Journals / Dünya Sağlık ve Tabiat Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Zooplankton of Karasu River (Türkiye)

Karasu Nehri (Türkiye) Zooplanktonu

Pages
40–51
Publication Date
2023-06-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While increases were observed in zooplankton density and individual numbers in the spring, summer and early autumn months, decreases were observed in the number of zooplankton species and individuals in winter months

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, species identifications were made by monthly on-site measurements (Temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH,) and taking zooplankton samples from the sampling points determined on the Karasu River between January 2019 and December 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 49 zooplankton species were identified in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While increases were observed in zooplankton density and individual numbers in the spring, summer and early autumn months, decreases were observed in the number of zooplankton species and individuals in winter months
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Zooplankton · Rotifera · Cladocera

Abstract

In this research, species identifications were made by monthly on-site measurements (Temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH,) and taking zooplankton samples from the sampling points determined on the Karasu River between January 2019 and December 2019. A total of 49 zooplankton species were identified in the study. Among these species, 35 species of Rotifera, 11 species of Cladocera and 3 species of Copepoda. Species belonging to Rotifera constituted 71.4% of the total zooplankton, 22.5% of Cladocera and 6.1% of Copepoda. During the research, zooplankton species were recorded every month. While increases were observed in zooplankton density and individual numbers in the spring, summer and early autumn months, decreases were observed in the number of zooplankton species and individuals in winter months

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Ocak 2019 ile Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında Karasu Nehri üzerinde belirlenen örnekleme noktalarından aylık olarak yerinde ölçümler (Sıcaklık, çözünmüş oksijen, pH,) yapılarak ve zooplankton örnekleri alınarak tür teşhisleri yapılmıştır. Çalışmada toplam 49 zooplankton türü teşhis edilmiştir. Bu türlerden 35 tür Rotifera, 11 tür Cladocera ve 3 tür Copepoda grubundandır. Rotifera’ya ait olan türler toplam zooplanktonun %71,4, Cladocera %22,5 ve Copepoda %6,1’lik kısmını oluşturmuşlardır. Araştırma süresince her ay zooplankton türleri kaydedilmiştir. İlkbahar, yaz ve sonbahar aylarının başlarında zooplankton yoğunluğu ve birey sayılarında artışlar gözlenirken kış aylarında zooplankton tür ve birey sayılarında azalmalar kaydedilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALER, S., KARAKAYA, G. (2023). Zooplankton of Karasu River (Türkiye). Dünya Sağlık ve Tabiat Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 40–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/945600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acharya, K. Jack, J. D., & Bucaveckas, P. A. (2005). Dietary effects on life history traits of riverine bosmina. Freshwater Biology, 50, 965. Akbulut, N., & Yıldız, K., (2005). The Rotifera fauna of Euphrates River Basin (Turkey). Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 34, 93-105.
  2. Balık, S., Ustaoglu, M. R., & Sarı, H. M. (1999). Kuzey Ege Bölgesi’ndeki akarsuların faunası üzerine ilk gözlemler. Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 16(3-4), 289-299.
  3. Baloch, W. A., Jafri, S. I. H., & Soomro, A. N. (2005). Spring zooplankton composition of Rawal Lake, Islamabad. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series), 37, 41-36.
  4. Bekleyen, A., Gokot, B., & Varol, M. (2011). Thirty-four new records and the diversity of the Rotifera in the Turkish part of the Tigris River watershed, with remarks on biogeographically interesting taxa. Sci Res Essays, 6(30), 6270-6284. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.355
  5. Berzins, B., & Pejler, B. (1987). Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH. Hydrobiologia, 147, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0002573
  6. Borutsky, E. V. (1964). Fauna of U.S.S.R: Crustacea. freshwater harpacticoida. Israel Program for Scientific Translations Limited. Bozkurt, A. (2004). Akdeniz Bölgesindeki bazı akarsuların zooplankton (rotifer, kladoser ve kopepod) faunası üzerine ilk gözlemler. Türk Sucul Yaşam Dergisi, 2(3), 65-70.
  7. Bozkurt, A., Göksu, M.Z.L., Sarıhan, E., & Taşdemir, M. (2002). Asi Nehri rotifer faunası (Hatay-Türkiye). E.U. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 19(1-2), 63-67
  8. Bulut, H., & Saler, S. (2014). Zooplankton variation of Murat River (Elazığ-within the borders Palu district). Turk J Agriculture and Food Sci Tech, 2(1), 13-17.
  9. Bulut, H., & Saler. S. (2021, December 15-16). Zooplankton of Zıkkım Stream (Elazıg) [Conference presentation]. 6th Asia Pacific International Modern Sciences Congress, Delhi, India. Bulut, H., & Saler. S. (2019). Effect of physicochemical parameters on zooplankton at a freshwater body of Euphrates Basin (Elazıg-Turkey). Cellular and Molecular Biology, 65(1), 8-13
  10. Can, F., & Bozkurt, A. (2022). Determination of zooplankton fauna in the running waters of Arsuz District of Hatay province. Marine and Life Sciences, 4(2), 123-136.
  11. Chang, K. H., Doi, H., Imai, H., Gunji, F., & Nakano, S. (2008). Longitudinal changes in zooplankton distribution below a reservoir outfall with reference to river planktivory. Limnology, 9, 125-133.
  12. Damian-Georgescu, A. (1970).
  13. Fauna republicii socialiste Romania, Crustacea, IV. 11 Copepoda. Harpacticoida. B