SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2011 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

DEVELOPING A MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM TEST ABOUT IMPULSE AND MOMENTUM

İTME VE MOMENTUM KONUSUNDA ÇOKTAN SEÇMELİ BİR TEST GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Hasan Şahin KIZILCIK
Mustafa TAN
Pages
185–198
Publication Date
2011-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was determined that students’ acquisition level of basic objectives which are aimed to achieve conceptual understanding about impulse and momentum is insufficient to get target basic objectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is aimed to develop a multiple-choice items measurement instrument by considering basic objectives about impulse and momentum, which are determined by the researcher.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This measurement instrument was developed with implication that was carried out with the attendance of 143 2nd grade high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was determined that students’ acquisition level of basic objectives which are aimed to achieve conceptual understanding about impulse and momentum is insufficient to get target basic objectives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fizik Eğitimi · Ölçme ve Değerlendirme · İtme ve Momentum

Abstract

This study is aimed to develop a multiple-choice items measurement instrument by considering basic objectives about impulse and momentum, which are determined by the researcher. Using this measurement instrument, students’ acquisition level of basic objectives about impulse and momentum was determined. This measurement instrument was developed with implication that was carried out with the attendance of 143 2nd grade high school students. The measurement instrument was developed as multiple choice test that’s consist of 21 test items. As a result, it was determined that students’ acquisition level of basic objectives which are aimed to achieve conceptual understanding about impulse and momentum is insufficient to get target basic objectives.

Özet

Bu çalışma, itme ve momentum konusuyla ilgili olarak temel kazanımları tespit ederek, bu kazanımlara yönelik olarak çoktan seçmeli bir ölçme aracı geliştirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Bu ölçme aracından yararlanarak, öğrencilerin itme ve momentum konusunda, temel kazanımları edinme düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. İlgili ölçme aracı, Ankara ilindeki 143 genel lise 2. sınıf öğrencisinin katılımıyla elde edilmiştir. Ölçme aracı, 21 test maddesinden oluşan bir çoktan seçmli test olarak geliştirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, öğrencilerin momentumun ve korunumunun kavramsal olarak anlamayı hedefleyen temel kazanımları edinme düzeylerinin yeterli olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILCIK, H. Ş., TAN, M. (2011). DEVELOPING A MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM TEST ABOUT IMPULSE AND MOMENTUM. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 185–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/941086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, Yargı Yayınları, 9. Baskı, Ankara - Mayıs
  2. Tan, Ş., Kayabaşı, Y., Erdoğan, A., (2002). Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara
  3. Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara
  4. Bakaç, M. (2003). Fen Bilgisi Öğretiminde Ölçme-Değerlendirme Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Kış 2003, 157
  5. Harlen, W. & et al. (1991). Assessment and the improvement of education. The Curriculum Journal, 3(3), p.215-230
  6. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing. London: The Farmer Press
  7. Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (1995). Investigating teacher assessment at key stage 1: methodological problems and emerging issues. Assessment in Education, 2 (3), p.305-320
  8. Black, P. (1998). Testing: friends or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: Falmer Press
  9. Çepni, S., Özsevgeç, T., Gökdere, M. (2003). Bilişsel Gelişim ve Formal Operasyon Dönem Özelliklerine Göre ÖSS Fizik ve Lise Fizik Sorularının İncelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Kış 2003, 157
  10. Şimşek, S. (2000). Fen Bilimlerinde Değerlendirmenin Önemi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 148, s.30-32
  11. Stiggins, R., Bridgeford, N. J. (1985). The ecology of classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 271-286
  12. Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66 (4), p.338-352
  13. Logan, P., Hazel E. (1999). Language Background and Assessment in the Physical Sciences. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, Vol 24, No 1
  14. Preece, P. F. W., Skinner, N. C., Riall, R. A. H., (1999). The gender gap and discriminating power in the National Curriculum Key Stage three science assessments in England and Wales. International Journal Of Science Education, 1999, Vol. 21, No. 9, 979– 987 15. Güneş, P., İngeç, Ş., Taşar, M. F. (2002). Momentum ve İmpuls Kavramlarını Anlama – I: Öğretmen Adaylarının Açık Uçlu Sorularla Momentum ve İmpulsu Nasıl Tanımladıklarının Belirlenmesi. G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 22, Sayı 3, s.121-138 16. Duit, R. (1993). Research on students’ conceptions – developments and trends. In The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Ithaca, NY: Misconceptions Trust
  15. Bailin, S. (20