SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Business / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

HOW IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERACTIONAL INJUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE SILENCE SHAPED? MEDIATOR EFFECT OF SELF-ESTEEM AND RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT PERCEPTION, MODERATOR EFFECT OF EQUITY SENSITIVITY

YÖNETİCİ ADALETSİZLİĞİ VE ÇALIŞAN SESSİZLİĞİ İLİŞKİSİ NASIL ŞEKİLLENİR? BENLİK SAYGISI VE ÇATIŞMA ALGISININ ARACILIK, ADALETE KARŞI DUYARLILIĞIN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Senay YÜRÜR
Hakkı Okan YELOĞLU
Pages
58–82
Publication Date
2023-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research conducted on 1037 employees working in various sectors such as banking, finance, insurance, automotive and informatics in Ankara, interactional injustice strengthens the relationship conflict perception of employees and silences them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is known that unfair practices and behaviors in organizations develop a climate of silence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results of the research conducted on 1037 employees working in various sectors such as banking, finance, insurance, automotive and informatics in Ankara, interactional injustice strengthens the relationship conflict perception of employees and silences them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are discussed in terms of theoretical contributions and relevant literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:etkileşim adaleti · benlik saygısı · savunmacı sessizlik

Abstract

It is known that unfair practices and behaviors in organizations develop a climate of silence. However, the question of which psychological or cognitive processes play a role in this relationship still seems to need to be answered. Therefore, understanding how the relationship between interactional injustice and defensive silence is shaped is the main purpose of this study. For this purpose, the mediating role of self-esteem and conflict perceptions of employees in the relationship between interactional justice and defensive silence, and the moderating role of employees' sensitivity to justice were investigated. According to the results of the research conducted on 1037 employees working in various sectors such as banking, finance, insurance, automotive and informatics in Ankara, interactional injustice strengthens the relationship conflict perception of employees and silences them. In addition, the effect of interactional injustice on employees' self-esteem and on relationship conflict perception varies according to the level of equity sensitivity of employees. The results are discussed in terms of theoretical contributions and relevant literature.

Özet

Örgütlerdeki adaletsiz uygulama ve davranışların sessizlik iklimini geliştirdiği bilinmektedir. Ancak adaletsizlik hangi psikolojik ya da bilişsel süreçlerle bireyde sessizliğe neden olmaktadır sorusu hala yanıtlanmaya muhtaç görünmektedir. Bu nedenle etkileşim adaletsizliği ile savunmacı sessizlik arasındaki ilişkinin nasıl şekillendiğini anlamak bu araştırmanın temel amacıdır. Bu amaçla etkileşim adaleti ve savunmacı sessizlik ilişkisinde çalışanların benlik saygıları ve çatışma algılarının aracılık rolü ve çalışanların adalete karşı duyarlılık düzeylerinin bu ilişkiyi düzenleyici rolü araştırılmıştır. Ankara’da bankacılık, finans, sigortacılık, otomotiv ve bilişim gibi farklı sektörlerde çalışan 1037 kişi üzerinde yürütülen araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre yöneticilerinin adaletsizliği çalışanların çatışma algısını güçlendirerek onları sessizleştirmektedir. Buna ek olarak yönetici adaletsizliğinin çalışanların benlik saygısı ve bireylerarası çatışma algıları üzerindeki etkisi, çalışanların adalete karşı duyarlılık düzeylerine göre değişmektedir. Araştırmanın diğer bulguları ve ilgili yazın açısından anlamı değerlendirme ve sonuç bölümünde tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜRÜR, S., YELOĞLU, H. O. (2023). HOW IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERACTIONAL INJUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE SILENCE SHAPED? MEDIATOR EFFECT OF SELF-ESTEEM AND RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT PERCEPTION, MODERATOR EFFECT OF EQUITY SENSITIVITY. Journal of Research in Business, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 58–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/946273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
  2. Allen, R. S. & White, C. S. (2002). Equity sensitivity theory: A test of responses to two types of under-reward situations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(4), 435-451.
  3. Aryee, S. & Chen, Z. X. (2004). Countering the trend towards careerist orientation in the age of downsizing: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 321-328.
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I. & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, ınterpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?. Psychological Science in The Public Interest, 4(1), 1-44.
  5. Bellou, V., Chitiris, L. & Bellou, A. (2005). The impact of organizational ıdentification and self-esteem on organizational citizenship behavior: The case of greek public hospitals. Operational Research, 5(2), 305-318.
  6. Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Ed.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations (pp. 43-55),
  7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  8. Blader, S. L. & Tyler, T. R. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness?. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Ed.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 329-354). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc. Publishers.
  9. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Brown, J. D. & Marshall, M. A. (2006). The Three faces of self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Self-Esteem: Issues and answers (pp. 4-9). New York: Psychology Press.
  10. Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R. & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912–922.
  11. Carson, K. D., Carson, P. P., Lanford, H. & Roe, C. W. (1997). The effects of organization-based self-esteem on workplace outcomes: An examination of emergency medical technicians. Public Personnel Management, 26(1), 139-155.
  12. Chamberlin, M., Newton, D.W. & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and ıts promotive and prohibitive forms: ıdentification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11-71.
  13. Charles, J., Francis, F. & Zirra, C. T. O. (2021). Effect of employee ınvolvement in decision making and organization productivity. Archives of Business Research (ABR), 9(3), 28-34.
  14. Clark, L. A.,