Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 65 Sayı: 1

A comprehensive computational cost analysis for state-of-the-art visual slam methods for autonomous mapping

Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2023-06-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides the performance of these methods, energy consumption and resource usage are evaluated allowing the selection of the appropriate SLAM method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is important to solve the autonomous mapping problem with high accuracy using limited energy resources in an environment without prior knowledge and/or signal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However visual SLAM methods require high processing performance for real-time operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides the performance of these methods, energy consumption and resource usage are evaluated allowing the selection of the appropriate SLAM method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Localization · mapping · indoor navigation

Abstract

It is important to solve the autonomous mapping problem with high accuracy using limited energy resources in an environment without prior knowledge and/or signal. Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) deals with the problem of determining the position and orientation of an autonomous vehicle or robot with various on-board sensors, and simultaneously creating a map of environment with low energy consumption. However visual SLAM methods require high processing performance for real-time operations. Also, processing capability of the hardware is limited by the power constraints. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the processing load and power consumption of visual SLAM methods for autonomous vehicles or robots. For visual SLAM methods, although there are different comparison studies, there is no comprehensive computational cost analysis covering different datasets and important parameters including absolute trajectory error, RAM Usage, CPU load, GPU load, with total power consumption. In this paper, ORB-SLAM2, Direct Sparse Odometry (DSO), and DSO with Loop Closure (LDSO), which are state of the art visual SLAM methods, are compared. Besides the performance of these methods, energy consumption and resource usage are evaluated allowing the selection of the appropriate SLAM method.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANIK, Ö. F., ILGIN, H. A. (2023). A comprehensive computational cost analysis for state-of-the-art visual slam methods for autonomous mapping. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 65 Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/939461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Yousif, K., Bab-Hadiashar, A., Hoseinnezhad, R., An overview to visual odometry and visual SLAM: Applications to mobile robotics, Intell. Ind. Syst., 1 (4) (2015), 289-311, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40903-015-0032-7.
  2. Huletski, A., Kartashov, D., Krinkin, K., Evaluation of the modern visual SLAM methods, Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language and Information Extraction, Social Media and Web Search FRUCT Conference (AINL-ISMW FRUCT), (2015), 19-25, https://doi.org/10.1109/AINL-ISMW-FRUCT.2015.7382963.
  3. Guçlu, O., Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using RGB-D Sensors, (2018).
  4. Doctoral Thesis, Hacettepe University, Turkey. Durrant-Whyte, H., Bailey, T., Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Part I the essential algorithms, IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., 13 (2) (2006), 99-110, https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.1638022.
  5. Chong, T. J., Tang, X. J., Leng, C. H., et al., Sensor technologies and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), Procedia Compt. Sci., 76 (2015), 174-179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.336.
  6. Filipenko, M., Afanasyev, I., Comparison of various SLAM systems for mobile robot in an indoor environment, International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS), (2018), 400-407, https://doi.org/10.1109/IS.2018.8710464.
  7. Klein, G., Murray, D., Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces, 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, (2007), 225-234.
  8. Mur-Artal, R., Montiel, J. M. M., Tardos, J. D., ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system, IEEE Trans. Robot., 31 (5) (2015), 1147-1163, https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2015.2463671.
  9. Liang, X., Chen, H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Visual laser-SLAM in large-scale indoor environments, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, (2016), 19-24.
  10. Engel, J., Schops, T., Cremers, D., LSD-SLAM: Large-scale direct monocular SLAM, European Conference on Computer Vision, (2014), 834-849, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_54.
  11. Forster, C., Pizzoli, M., Scaramuzza. D., SVO: Fast semi-direct monocular visual odometry, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (2014), 15-22, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6906584.
  12. Kerl, C., Sturm, J., Cremers, D., Dense visual SLAM for RGB-D cameras, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (2013), 2100-2106, https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696650.
  13. Whelan, T., Salas-Moreno, R., Glocker, B., ElasticFusion: Real-time dense SLAM and light source estimation, Int. J.