Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3

Experimental 70% Hepatectomy Model: Apoptotic Index, Proliferative Index and Mitotic Index

Pages
788–799
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Relative liver weight that determined each of experimentally groups were statistically significant differences compared to the control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Liver regeneration is known to begin after experimentally induced liver resection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At first 24-48 hours, DNA synthesis reaches the maximum level after resection and significantly regeneration known to occur on the first 10 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Relative liver weight that determined each of experimentally groups were statistically significant differences compared to the control group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Partial hepatectomy · TUNEL · Apotosis

Abstract

Liver regeneration is known to begin after experimentally induced liver resection. At first 24-48 hours, DNA synthesis reaches the maximum level after resection and significantly regeneration known to occur on the first 10 days. In this study, we was examined the regeneration of liver on the 1st and 14th days after the resection. In experiment 21 Wistar albino male rats were used. The rats were randomly divided into three groups. All experimentally groups realized midline incision with laparotomy for resection of liver. Pedicles of the left lateral and median lobes of the liver were applied 70% hepatectomy by 4/0 silk binding. At the end of 1st and 14th days, liver tissue removed for light misroscobic analysis. The tissue of all experimentally groups were showed some histopatological changes such as sinuzoidal dilatation, vacuolization in the hepatocytes. This histopatological findings were seem to increase at II. grup more than experimentally groups. Mitotic index, apoptotic index and proliferation index of values at II. group was reached the maximum level. Other group (III) dramatically reduced the value of these index and were seem to reach near to values of the control group. Relative liver weight that determined each of experimentally groups were statistically significant differences compared to the control group.

🔖

Cite This Article

İRKİN, L. C., ÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2021). Experimental 70% Hepatectomy Model: Apoptotic Index, Proliferative Index and Mitotic Index. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 788–799. https://ajindex.com/articles/941806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. A. Aktümsek, “Anatomi ve fizyoloji insan biyolojisi,” Nobel Yayınları, Ankara, 3th edt, pp. 366-7, 2006
  2. T. E. Andreoli, “Liver,” In M. B. Fallon, B. M. McGuire, G. A. Abrams, M. R. Arguedas (ed), Cecil essentials of medicine, 5th edt. WB Saunders Company, Philadelpia, pp. 365-98, 2001
  3. N. Fausto, “Liver regeneration,” Journal of Hepatol, vol. 32, pp. 19-31, 2000
  4. M. Basoglu, A. A. Balık, R. Kavak, C. Gundogdu, Z. Erman, R. Yıldırgan, D. Oren, “Effects of growth hormone on hepatic regeneration,” Turk J Med Sci., vol. 30, pp. 529-34, 2000
  5. Z. G. Ren, J. D. Zhao, K. Gu, J. Wang, G. L. Jiang, “Hepatic proliferation after partial liver irradiation in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Mol. Biol. Rep., vol. 39, pp. 3829-36, 2012
  6. E. A. Pomfret, J. J. Pomposelli, F. D. Gordon, N. Erbay, L. Lyn, W. D. Lewis, “Liver regeneration and surgical outcome in donors of right-lobe liver grafts,” Transplantation, vol. 76, pp. 5-10, 2003
  7. T. Nakamura, S. Mizuno, “The discovery of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its significance for cell biology, life sciences and clinical medicine,” Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci., vol. 86, no:6, pp. 588-610, 2010
  8. S. Perek, S. Kapan, “Cerrahi Gastroenteroloji,” In U. Değerli, Y. Bozfakıoğlu (ed), İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, vol. 5, pp. 194-208, 2000
  9. G. Garcea, G. J. Maddern, “Liver failure after major hepatic resection,” J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg., vol. 16, pp. 145-155, 2009
  10. G. K. Michalopoulos, M. C. DeFrances, “Liver regeneration”, Science, vol. 296, pp. 60-6, 1996
  11. L. Chen, H. L. Sun, L. Yang, H. J. Du, W. An, “Transfection of human hepatic stimulator substance gene could protect BEL-7402 cells against hepatotoxins,” Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi., vol. 12, no:2, pp. 99-101, 2004
  12. H. Y. Hsu, M. C. Yu, C. W. Lee, “RAM score is an effective predictor for early mortality and recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 17, no:1, pp. 742, 2017
  13. S. Iwatsuki, B. W. Shaw, T. E. Jr Starzi, “Experience with 150 liver resections,” Ann Surg.,vol. 197, pp. 247-52, 1983
  14. Canbek, M. Uyanoglu, S. Canbek, E. Ceyhan, A. Ozen, B. Durmus, O Turgak, “The effect of geraniol on liver regeneration after hepatectomy in rats,” In Vivo, vol. 31, no: 2, pp. 209-213, 2017
  15. M. Bouattour, E. Raymond, S. Qin, A. L. Cheng, U. Stammberger, G. Locatelli, S. Faivre, “Recent developments of c-Met as a therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 67, n