Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Comparison of different regulations and metaheuristic algorithms in beam design

Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2023-05-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Eurocode and TS500 design costs are roughly the same; however, ACI 318’s design is the cheapest.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this first study, the rectangular reinforced concrete beam’s costs and cross-section sizes are found by using Harmony Search (HS), Differential Evolution Algorithm (DE), Jaya Algorithm, Teaching- Learning Based Algorithm (TLBO), Hybrid algorithm (Jaya-TLBO) and Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) separately by using ACI 318 building code.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of running different algorithms 5, 10, 15 and 20 times, separate values are recorded, and the average number of iterations of the algorithms for each is shown by finding the standard deviation values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Eurocode and TS500 design costs are roughly the same; however, ACI 318’s design is the cheapest.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beam Design · Metaheuristic Algorithms · Building codes

Abstract

In this first study, the rectangular reinforced concrete beam’s costs and cross-section sizes are found by using Harmony Search (HS), Differential Evolution Algorithm (DE), Jaya Algorithm, Teaching- Learning Based Algorithm (TLBO), Hybrid algorithm (Jaya-TLBO) and Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) separately by using ACI 318 building code. In addition, in order to better see how successful the algorithms are, the standard deviation of the algorithms used in the project in a certain number of iterations, price changes and in which iteration the minimum cost is compared. As a result of running different algorithms 5, 10, 15 and 20 times, separate values are recorded, and the average number of iterations of the algorithms for each is shown by finding the standard deviation values. Furthermore, Hybrid Algorithm reached the objective function in fewer iterations and their standard deviations reached 0 earlier. In the second study, the beam design is made according to the ACI 318, TS500 and Eurocode 2 regulations under certain loads by using a Hybrid Algorithm with different concrete classes. Optimization of this design is made using the Matlab program, and comparisons are made between regulations. Eurocode and TS500 design costs are roughly the same; however, ACI 318’s design is the cheapest.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOŞUT, M., BEKDAŞ, G., NİGDELİ, S. M. (2023). Comparison of different regulations and metaheuristic algorithms in beam design. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/937670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bekdaş, G., Niğdeli, S. M., Yang, X.S., A novel bat algorithm based optimum tuning of mass dampers for improving the seismic safety of structures. Engineering Structures, 159, 89-98, 2018.
  2. Wang, S., Peng J., Kang, S., Evaluation of Compressive Arch Action of Reinforced Concrete Beams and Development of Design Method. Engineering Structures, 191, 479-492, 2019.
  3. Yücel, M., Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli S. M., Minimizing the Weight of Cantilever Beam via Metaheuristic Methods by Using Different Population-Iteration Combinations. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 19, 69-77, 2020.
  4. Nesheim S., Mela K., Malo K. A., Labonneta N., Optimization framework for cost and carbon emission of timber floor elements. Engineering Structures, 252, 113485, 2022.
  5. Seyyedabbasi, A., WOASCALF: A new hybrid whale optimization algorithm based on sine cosine algorithm and levy flight to solve global optimization problems. Advances in Engineering Software, 179-103272, 2022.
  6. Çoşut, M., Bekdaş, G., Niğdeli, S.M. Cost Optimization and Comparison of Rectangular Cross-section Reinforced Concrete Beams Using TS500, Eurocode 2, and ACI 318 Code. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Harmony Search, Soft Computing and Applications, Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 140, 83-91, 2022.
  7. Cakiroglu, C., Islam, K., Bekdaş, G., Billah, M., CO2 Emission and Cost Optimization of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) Columns Using Metaheuristic Algorithms. Sustainability, 13 (14): 8092, 2021.
  8. Cakiroglu, C., Bekdaş, G., Kim, S., Geem, Z. W., Optimisation of Shear and Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Steel Plate Girders Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 10 (10): 3639, 2020.
  9. Cakiroglu, C., Islam, K., Bekdaş, G., Kim, S., Geem, Z. W., Metaheuristic Optimization of Laminated Composite Plates with Cut-Outs, Coatings, 11 (10): 1235, 2021.
  10. Chakrabarty, B. K., Model for Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam. Journal of Structural Engineering,118 (11), 1992.
  11. Bekdaş, G., Niğdeli, S. M., Optimum design of reinforced concrete beams using teaching-learning based optimization. International Conference on Optimization Techniques in Engineering, 3, 7-9, 2015.
  12. Zivari, A., Habibi, A., Khaledy, N., Development of an analytical method for optimum design of reinforced concrete beams considering both flexural and shear effects. Computers and Concrete an International Journal, 117-123, 2019.
  13. Guerra, A., Kiousis, P. D., Design optimization of reinforced concrete structures. Comput