SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3

Comparison of Two Different Circular Diaphragm Models with Central Mass for MEMS Based FPI Pressure Sensor Performance Based on Sensitivity and Frequency Response

Fikret YILDIZ
Pages
619–628
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it was noted that M1 structure shows higher sensitivity and displacement compared to M2.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The sensitivity and the fundamental frequency of membrane with central mass (embossment) were analytically evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two different previously developed model (named as M1 and M2) of center embossment diaphragm were considered to obtain results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it was noted that M1 structure shows higher sensitivity and displacement compared to M2.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:central embossment · FPI pressure sensor · MEMS

Abstract

The sensitivity and the fundamental frequency of membrane with central mass (embossment) were analytically evaluated. Two different previously developed model (named as M1 and M2) of center embossment diaphragm were considered to obtain results. According to the results, it was noted that M1 structure shows higher sensitivity and displacement compared to M2. On the other hand, M2 structure provide more linearity on central deformation of membrane from applied pressure due to smaller displacement M1 counterpart. Moreover, frequency response of two structure is different for thinner embossment; however, this difference reduces for thicker embossment. As a result, the non-uniform structure of M2 model shows more flexibility on designing the sensors due to more geometrical parameters and provide more deformation linearity for effective detection of pressure. It was understand that compared with the conventional circular diaphragm (CD) structure used by Fabry-Perot interferometers (FPI) sensors, non-uniform structure provides extra geometrical parameters to tune the device performance and resulting in an enhanced design flexibility of the sensor structure.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, F. (2021). Comparison of Two Different Circular Diaphragm Models with Central Mass for MEMS Based FPI Pressure Sensor Performance Based on Sensitivity and Frequency Response. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 619–628. https://ajindex.com/articles/941790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. A. P. Jathoul et al., “Deep in vivo photoacoustic imaging of mammalian tissues using a tyrosinase-based genetic reporter,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 239–246, 2015
  2. J. Zhu, L. Ren, S. C. Ho, Z. Jia, and G. Song, “Gas pipeline leakage detection based on PZT sensors,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 26, no. 2, 2017
  3. X. Qi et al., “Fiber Optic Fabry-Perot Pressure Sensor with Embedded MEMS Micro-Cavity for Ultra-High Pressure Detection,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2719–2725, 2019
  4. H. F. Zhang, K. Maslov, G. Stoica, and L. V. Wang, “Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 848–851, 2006
  5. W. Ni et al., “Ultrathin graphene diaphragm-based extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometer for ultra-wideband fiber optic acoustic sensing,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 16, p. 20758, 2018
  6. J. Liu et al., “Fiber-optic Fabry–Perot pressure sensor based on low-temperature co-fired ceramic technology for hightemperature applications,” Appl. Opt., vol. 57, no. 15, p. 4211, 2018
  7. B. Liang et al., “Highly Sensitive, Flexible MEMS Based Pressure Sensor with Photoresist Insulation Layer,” Small, vol. 13, no. 44, pp. 1–7, 2017
  8. I. Padron, A. T. Fiory, and N. M. Ravindra, “Modeling and design of an embossed diaphragm fabry-perot pressure Sensor,” Mater. Sci. Technol. Conf. Exhib. MS T’08, vol. 2, no. October 2017, pp. 992–997, 2008
  9. C. Liao et al., “Sub-micron silica diaphragm-based fiber-tip Fabry–Perot interferometer for pressure measurement,” Opt. Lett., vol. 39, no. 10, p. 2827, 2014
  10. Y. Zhang, L. Yuan, X. Lan, A. Kaur, J. Huang, and H. Xiao, “High-temperature fiber-optic Fabry–Perot interferometric pressure sensor fabricated by femtosecond laser,” Opt. Lett., vol. 38, no. 22, p. 4609, 2013
  11. F. Xu et al., “High-sensitivity Fabry–Perot interferometric pressure sensor based on a nanothick silver diaphragm,” Opt. Lett., vol. 37, no. 2, p. 133, 2012
  12. Z. Li et al., “Highly-sensitive gas pressure sensor using twin-core fiber based in-line Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” Opt. Express, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 6673, 2015
  13. S. J. Mihailov, D. Grobnic, C. W. Smelser, P. Lu, R. B. Walker, and H. Ding, “Bragg grating inscription in various optical fibers with femtosecond infrared lasers and a phase mask,” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 754, 2011
  14. S. Liu et al., “Nano silica diaphragm infiber cavity for gas pressure measurement,” Sci. Rep.,