Furthermore, in this study, it is proven that lies in the 3rd.type successor plane, lies in the 1st type successor plane and by defining the involute-evolute S-pair, the distance between the corresponding points of these curves is found.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, the successor formulae of the successor curves defined by Menninger [1] are given.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, by defining the successor planes, the geometric meanings of the successor curvatures are investigated and the relations across the components of the position vectors of successor curves are found.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, in this study, it is proven that lies in the 3rd.type successor plane, lies in the 1st type successor plane and by defining the involute-evolute S-pair, the distance between the corresponding points of these curves is found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Successor frame · Successor curves · Slant helix
Abstract
In the present study, the successor formulae of the successor curves defined by Menninger [1] are given. Then, by defining the successor planes, the geometric meanings of the successor curvatures are investigated and the relations across the components of the position vectors of successor curves are found. Furthermore, in this study, it is proven that lies in the 3rd.type successor plane, lies in the 1st type successor plane and by defining the involute-evolute S-pair, the distance between the corresponding points of these curves is found.
MASAL, M. (2018). Curves According to the Successor Frame in Euclidean 3-Space. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 6, 1868–1873. https://ajindex.com/articles/942114
Menninger, A. (2014) Characterization of the slant helix as successor curves of the general helix. International Electronic Journal of Geometry, 7(2):84-91.
Ali, A.T. (2011) Position vectors of general helices in Euclidean 3-space. Bull. Math. Analy. Appl. 3 (2): 198-205.
Bertrand, J. (1850) La theories de courbes a double courbure. J. Math. Pures et Appl. 15: 332-350.
Do Carmo, M.P. (1976) Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Fuchs, D. (2013) Evolutes and involutes of spatial curves. Amer. Math. Monthly, 120(3):217-231.
Izumiya, S. & Takeuchi, N. (2002) Generic properties of helices and Bertand curves. J. Geom., 71(1): 97-109.
Liu, H. & Wang F., (2008) Mannheim partner curves in 3-space. J. Geom., 88: 120-126.
Lucas, P. & Ortega-Yagues, J.A.,(2012) Bertrand curves in the three-dimensional sphere. J. Geom. Phys., 62(9): 1903-1914.
Orbay, K. & Kasap, E. (2009) On Mannheim partner curves in. Int. J. Phys. Sci., 4(5): 261-264.
Struik, D.J. (1988) Lectures on classical differential geometry. Dover, New-York. Bektaş, Ö. & Yüce, S. (2013) Special involute-evolute partner D-curves in. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 6(1):20-29.
Bükcü, B. & Karacan, M.K. (2009) The slant helices according to Bishop frame,.World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 59:1039-1042.
Yılmaz, S. & Turgut, M. (2010) A new version of Bishop frame and application to spherical images. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 371: 764-776.