Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1

EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT PHYSICAL THERAPY EXERCISE TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

KRONİK BEL AĞRISINDA FARKLI FİZYOTERAPİ EGZERSİZ TEKNİKLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ: RANDOMİZE KONTROLLÜ BİR ÇALIŞMA

Pages
141–147
Publication Date
2023-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides that, the level of patient satisfaction was importantly different between all groups in favor to Core stability in chronic low back pain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Exercise therapy is the most common conservative treatment for low back pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, the aim of our study is to evaluate different types of exercises that will help increase neuromuscular facilitation and core stability in paraspinal muscles by considering patient satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides that, the level of patient satisfaction was importantly different between all groups in favor to Core stability in chronic low back pain.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:core stabilizasyon · egzersiz · bel ağrısı

Abstract

Purpose: Exercise therapy is the most common conservative treatment for low back pain. Exercise has generally been associated pain and kinesiophobia. In this context, especially paraspinal muscles need to be focused on. For this reason, the aim of our study is to evaluate different types of exercises that will help increase neuromuscular facilitation and core stability in paraspinal muscles by considering patient satisfaction. Methods: A total of thirty-seven female patients with chronic low back pain were included in the study. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire was used to assess functionality. Core stability was evaluated with a stabilizer. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured with Visual Analog Scale. Patients' kinesiophobia levels were assessed by using Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Patients were randomized into three groups according to the interventions as: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation exercise group (n = 9), core stability exercise group (n = 14) and control (n = 14) group. The duration of applications was 3 days per week with a total of 6 weeks. Results: There were group differences for core muscle strength (p = .045), Oswestry scores (p = .001), pain intensity score (p = .003) and Tampa score (p = .001). There were significant gains for Core muscle strength and Oswestry scores for Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Core stability groups (p < .05). Conclusion. Core stabilization exercises have additional effects to improve rehabilitation outcomes for patients. Besides that, the level of patient satisfaction was importantly different between all groups in favor to Core stability in chronic low back pain.

Özet

Amaç: Bel ağrısı için en yaygın konservatif tedavi egzersizdir. Egzersiz genellikle ağrı ve kinezyofobi ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda özellikle paraspinal kaslara da odaklanılması da gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle çalışmamızın amacı, paraspinal kaslarda nöromüsküler fasilitasyon ve core stabilitesini artırmaya yardımcı olacak farklı egzersiz türlerini hasta memnuniyetini göz önünde bulundurarak değerlendirmek idi. Yöntem: Kronik bel ağrısı olan otuz yedi kadın hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Fonksiyonellik değerlendirilmesi için Oswestry Bel Ağrısı Ölçeği kullanıldı. Core stabilizasyon stabilizatör ile değerlendirildi. Ağrı şiddeti ve memnuniyet Vizüel Analog Skala ile ölçüldü. Hastaların kinezyofobi düzeyleri Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği ile değerlendirildi. Hastalar rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı; Proprioseptif Nöromuskuler Fasilitasyon egzersiz grubu (n=9), Core stabilizasyon grubu (n=14) ve kontrol grubu. Uygulama süresi haftada 3 gün toplam 6 hafta idi. Sonuçlar: Core kas kuvveti (p = 0,045), Oswestry skoru (p = 0,001), ağrı şiddet skoru (p = .003) ve Tampa skoru (p = 0,001) gruplar arasında farklılık gösterdi. Proprioseptif Nöromuskuler Fasilitasyon ve Core stabilizasyon egzersiz grubunda Core kas kuvveti ve Oswestry skorlarında anlamlı kazanımlar elde edildi (p <0,05). Sonuçlar: Kronik bel ağrısında Core stabilizasyon egzersizlerinin hastaların rehabilitasyon sonuçlarını geliştirmek için ek etkileri vardır. Bunun yanı sıra Core stabilizasyon lehine hasta memnuniyet düzeyi tüm gruplar arasında önemli ölçüde farklı idi.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTAR, A., ÇAĞLAR, A., TEKİNDAL, M. A., YEMİŞÇİ, O. Ü., AYTAR, A. (2023). EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT PHYSICAL THERAPY EXERCISE TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 141–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/938363

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R, The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract & Res Clin Rheu, 2010, 24:769–81
  2. Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R, Non-specific low back pain. Lancet, 2017, 389: 736-47
  3. Paige NM, Miake-Lye IM, Booth MS, Beroes JM, Mardian AS et al, Association of spinal manipulative therapy with clinical benefit and harm for acute low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 2017, 317(14): 1451-60
  4. Shamsi MB, Sarrafzadeh J, Jamshidi A, Comparing core stability and traditional trunk exercise on chronic low back pain patients using three functional lumbopelvic stability tests. Physiother Theory Prac, 2015, 31(2):89-98
  5. Ferreira ML, Smeets RJ, Kamper SJ, Ferreira PH, Machado LA, Can we explain heterogeneity among randomized clinical trials of exercise for chronic back pain? A meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials, Phy Ther, 2010, 90:1383-1403
  6. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara AV, Koes BW. Meta-analysis: exercise therapy for nonspecific low back pain, Ann InternMed, 2005, 142: 765-75
  7. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R et al, Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an american college of physicians clinical practice guideline, Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(7):493-505
  8. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper saddle river, NJ, USA: Pearson Education Inc; 2009
  9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1997
  10. Kofotolis N, Vrabas IS, Vamvakoudis E, Papanikolaou A, Mandroukas K, Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training induced alterations in muscle fibre type and crosssectional area, Br J Sports Med, 2005, 39(3): e11
  11. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques. 2012; Fa Davis
  12. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, Yörükan S, Ureten K et al, Validation of the Turkish version of the oswestry disability index for patients with low back, Spine, 2004, 29: 581-5
  13. Critchley D. Instructing pelvic floor contraction facilitates transvers abdominis thickness increase during low-abdominal hollowing, Physiother Res Int, 2002, 7:65–75
  14. Jung D, Kim K, Lee S, Comparison of muscle activities using a pressure biofeedback unit during abdominal muscle training performed by normal adults in the standing and supine positions, J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26:191–3
  15. Grooms DR, Grindstaff TL, Croy T, Hart JM, Saliba SA, Clini