Journals / International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PRECISION METROLOGY SYSTEMS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Pages
114–123
Publication Date
2023-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings of the study revealed the need of standardized measurement for inspection and control of AM parts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents a comparative study on precision metrology systems such as Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM), 3-Dimensional Scanning (3DS) and Computed Tomography (CT) for polymer additive manufacturing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was also demonstrated that one of the major contributors to the expanded uncertainty occurred because of rougher surface of FDM manufactured part.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings of the study revealed the need of standardized measurement for inspection and control of AM parts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:3-Dimensional Scanning (3DS) · Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) · Computed Tomography (CT)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study on precision metrology systems such as Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM), 3-Dimensional Scanning (3DS) and Computed Tomography (CT) for polymer additive manufacturing. A special test sample was designed and manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) AM systems. The manufactured parts were then measured by three different precision metrology systems and the results were compared in terms of different measurement and AM methods. Uncertainty analyses were conducted based on the results of CMM measurements. The benchmark highlighted the difference between part characteristics manufactured by FDM and SLS, where FDM part represented higher surface roughness and more deviation to the nominal design. Furthermore, expanded uncertainties computed for the FDM manufactured part were almost three times of the uncertainties computed for the SLS manufactured part. It was also demonstrated that one of the major contributors to the expanded uncertainty occurred because of rougher surface of FDM manufactured part. Similar tendency of part to nominal deviations were observable in all metrology systems including CMM, CT and 3DS. Findings of the study revealed the need of standardized measurement for inspection and control of AM parts.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞBAŞ, B., POYRAZ, Ö., DURAKBASA, N. (2023). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PRECISION METROLOGY SYSTEMS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 114–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/929650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Razavi, S. M. J., Bordonaro, G. G., Ferro, P., Torgersen, J., Berto, F., “Porosity effect on tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V specimens produced by laser engineered net shaping technology”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 235, Issue 10, Pages 1930-1937, 2018
  2. ISO/ASTM52900-15., “Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing – General Principles – Terminology”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015
  3. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., Stucker, B., Khorasani, M., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., Khorasani, M., “Additive manufacturing technologies”, Springer, Vol
  4. Cham, Switzerland, 2021
  5. Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., Hui, D., “3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective”, Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 110, Pages 442-458, 2017
  6. Singh, R., Garg, H. K., “Fused deposition modeling–a state of art review and future applications”, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, Pages 1-20, 2016
  7. Sagbas, B., Boyacı, T. H., Durakbasa, N. M., “Precision metrology for additive manufacturing”, In The International Symposium for Production Research, Springer, Cham, Pages 324-332, 2019
  8. Poyraz, Ö., Solakoğlu, E. U., Ören, S., Tüzemen, C., Akbulut, G., “Surface texture and form characterization for powder bed additive manufacturing”, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Vol. 34, Issue 3, Pages 1653-1664, 2019
  9. Leach, R. K., Bourell, D., Carmignato, S., Donmez, A., Senin, N., Dewulf, W., “Geometrical metrology for metal additive manufacturing”, CIRP annals, Vol. 68, Issue 2, Pages 677-700, 2019
  10. Minetola, P., Iuliano, L., Marchiandi, G., “Benchmarking of FDM machines through part quality using IT grades”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 41, Pages 1027-1032, 2019
  11. Gillaugh, D., Copenhaver, W. W., Janczewski, T., Holycross, C., Sanders, D., Nessler, C., “Aeromechanical Evaluation of an FDM Printed Thermoplastic StreamVane (TM)”, In 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Pages 4600, 2017
  12. Wang, Z., Liu, R., Sparks, T., Liu, H., Liou, F., “Stereo vision-based hybrid manufacturing process for precision metal parts”, Precision Engineering, Vol. 42, Pages 1-5, 2015
  13. Stavroulakis, P. I., Leach, R. K., “Invited review article: review of post-process optical form metrology for industrial-grade metal additive manufactured parts”, Review of Scientific instruments, Vol. 87, Issue 4, 04