Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2

T1 relaxation time in the evaluation of liver fibrosis; with native MR relaxometry

Pages
197–202
Publication Date
2023-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, this method can be used to measure liver T1 relaxation time in patients with liver fibrosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Non-invasive methods have been investigated as an alternative to biopsy in assessing liver fibrosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between liver T1 relaxation time and liver fibrosis as a non-invasive alternative method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, this method can be used to measure liver T1 relaxation time in patients with liver fibrosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fibrosis · Liver · MRI

Abstract

Objective: Non-invasive methods have been investigated as an alternative to biopsy in assessing liver fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between liver T1 relaxation time and liver fibrosis as a non-invasive alternative method. Patients and Methods: This study analyzed 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) images of 86 patients retrospectively. The participants were divided into two groups: patients with chronic hepatitis and the control group. Native variable flip angle (VFA) T1 mapping technique was used to estimate liver T1 relaxation time. T1 mapping sequence, T2* mapping sequence, and image analysis were performed. The liver size, the spleen size, the liver T1 relaxation time, and the liver T2* relaxation time were recorded. Results: The T1 relaxation time was 758.4 ± 121.1 ms in the chronic hepatitis group and 600.2 ± 67 ms in the control group. The T1 relaxation time of the patient group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.001). The spleen size of the patient group was statistically significantly larger than the control group (p<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between liver T1 relaxation time and Ishak score (r=0.683, p<0.001). Also, a significant positive correlation was observed between T1 relaxation time and histological activity index score (r=0.542, p<0.001). Conclusion: A native T1 map is a non-invasive method that works as an alternative to biopsy in the follow-up and diagnosis of chronic hepatitis. Moreover, this method can be used to measure liver T1 relaxation time in patients with liver fibrosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIALTIN, F., YIGIT, H., ERGUN, E., KOSAR, P. N. (2023). T1 relaxation time in the evaluation of liver fibrosis; with native MR relaxometry. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2, 197–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/941424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020
  2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.060 [2] Tanwar S, Rhodes F, Srivastava A, Trembling PM, Rosenberg WM. Inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol 2020
  3. doi:10.3748/wjg. v26.i2.109 [3] Sripongpun P, Pongpaibul A, Charatcharoenwitthaya P. Value and risk of percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with cirrhosis and clinical suspicion of autoimmune hepatitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021
  4. e000701. doi:10.1136/ bmjgast-2021-000701 [4] Mulazzani L Terzi E, Casadei G, et al. Retrospective analysis of safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in the 21st century. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021
  5. 33(1S Suppl 1):e355-e362. doi:10.1097/MEG.000.000.0000002080 [5] Mathew RP, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of hepatic fibrosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2018
  6. doi:10.1007/s11894.018.0652-7 [6] Hoffman DH, Ayoola A, Nickel D, et al. MR elastography, T1 and T2 relaxometry of liver: role in noninvasive assessment of liver function and portal hypertension. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020
  7. doi:10.1007/s00261.020.02432-7 [7] Carneiro AAO, Vilela GR, De Araujo DB, Baffa O. MRI relaxometry: methods and applications. Brazilian journal of physics 2006
  8. doi: doi.org/10.1590/ S0103.973.3200600.010.0005 [8] Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, et al. Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J 2001
  9. doi:10.1053/ euhj.2001.2822 [9] Henninger B, Kremser C, Rauch S, et al. Evaluation of MR imaging with T1 and T2* mapping for the determination of hepatic iron overload. Eur Radiol 2012
  10. doi:10.1007/s00330.012.2506-2 [10] Iles L, Pfluger H, Phrommintikul A, et al. Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008
  11. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.049 [11] Schabel MC, Morrell GR. Uncertainty in T(1) mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles. Phys Med Biol 2009
  12. N1-N8. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N01 [12] Ding Y, Rao SX, Zhu T, Chen CZ, Li RC, Zeng MS. Liver fibrosis staging using T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared with DW imaging. Clin Radiol 2015
  13. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.014 [13] Li Z, Sun J, Hu X, et al