SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2022 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Predicting Teacher Organizational Silence: The Predictive Effects of Locus of Control, Self-confidence, and Perceived Organizational Support

Hatice TURAN DALLI
Ferudun SEZGİN
Pages
39–79
Publication Date
2022-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that the variable with the highest predictive effects on organizational silence and self-confidence levels is perceived organizational support.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between locus of control, self-confidence, perceived organizational support and organizational silence of teachers working in Anatolian high schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the research consists of 436 teachers selected by simple random sampling method from the public schools in central districts of Ankara in 2016-2017 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that the variable with the highest predictive effects on organizational silence and self-confidence levels is perceived organizational support.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Locus of Control · Self-confidence · Perceived Organizational Support

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between locus of control, self-confidence, perceived organizational support and organizational silence of teachers working in Anatolian high schools. The research is a study of relational survey model and it aims to determine the explanatory and predictive correlations between the specified variables. The sample of the research consists of 436 teachers selected by simple random sampling method from the public schools in central districts of Ankara in 2016-2017 academic year. In order to collect data Locus of Control, Self-confidence, Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Silence scales were used. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients and path analysis were applied to determine the relationships among variables. Results show that the variable with the highest predictive effects on organizational silence and self-confidence levels is perceived organizational support. Locus of control and organizational support variables have direct and indirect predictive effects on organizational silence.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALLI, H. T., SEZGİN, F. (2022). Predicting Teacher Organizational Silence: The Predictive Effects of Locus of Control, Self-confidence, and Perceived Organizational Support. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 39–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/931996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adu, E. O., &Olantundun, S. O. (2007). Teachers’ perception of teaching as correlates students’ academic performance in Oyo State Nigeria. Essays in Education, 20, 57–63.
  2. Akalın, Ç. (2006). Organizational support perceived by employees in the development of emotional organizational commitment and organizational self-esteem as an intermediate variable. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  3. Akçin, K., Erat, S., Alnıaçık, Ü., & Çiftçioğlu, A. B. (2017). Effect of perceived organizational support on organizational silence and task performance: A study on academicians. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 11(1), 35–44.
  4. Akın, A. (2007). Academic locus of control scale: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Çukurova University Faculty of Education, 3(34), 9–17.
  5. Akiri, A. A., &Ugborugbo, N. M. (2009). Teachers’ effectiveness and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. Stud Home CommSci, 3(2), 107–113.
  6. Alqarni, S. A. Y (2015). Determinants of organizational silence behavior among faculty at King Abdul Aziz University and its relationship to some organizational variables. Future of Arab Education, 96 (22), 297-386.
  7. Alqarni, S. A. Y. (2020). How school climate predicts teachers organizational silence. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 12(1), 12-27.
  8. Arlı, D. (2013). Views of primary school principals about organizational silence. Trakya University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(2), 69–84.
  9. Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288–297.
  10. Aytaç, S. (2001). Importance of personality in terms of organizational behavior. Journal of Business, Power Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 3(1). Bayramoğlu, D., & Çetinkanat, C. A. (2020). Examining the relationship between organizational commitment and organizational silence of teachers. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 71. 25-40.
  11. Brinsfield, C. T. (2009). Employee silence: Investigation of dimensionality, development of measures, and examination of related factors. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio. Bogosian, R., &Stefanchin, J. E. (2018). Employee silence is not always consent. Rutgers Business Review, 3(2), 121-138.
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., &Demirel, F. (2011). Scientific