Nusairi Mohammad, S., Djibi, B., Joelle, B., Layth, H., Maarouf, I.M.,