SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Comparing of the Effects of Liquated Humic Substance (LHS), Polyacrylamide (PAM) and Polyvinylalcohol (PVA) on Runoff and Soil Losses

Gökçen YÖNTER
Marius H. HOUNDONOUGBO
Pages
351–358
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Runoff and soil loss were decreased by using these soulutions Therefore, liquated humic substance, PAM and PVA solusions can be use reducing the erosion easily.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of liquated humic substance, polyacrylamide and polyvinylalcohol on runoff and soil losses by using a laboratory type rain simulator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this study, the 7 cm coarse gravel was placement into the erosion pan, which sized 30x45x15 cm, sloped of 9 %.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Runoff and soil loss were decreased by using these soulutions Therefore, liquated humic substance, PAM and PVA solusions can be use reducing the erosion easily.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Runoff · soil loss · humic substance

Özet

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of liquated humic substance, polyacrylamide and polyvinylalcohol on runoff and soil losses by using a laboratory type rain simulator. Material and Methods: In this study, the 7 cm coarse gravel was placement into the erosion pan, which sized 30x45x15 cm, sloped of 9 %. After laying a permeable clothe on the coarse gravel layer, soil samples which were thought to the 8 mm sieve, were placement into the erosion pan. Liquated humic substance, PAM and PVA solutions (0, 1, 2 and 4 ml l-1; 100 ml) were sprayed uniformly on soil surface by a hand type pump with 2 replicated. 40 mm h-1 of artificial rainfall was applied during 1 hour by a laboratory type rainfall simulator. The runoff start time is measured with a stopwatch. Runoff and soil losses were calculated and tabulated. Results: In this study, liquated humic substance, PAM and PVA treatments decreased runoff and soil loss significant levels. Conclusions: Runoff and soil loss were decreased by using these soulutions Therefore, liquated humic substance, PAM and PVA solusions can be use reducing the erosion easily.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÖNTER, G., HOUNDONOUGBO, M. H. (2020). Comparing of the Effects of Liquated Humic Substance (LHS), Polyacrylamide (PAM) and Polyvinylalcohol (PVA) on Runoff and Soil Losses. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 351–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/93011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akalan, İ. 1967. Toprak Fiziksel Özellikleri ve Erozyon. A.Ü.Z.F. Yıllığı. (3-4): 490-503.
  2. Akalan, İ. 1974. Toprak ve Su Muhafazası. A.Ü.Z.F. Yayın No: 532, Ankara. Anonymous, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. United States of Department of Agricultural Handbook No: 18. United States Goverment Print Office, Washington. Anonymous, 1999. SPSS 9 for Windows User’s Guide. Copyright 1999 by SPSS Inc., SPSS, Chicago, IL. Bubenzer, G.D. and L.D. Meyer. 1965. Simulation of rainfall and soils for laboratory research. Trans. ASAE., 8: 73-75.
  3. Chepil, W.S. 1954. The effect of synthetic conditioners on some phases of soil structure and erodobility by wind. Soil Science of Society of American Proceding. 18: 386-390.
  4. Cochrane, B.H.W., J.M. Reichert, F.L.F. Eltz, and L.D. Norton. 2005. Controlling soil erosion and runoff with polyacrylamide and phosphogypsum on subtropical soil. Trans. ASAE. 48(1): 149-154. DMİ., 2010. Turkish State Meteorological Service. http:// www.meteoroloji.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilçeleristatistik.aspx. Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2014. DMİ., 2013. Turkish State Meteorological Service. http:// www.meteoroloji.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilçeleristatistik.aspx. Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2014.
  5. Flanagan, D.C., L.D. Norton, J.R. Peterson, and K. Chaudhari. 2003. Using polyacrylamide to control erosion on agricultural and disturbed soils in rainfed areas. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (Ankery). 58(5): 301-311.
  6. Gee, G.W. and J.V. Bauder. 1986.
  7. Particle Size Analysis, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. No: 9, 383-411,
  8. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Hunt, N. and R. Gilkes. 1992. Farm Monitoring Handbook. The University of Western Australia: Netherlands, WA. Kempler, W.D. and R.C. Rosenau. 1986. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution. In A. Klute et al., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 425-442, 2nd Edition. Agronomy Monograf. Soil Science of America, Madison, USA. Levy, G.J. and I. Rapp. 1999. Polymer effect on surface mechanical strenght of a crusting loessial soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 37(1): 91-101.
  9. Margherita, E., G. Brunetti, C. Garcia-Izquierdo, F. Cavalcante, S. Fiore, and N. Senesi. 2006. Humic substances and clay minerals in organically-amended semi arid soils. Soil Science, 171 (4): 322-333.
  10. Middleton, H.E. 1930. Properties of Soil Which Influence Soil Erosion. USDA Tech. Bul. No: 178. Neal, J.H. 1938. The Effect of The Degree of Slope and Rainfall Cha