SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3

Revisiting Good Governance: Good Enough Governance and Just Enough Governance Approaches as a Functional Framework for Developing Countries

Nurten Derici Temel(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8452-1230
Pages
75–89
Publication Date
2022-10-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, the study explores the significance of organizing the institutional reforms according to the states’ existing institutional capacities and development levels, as well as determining the priorities transparently in the development process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of the state in development has undergone substantial changes under the influence of the New Institutional Economics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The new school, which grounds the emergence of the state as an institution on rational individual behaviors, assumes that the developmental state is not intervening and restricting but coordinating and developing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, the study explores the significance of organizing the institutional reforms according to the states’ existing institutional capacities and development levels, as well as determining the priorities transparently in the development process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Economic Development · Governance · State

Abstract

The role of the state in development has undergone substantial changes under the influence of the New Institutional Economics. The new school, which grounds the emergence of the state as an institution on rational individual behaviors, assumes that the developmental state is not intervening and restricting but coordinating and developing. Influencing neo-liberal development economists, this view also holds that the complementarities are key between the state, market, and civil society, which shines out the goal of good governance more and more. However, the goal that includes comprehensive institutional reforms is far from being realistic and feasible for developing countries. These countries with limited resources need to rely on the improvement of institutional capacity while implementing economic development policies, considering diverse development stages and unique institution compositions. The present paper addresses the “good enough governance” and “just enough governance” approaches that emerge with the understanding of an effective state in economic development and are shaped around good governance but develop a critical perspective. In this respect, the study explores the significance of organizing the institutional reforms according to the states’ existing institutional capacities and development levels, as well as determining the priorities transparently in the development process.

🔖

Cite This Article

Temel, N. D. (2022). Revisiting Good Governance: Good Enough Governance and Just Enough Governance Approaches as a Functional Framework for Developing Countries. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1145075

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2005). Politics and economics in weak and strong states. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(7), 1199–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.05.001
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Dar Koridor: Devletler, Toplumlar ve Özgürlüğün Geleceği. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
  3. Ahrens, J. (1999). Toward a Post-Washington Consensus: The Importance of Governance Structures in Less Developed Countries and Economies in Transition. In N. Hermes & W. Salverda (Eds.), State, Society and Development: Lessons for Africa? (pp. 18–64). Groningen: University of Groningen.
  4. Aktan, C. C., Ay, H., & Çoban, H. (2007). Siyasal Karar Alma Sürecinde Çıkar Grupları. In Coşkun Can Aktan & D. Dileyici (Eds.), Modern Politik İktisat: Kamu Tercihi (pp. 1–22). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  5. Besley, T. J., & Persson, T. (2010). State Capacity, Conflict, and Development. Econometrica, 78(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta8073
  6. Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0003
  7. Chibba, M. (2009). Governance and Development: The Current role of theory, policy and practice. World Economics, 10(2), 79–108.
  8. Derici Temel, N. (2020). Sivil Toplum, Yönetişim ve Kalkınma. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 97(25), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.679412
  9. Dixit, A. (2009). Governance Institutions and Economic Activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5
  10. Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The New Comparative Economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.08.005
  11. Fukuyama, F. (2008). What Do We Know About the Relationship Between the Political and Economic Dimensions of Development? In Governance,Governance, Growth and Development Decision- making (pp. 25–34). Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  12. Fukuyama, F. (2015). Devlet İnşası: Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Yönetişim ve Dünya Düzeni (2. Baskı). İstanbul: Profil Yayıncılık.
  13. Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good Governance as a Concept, and Why This Matters for Development Policy (No. 2012/30).
  14. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  15. Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 553–574.
  16. Jessop, B. (1998). The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: the Case of Economic Development. International Social Science Journal, 155, 29–45.
  17. Landell- Mills, P., & Serageldin, I. (1992). Governance and the external factor. In L. H. Summers & S. Shah (Eds.), World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1991. Washington D.C.
  18. Leftwich, A. (1994). Governance, the State and the Politics of Development. Development and Change, 25(2), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00519.x
  19. Levy, B., & Fukuyama, F. (2010). Development Strategies: Integrating Governance and Growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
  20. Lin, J. Y., & Nugent, J. B. (1995). Institutions and economic development. Handbook of Development Economics, 3(PART A), 2301–2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(05)80010-5
  21. Nanda, V. P. (2006). The “Good Governance” Concept Revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205282847
  22. Neyapti, B. (2022). Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson: The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. Journal of Economic Issues, 56(1), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2026184
  23. Pomerantz, P. R. (2011). Development Theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance (pp. 160–178). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200964.n25
  24. Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.4.973
  25. Rodrik, D. (2008a). A Practical Approach to Formulating Growth Strategies. In N. Serra & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance (pp. 356–366). New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Rodrik, D. (2008b). Second-Best Institutions. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 98(2), 100–104.
  27. Rodrik, D. (2009). Tek Ekonomi Çok Reçete: Küreselleşme, Kurumlar ve Ekonomik Büyüme. Ankara: Eflatun Yayınevi.
  28. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12189
  29. Ünsaldı, L. (2014). Bir Ekonomizm Eleştirisi: Türkiye’de Kalkınma Fikri. Ankara: Heretik Yayıncılık.
  30. Weiss, L., & Hobson, J. M. (1999). Devletler ve Ekonomik Kalkınma: Karsılaştırmalı Bir Tarihsel Analiz. Ankara: Dost Yayınları.
  31. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
  32. World Bank. (1989). Sub- Saharan Africa From Crisis to Sustainable Growth: A Long Term Perspective Study.
  33. World Bank. (1992). Governance and Development.
  34. World Bank. (1994). Governance: The World Bank’s experience. World Bank.
  35. Aktan, C. C., Ay, H., & Çoban, H. (2007). Siyasal Karar Alma Sürecinde Çıkar Grupları. In Coşkun Can Aktan & D. Dileyici (Eds.), Modern Politik İktisat: Kamu Tercihi (pp. 1–22). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.