Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2006 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

İLKÖĞRETİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FEN BİLGİSİ DERSİNE BAKIŞ AÇILARINI BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pages
339–346
Publication Date
2006-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also stated that the level of the students attending to the schools in the city center is higher than the ones in the out skirt

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The opinions of the students for the science are related to meet their needs and expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was applied to the 321 students attending 6th , 7th, and 8th Key Words: Science education, viewpoint to science, scientific thinking, elementary school in four different schools in the 2003-2004 school year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also stated that the level of the students attending to the schools in the city center is higher than the ones in the out skirt
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003-2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fen bilgisi eğitimi · fen bilgisine bakış açısı · bilimsel düşünme

Abstract

The opinions of the students for the science are related to meet their needs and expectations. If the content The study that seeks the answer to the question what the elementary school students think about science course, is aimed to find out the level of the their expectations. This study was applied to the 321 students attending 6th , 7th, and 8th Key Words: Science education, viewpoint to science, scientific thinking, elementary school in four different schools in the 2003-2004 school year. The questionnaire technique was used to obtain the data. Likert scale which consists of 30 questions was analyzed by comparing of the groups. The result of the research indicates that the interest of the girls to the science course is higher than the boys. It is also stated that the level of the students attending to the schools in the city center is higher than the ones in the out skirt

Özet

İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi hakkında ne düşündükleri sorusunun cevabını araştıran bu çalışma, öğrencilerin beklentilerinin karşılanma düzeyini ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, 2003-2004 eğitim-öğretim yılında dört farklı ilköğretim 6, 7 ve 8. sınıfta fen bilgisi dersini alan 321 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Örneklemden veri toplamak için anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, örneklemden verilerin toplanması için 30 sorudan oluşan likert ölçek kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sunucunda, kız öğrencilerin fen bilgisine bakış açısının erkek öğrencilere göre daha olumlu olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, şehir merkezi dışındaki okulda eğitim gören öğrencilerin fen bilgisine bakış açılarının şehir merkezindeki öğrencilere göre daha düşük düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, S., ÖNER, F. (2006). İLKÖĞRETİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FEN BİLGİSİ DERSİNE BAKIŞ AÇILARINI BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 339–346. https://ajindex.com/articles/941346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Fidan, N. & Erden, M. (1997).
  2. Eğitime Giriş, Alkım Yayınevi,
  3. İstanbul.
  4. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J. & Zeidler, D.L. (1993). A summary of research in science education-1991, ERIC/CSMEE Publication, The Ohio State University, USA. Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1996). Children’s Science, (Ed: Osborne, R., Freyberg, P.,)Learning in science: The implications of children’s science, Heinemann Education, Hong Kong. Howe, A. C. & Jones, L. (1998).
  5. Engaging Children in Science, Second Edition,
  6. PrenticeHall, New Jersey, USA. Senemoğlu, N. (2001).
  7. Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim, Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Gazi Kitabevi,Ankara.
  8. Thomas, G.P. (2003). Conceptualization, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the meta-cognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: the meta-cognitive orientations learning environment scale-science (moles-s), Learning Environments Research, 6, 175-197.
  9. Başaran, İ.E. (1996).
  10. Eğitim Psikolojisi, Eğitimin Psikolojik Temelleri, Gül Yayınevi,
  11. Ankara.
  12. McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H., Clough, M.P (1998). The nature of science education an instruction, Science & Education, 7, 511-532. 9. Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, A. (1998). Children’s ideas and the learning of science, Children’s Ideas Science, Open University Press,
  13. Buckingham, Great Britain, 1-9.
  14. Shepardson, D.P. (1997). The nature of student thinking in life science laboratories, School Science & Mathematics, 97 (1), 37-44.
  15. Kaptan, F. (1999).
  16. Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi, Öğretmen Kitapları Dizisi, MEB Yayınları,
  17. İstanbul.
  18. Nokelainen, P. & Ruohotie, P. (2000). Modern modeling of student motivation and self-regulated learning, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Assoc., New Orleans, USA. Markova, D. & Powell, A. (2002). Çocuklar Nasıl Öğrenir?, Kuraldışı Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  19. Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14 (2), 169-175.
  20. Selçuk, Z. (2001).
  21. Gelişim ve Öğrenme, Nobel Yayınları,
  22. Ankara.
  23. Griffiths, A.K. & Barry, M. (1991). Secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of science, (Ed: Forgasz, H.) Research in Science Education, Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Queensland, Australia. Enger, S.G., & Yager, R.E. (1998).
  24. The Iowa Assessment Handbook, The Iowa SS&C Project, Science Education Center of The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA Ornstein, A.C. & Lasley, T.J. (2000).
  25. Strategies for Effective Teaching, Third Editio