SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Development of the Workplace Work Environment Ergonomics Scale for Nurses

Ali AĞAR
Soner BERŞE
Ezgi DİRGAR
Pages
251–260
Publication Date
2023-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future research should aim to verify the scale's applicability in different countries and healthcare settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to design and validate a comprehensive scale to assess ergonomic risks in the work environment for nurses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The development process involved expert opinions for content validity and a pilot study for surface validity, leading to a 32-item draft.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future research should aim to verify the scale's applicability in different countries and healthcare settings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ergonomics · Ergonomics Scale · Nursing

Abstract

This study aimed to design and validate a comprehensive scale to assess ergonomic risks in the work environment for nurses. The instrument includes five subscales: Work Area Ergonomic Risks, Occupational Health and Safety, Ergonomic Risks Related to Medical Devices, Cognitive Ergonomic Risks, and Environmental Ergonomic Risks. The development process involved expert opinions for content validity and a pilot study for surface validity, leading to a 32-item draft. An exploratory factor analysis revealed a 5-factor structure, explaining 77.804% of total variance. Items with factor loadings below 0.30 were removed, resulting in a final 28-item scale. The Cronbach's alpha for the scale was found to be 0.922, indicating high internal consistency. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis also confirmed the 5-factor structure. These findings suggest that the Workplace Ergonomics Scale for Nurses is a valid and reliable tool that can aid in identifying ergonomic risks in nursing work environments. By using this instrument, healthcare organizations can implement targeted strategies to improve workplace conditions and enhance the well-being of their nursing staff. Future research should aim to verify the scale's applicability in different countries and healthcare settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞAR, A., BERŞE, S., DİRGAR, E. (2023). Development of the Workplace Work Environment Ergonomics Scale for Nurses. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 251–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/946141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AlHazim, S. S., Al-Otaibi, S. T., & Herzallah, N. H. (2022).
  2. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Ergonomic Hazards Among Healthcare Workers in a Saudi Government Hospital. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 1771-1778.
  3. Apple, B., & Letvak, S. (2021). Ergonomic Challenges in the Perioperative Setting. AORN Journal, 113(4), 339-348.
  4. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press.
  5. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7. Karakoç, A. G. D. F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Fundamental Principles in Scale Development Studies. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 13(40), 39-49.
  6. Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  7. Mokarami, H., Eskandari, S., Cousins, R., Salesi, M., Kazemi, R., Razeghi, M., & Choobineh, A. (2021). Development and Validation of a Nurse Station Ergonomics Assessment (NSEA) Tool. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-12.
  8. Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T. H., Hoang, D. L., Hoang, T. G., & Pham, M. K. (2022). Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent Musculoskeletal Disorders Among District Hospital Nurses in Vietnam. BioMed Research International, 2022.
  9. Polat, F., Boz, D., Çetindere, F. A., & Duran, C. (2021).
  10. Workplace Ergonomics Scale. Seçer, İ. (2013). Practical Data Analysis with SPSS and LISREL: Analysis and Reporting. Soler-Font, M., Ramada, J. M., van Zon, S. K., Almansa, J., Bültmann, U., Serra, C., & ISR Team (2019). Multifaceted Intervention for the Prevention and Management of Musculoskeletal Pain in Nursing Staff: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One, 14(11), e0225198. Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Development of Psychology and Measurement Tool in Education. Istanbul: Nobel Publishing. Şencan, H. (2005). Reliability and Validity in Social and Behavioral Measurements. Ankara:
  11. Seçkin Publishing. Webster, C. S., & Weller, J. M. (2021). Data Visualization and Cognitive Ergonomics in Anaesthesia and Healthcare. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 126(5), 913-915.
  12. Webster, C. S., & Weller, J. M. (2021). Data Visualization and Cognitive Ergonomics in Anaesthesia and Healthcare. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 126(5), 913-915.
  13. Westergren, E., Ludvigsen, M. S., & Lindberg, M. (2020). Associations Between Mater