Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2022 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 6

Investigation of Pharmaceuticals in Sakarya Sewage Wastewater

Pages
1209–1223
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of these findings, advanced treatment units such as high-pressure membrane systems (including ozonizing, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis) can help adsorption rates at the treatment plant, increasing removal efficiency regarding drug compounds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Active substances of drugs can cause various adverse effects by accumulating in the ecosystem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study focuses on 13 different pharmaceutical compounds belonging to drug classes of anti-depressants, antiepileptic’s, anti-inflammatories, beta-blockers, lidocaine, and stimulants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of these findings, advanced treatment units such as high-pressure membrane systems (including ozonizing, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis) can help adsorption rates at the treatment plant, increasing removal efficiency regarding drug compounds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:pharmacceuticals compounds · sewage wastewater · treatment

Abstract

Active substances of drugs can cause various adverse effects by accumulating in the ecosystem. Many medications are resistant to biodegradation, given the recipient media in conventional wastewater treatment plants, and are thus released into the environment after only partial purification or no purification at all. The study focuses on 13 different pharmaceutical compounds belonging to drug classes of anti-depressants, antiepileptic’s, anti-inflammatories, beta-blockers, lidocaine, and stimulants. These compounds were selected with reference to the literature as the ones most commonly encountered in domestic wastewater, surface, and groundwater. The presence of these compounds in the wastewater samples from Sakarya sewage and wastewater treatment plant was investigated. For this purpose, composite samples were taken at various sampling points, and duly analyzed. The analysis revealed the presence of the pharmaceutical residues in the sewage waters from Sakarya Municipality. Some of them were still present in the effluent of the treatment plant. On the other hand, fluoxetine, propranolol, and metoprolol drug active ingredients were not detected at any sampling point. Among all the compounds examined, the highest percentage of residues were observed in the case of active caffeine and paracetamol. In the light of these findings, advanced treatment units such as high-pressure membrane systems (including ozonizing, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis) can help adsorption rates at the treatment plant, increasing removal efficiency regarding drug compounds.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERT, B. K., YILMAZ, C., ÖZENGİN, N. (2022). Investigation of Pharmaceuticals in Sakarya Sewage Wastewater. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 6, 1209–1223. https://ajindex.com/articles/941689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. R. R. Z. Tarpani, A. Azapagic “Life cycle environmental impacts of advanced wastewater treatment techniques for removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs),” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 215, pp. 258-272, June 2018
  2. C. Morosini, E. Postè, M. Mostachetti, Vincenzo Torretta, “Pharmaceuticals in water cycle: a review on risk assessment and wastewater and sludge treatment,” Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, Vol.19, No. 8, 1339-1378, August 2020
  3. P. K. Mutiyar, S. K. Gupta, A. K. Mittal, “Fate of pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) from River Yamuna, India: An ecotoxicological risk assessment approach,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 150, pp. 297-304, 15 April 2018
  4. C. G. Daughton, T. A. Ternes, “Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 107, pp 907–938, 6 December 1999
  5. G. Knopp, C. Prasse, T. A. Ternes, P. Corne, “ Elimination of micropollutants and transformation products from wastewater treatment plant effluent through pilot scale ozonation followed by various activated carbon and biological filters,” Water Research, vol. 100, pp. 580-592, 1 September 2016
  6. C. Dai, S. Li, Y. Duan, K. H. Leong, Y. Tu, L. Zhou, “Human health risk assessment of selected pharmaceuticals in the five major river basins, China,” Science of The Total Environment, 801, 149730, 2021
  7. Q. Sui, J. Huang, S. Deng, G. Yu, Q. Fan, “Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals, caffeine and DEET in wastewater treatment plants of Beijing, China,” Water Research, vol. 44, pp. 417–426, 2010
  8. B. Subedi, N. Codru, D. M. Dziewulski, L. R. Wilson, J. Xue, S. Yun, K. Kannan, “A pilot study on the assessment of trace organic contaminants including pharmaceuticals and personal care products from on-site wastewater treatment systems along Skaneateles Lake in New York State, USA,” Water Research, vol.72, pp.28-39, 2015
  9. B. Subedi, K. Balakrishna, D. I. Joshua, K. Kannan, “Mass loading and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products including psychoactives, antihypertensives, and antibiotics in two sewage treatment plants in southern India,” Chemosphere, vol. 167, pp. 429-437, January 2017
  10. A. J. Ebele, M. A. E. Abdallah, S. Harrad,” Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment,” Emerging Contaminants, vol 3(1), p.p1-16., 2017
  11. Holm, M. Bakken, O. Vangen, R.