SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4

Antivirus Mask Selection Under Spherical Fuzzy Information

Serhat AYDIN
Emrah KÖKSALMIŞ
Pages
1037–1048
Publication Date
2021-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the best antivirus mask is determined for public use and we present the advantages of the proposed method in results section.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many individuals are facing antivirus mask scarcity with the exponential spread of COVID-19.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we determine 4 different alternatives and 4 criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the best antivirus mask is determined for public use and we present the advantages of the proposed method in results section.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mask selection · spherical fuzzy sets · spherical AHP

Abstract

Many individuals are facing antivirus mask scarcity with the exponential spread of COVID-19. A functional antivirus mask needs to be selected and made usable for everyone. Selection mask problem contains qualitative criteria, therefore utilizing fuzzy logic for this problem is a useful approach. To optimize the efficiency of choosing antivirus masks, we propose to use one of the new types of ordinary fuzzy sets, named Spherical fuzzy sets. For this purpose, we determine 4 different alternatives and 4 criteria. Then, we gather the data under spherical information and applied the Spherical fuzzy AHP method to the problem. Then, we propose an entropy based Spherical fuzzy AHP method. We compare the results of Spherical fuzzy AHP method, and an entropy based Spherical fuzzy AHP method. Moreover, we present a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how our model is sensitive to changes in weights of criteria. Finally, the best antivirus mask is determined for public use and we present the advantages of the proposed method in results section.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, S., KÖKSALMIŞ, E. (2021). Antivirus Mask Selection Under Spherical Fuzzy Information. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 1037–1048. https://ajindex.com/articles/941785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. D. Cucinotta, and M. Vanelli, “WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic”, Acta Biomed, vol. 91 no.1, pp 57-160, 2020. [2] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51235105. Access date: 31.01.2021
  2. B. W. Schuller, D. M. Schuller, K. Qian, J. Liu, H. Zheng, X. Li, “Covid-19 and computer audition: An overview on what speech and sound analysis could contribute in the sars-Cov-2 corona crisis”, ArXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11117, 2020 [4] https://www.who.int/health topics/coronavirus. Access date: 31.01.2021
  3. General Secretariat for National Defence “National plan for the prevention and control of influenza pandemic”, General Secretariat for National Defence Report Plan, Paris, pp.1-78, 2007
  4. The Department of Health and Ageing, “Australian health management plan for pandemic influenza: important information for all Australians”, Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Health Management Plan, Australia, pp. 1-232, 2006
  5. United States Department of Health and Human Services, “Department of health and human services”, HHS pandemic influenza plan. Washington, pp.1-396, 2005
  6. C.R. MacIntyre, S. Cauchemez, D.E. Dwyer, H. Seale, P. Cheung, G. Browne, M. Fasher, J. Wood, Z. Gao, R. Booy, N. Ferguson, “Face mask use and control of respiratory virus transmission in households”, Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no.2, pp 233–41, 2009
  7. N.C.J. Brienen, A. Timen, J. Wallinga, J.E. Van Steenbergen, P.F.M. Teunis, “The effect of mask use on the spread of influenza during a pandemic”, Risk Anal, vol. 30 no. 8, pp. 1210–8, 2009
  8. L.A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, In Fuzzy sets, Fuzzy logic, and Fuzzy systems, vol. 6, pp. 394-432, 1996
  9. K. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, International Journal Bioautomation, vol. 20, no. 1, 2016
  10. R.R. Yager,, “Pythagorean fuzzy subsets”. In 2013 Joint Ifsa World Congress and Nafips Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, pp. 57-61, 2013
  11. R.R. Yager, “Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1222-1230, 2016
  12. F. Kutlu Gündoğdu, C. Kahraman, “Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method”, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 36, no.1, pp. 337-352, 2019
  13. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw- Hill, New York pp.78-99, 1980
  14. T.L. Saaty, “Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process” (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh: RWS publications, 1996
  15. G.H. Tzeng, J.J. Huang, "Multiple Attribute Dec