SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2007 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

A RESEARCH ON STUDENT’S PERCEIVED TRUST TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES

ÖĞRENCİLERİN ÜNİVERSİTELERİNE DUYDUKLARI GÜVEN ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Feride Bahar ÖZDOĞAN
İpek KALEMCİ TÜZÜN
Pages
639–650
Publication Date
2007-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of this study, perceived trust scale dimension has been established and figured out that trust values have been differentiated according to the age, income, gender and grade variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Generating stakeholder trust is the core purpose of the institution’s business strategy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study concept of trust has been discussed, then as a major stakeholder of the university, students perceived trust values towards the university has been determined and the relationships between demographic variables and perceived trust values has been viewed. 354 university students have been attended to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of this study, perceived trust scale dimension has been established and figured out that trust values have been differentiated according to the age, income, gender and grade variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:güven · algılanan güven · üniversite öğrencisi

Abstract

Generating stakeholder trust is the core purpose of the institution’s business strategy. In this study concept of trust has been discussed, then as a major stakeholder of the university, students perceived trust values towards the university has been determined and the relationships between demographic variables and perceived trust values has been viewed. 354 university students have been attended to the study. At the end of this study, perceived trust scale dimension has been established and figured out that trust values have been differentiated according to the age, income, gender and grade variables.

Özet

Paydaşların güveninin oluşturulması günümüzde her kurumun işletme stratejisi için merkez bir konumdadır. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak güven olgusu tartışılmış, daha sonraki adımlarda üniversite örneğinde paydaş yaklaşımından hareketle öğrencilerin algıladıkları güven değerleri belirlenmiş ve bu değerler ile demografik özelliklerin ilişkisine bakılmış ve bu doğrultuda değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya 354 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda algılanan güven ölçeği boyutları ortaya konmuş; yaş, gelir, cinsiyet, sınıf değişkenlerine göre algılanan güven değerlerinin farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDOĞAN, F. B., TÜZÜN, İ. K. (2007). A RESEARCH ON STUDENT’S PERCEIVED TRUST TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 639–650. https://ajindex.com/articles/941255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ALANUZZI, A. (2000). “Stakeholder Trust: How Do I Get It?”, Environmental Quality Management, 10(1), 69-73.ss. BARLAS, Y. (1996). “Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics”, System Dynamics Review, 12, 3:183-210.
  2. BRISTOW, D. N. ve K. C. SCHNEIDER (2003). “The Collegiate Student Orientation Scale (CSOS): Application of the Marketing Concept to Higher Education”, Journal of Marketing for Hıgher Educatıon,12, 2: 15-34
  3. BROMILEY, P. ve L.L. CUMMINGS (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI). Roderick M. Kramer ve Tom R. Tyler (Der.), Trust in Organizations: 302-319. Thousand Oaks: Sage. GARBARINO, E. ve M. JOHNSON (1999). “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment In Customer Relationship”, Journal of Marketing, 63, April: 70-87.
  4. GEYKENS, I. ve J.STEENKAMP (1995). “An Investigation Into The Joint Effects Of Trust and Interdependence On Relationship Commitment”, EMAC Proceedings, 3: 351-371.ss. GHOSH, A. WHIPPLE, T. Ve G. BRYAN (2001). “Student Trust And Its Antecedents In Higher Education”, The Journal Of Higher Education, 72(3), 322-340.ss. GROSSMAN, R (1998). “Developing and Managing Effective Consumer Relationships”, Journal of Product Brand Management, 7, 1: 27-40.
  5. GUILFORD, J. (1954). Psychometrics Methods. New York: McGraw Hill. GWINNER, K. Ve diğerleri (1988). “Relational Benefits In Service Industries. The Customer’s Perspective”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, Spring: 101-114.ss. HUFF, L. ve KELLEY L. (2003). “Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist -societies: A seven nation study”, Organization Science, Vol 14(1):81-91ss. HUNT, D. ve S. VITELL (1986). “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics”, Journal of Macromarketing, 6, Spring: 5-16
  6. IVERSON, R., MCLEOD, C.ve P. ERWIN. (1996). “The Role of Employee Commitment and Trust In Service Relationship”, Marketing Intelligence, 14, 3: 36-44.ss. MISHRA, A.K. (1996). Organizational Responses to Crisis: Tthe Role of Trust, KRAMER M.R. ve TYLER R.T.(Ed), Roderick M. Kramer ve Tom R. Tyler (Der.), Trust in Organizations: 114-139. Thousand Oaks: Sage. MORAN M. ve W. HOY (1998). “Trust In Schools: A Conceptual And Emprical Analysis”, Journal of Educational Administration, 36 (4), 334-348.ss. MORGAN, R. ve S.HUNT (1994). “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58, July: 20-38.ss. NUNNALLY, J.(1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill. REMPEL, J. ve J. HOLMES (1986). “How Do I Tr