Journals / İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 4

COMPLICATIONS OF MIDURETHRAL SLING OPERATIONS

MİDÜRETRAL SLİNG CERRAHİSİ KOMPLİKASYONLARI

Pages
229–235
Publication Date
2019-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the complications encountered, preventive measures and management will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Midurethral sling operations are the most commonly performed surgeries in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Midurethral sling surgeries are minimally invasive with high success rate and rare complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the complications encountered, preventive measures and management will be discussed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Midüretral sling cerrahisi · üriner inkontinan · stres üriner inkontinans

Abstract

Midurethral sling operations are the most commonly performed surgeries in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Midurethral sling surgeries are minimally invasive with high success rate and rare complications. However; the type of complications encountered are different than other incontinence surgeries. The complications may be classified as intraoperative, early, and late complications. In this review, the complications encountered, preventive measures and management will be discussed.

Özet

Midüretral sling cerrahileri, günümüzde stres üriner inkontinansın cerrahi tedavisinde en sık uygulanan yöntemlerdir. Midüretral sling cerrahileri minimal invaziftir; başarı oranları yüksek ve komplikasyonları nadirdir. Ancak; komplikasyonları diğer stress üriner inkontinans cerrahilerinden farklıdır. Komplikasyonlar; peroperatif, erken dönem ve geç dönem komplikasyonlar olarak üçe ayrılabilir. Bu derlemede komplikasyonlar ve önleme yolları ve çözüm önerilerine değinilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞURLUCAN, F. G., ERTÜRK, E., YAŞA, C. (2019). COMPLICATIONS OF MIDURETHRAL SLING OPERATIONS. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 82 - Sayı: 4, 229–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/92934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2009;29:4-20
  2. Kelleher C. Epidemiology and classification of urinary incontinence. In: Urogynecology Cordozo L (ed.) Churchill Livingstone, Newyork. 1997;3-26
  3. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003;61:37-49
  4. Petros PE and Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence: experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;166:3-8
  5. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anaesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:81-6
  6. Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini- invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 2001;6:1306-13
  7. Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(7):CD006375
  8. Abdel-Fattah M, Ford JA, Lim CP, Madhuvrata P. Singleincision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol 2011;60:468-80
  9. Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, Patel M, White AB, Orejuela FJ, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:71.e1-27
  10. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J, Maher C, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, Webb RJ. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:3-15
  11. CommitteeOpinionNo:694: Management of Mesh and Graft Complications in Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129(4):e102-8
  12. Chapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, Milani AL, Arlandis S, Artibani W, Bauer RM, Burkhard F, Cardozo L, Castro-Diaz D,