SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Business / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON ORGANISATION-BASED PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP

ÖRGÜTE YÖNELİK PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENME OLGUSU ÜZERİNE NİTEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Nil MADİ
Dilek Işılay ÜÇOK
Pages
83–100
Publication Date
2023-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that organization-based psychological ownership can be used as a tool to increase job performance, productivity and foster extra-role behavior in organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychological ownership is a phenomenon in which people develop possessive feelings for a specific target without legal ownership.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to understand organization-based psychological ownership in-depth, whether it can be used as a tool to foster desired outcomes, and how employees perceive the concept and their observations at work perceived effects of COVID-19 pandemic on organization based psychological ownership.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that organization-based psychological ownership can be used as a tool to increase job performance, productivity and foster extra-role behavior in organizations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psikolojik sahiplenme · örgüte yönelik psikolojik sahiplenme · örgütsel davranış

Abstract

Psychological ownership is a phenomenon in which people develop possessive feelings for a specific target without legal ownership. It might be developed toward the organization or job itself in an organizational context. This study aims to understand organization-based psychological ownership in-depth, whether it can be used as a tool to foster desired outcomes, and how employees perceive the concept and their observations at work perceived effects of COVID-19 pandemic on organization based psychological ownership. Findings from in-depth interviews with 10 full-time employees in Turkey include definition, antecedents, and consequences of psychological ownership, possessions at work, perceived changes due to pandemic and management practices. The results show that organization-based psychological ownership can be used as a tool to increase job performance, productivity and foster extra-role behavior in organizations. This study intends to provide insight into Humans Resources and top management practices by listing the encouraging and discouraging factors related to psychological ownership.

Özet

Psikolojik sahiplenme, kişilerin yasal sahipliği olmadan belirli bir hedefe yönelik sahiplenme duygusu geliştirmesidir. Örgütsel bağlamda, örgüte veya işin kendisine yönelik olarak geliştirilebilmektedir. Bu çalışma, örgüte yönelik psikolojik sahiplenmeyi derinlemesine anlamayı, örgütlerde istenen sonuçları teşvik etmek için bir araç olarak kullanılıp kullanılamayacağını, çalışanların kavramı nasıl algıladıklarını ve işyerindeki gözlemlerini ve COVID-19 pandemisinin örgüte yönelik psikolojik sahiplenme üzerindeki algılanan etkisini anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye'de 10 tam zamanlı çalışanla yapılan derinlemesine görüşmelerden elde edilen bulgular, psikolojik sahipliğin tanımını, öncülleri ve sonuçları, çalışanların işyerinde sahip olduklarını hissettikleri varlıkları, COVID-19’a bağlı olarak algıladıkları değişiklikleri ve yönetim uygulamalarını içermektedir. Sonuçlar, örgüte yönelik psikolojik sahiplenmenin, örgütlerde iş performansını, üretkenliğini artırmak ve ekstra rol davranışlarını teşvik etmek için bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, psikolojik sahiplenme ile ilgili teşvik edici ve cesaret kırıcı faktörleri belirleyerek İnsan Kaynakları ve üst yönetim uygulamaları için içgörü sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MADİ, N., ÜÇOK, D. I. (2023). A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON ORGANISATION-BASED PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Journal of Research in Business, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 83–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/946274

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ağbay, N. C. & Akbudak, N. (2021). Understanding the perception of organizational commitment during covıd-19 pandemic: senior hotel managers' perspective. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 9(4), 2398-2415.
  2. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. R., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 173–191.
  3. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21–34.
  4. Aslan, M., & Ateşoğlu, H. (2020). Psikolojik sahiplenme ölçeğinin türkçe uyarlaması, güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışmaları. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 4184-4195.
  5. Baer, M., & Brown, G. (2012). Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 60–71.
  6. Bernhard, F., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees' work attitudes and behaviors. Group and Organization Management, 36(3), 345–384.
  7. Bordarie, J. & Grouille, R. (2022). Understanding the complex relationship between organizational psychological ownership and organisational citizenship behaviours during covid19 crisis. International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends, 120-124.
  8. Bullock, R. B. (2015). The Development of Job-Based Psychological Ownership. Seattle Pacific University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577-594.
  9. Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 318–338.
  10. Brown, G., & Robinson, S. L. (2011). Reactions to territorial infringement. Organization Science, 22(1), 210–224.
  11. Chi, N. W., & Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691–711.
  12. Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2015). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 163–183.
  13. Derin, N. (2018). Kuruma duyulan psikolo