Journals / İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

An ethnobotanical study in Pöhrenk village (Çiçekdağı-Kırşehir province / Turkey)

Pages
131–141
Publication Date
2020-08-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The data obtained in this study provided clues to ethnobotanists (or botanists), pharmacologists, and perhaps future local development projects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: This article presents important ethnobotanical information obtained in Pöhrenk village (Çiçekdağı- Kırşehir) which has the experience of severe migration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The ethnobotanical study was carried out in Pöhrenk village between July 2018 and June 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The data obtained in this study provided clues to ethnobotanists (or botanists), pharmacologists, and perhaps future local development projects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çiçekdağı · Ethnobotany · Kırşehir

Abstract

Background and Aims: This article presents important ethnobotanical information obtained in Pöhrenk village (Çiçekdağı- Kırşehir) which has the experience of severe migration. The aim of this study is to gather traditional ethnobotanical knowledge of wild plants used in this village which is located in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey, and to identify the uses and local names of these wild plants. Methods: The ethnobotanical study was carried out in Pöhrenk village between July 2018 and June 2019. The information, including the traditional uses of wild plants, was obtained from local people through face to face interviews, and during this study, 36 people (25 female and 11 male) were interviewed. During this period, demographic characteristics of participants, names of the local plants, their utilized parts and preparation methods were investigated and recorded. Results: A total of 51 wild taxa belonging to 23 families were collected. According to the obtained data, the plants are mostly used as food (32 taxa), traditional folk medicine (9 taxa), making goods (6 taxa) and fodder (4 taxa). Also, the most represented families are Rosaceae (21.56%), Asteraceae (15.68%), Lamiaceae (5.88%) and Fabaceae (5.88%). Furthermore, the study was compared with three ethnobotanical studies conducted in nearby regions. Conclusion: The data obtained in this study provided clues to ethnobotanists (or botanists), pharmacologists, and perhaps future local development projects.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, B., YEŞİL, Y. (2020). An ethnobotanical study in Pöhrenk village (Çiçekdağı-Kırşehir province / Turkey). İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 131–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/92724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akkemik, Ü. (2018). Türkiye’nin doğal-egzotik ağaç ve çalıları (Gymnospermler- Angiospermler) [Turkey’s natural-exotic trees and shrubs (Gymnospermae-Angiospermae)]. Ankara, Turkey: Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
  2. Ayandın, H. (2010). Ethnobotanical characteristics in the region between Avşar, Şabanözü and Çile Mount (Polatlı/Ankara) (Master of Science dissertation, Selçuk University, Institute of science, Konya). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Bulut, G., & Tuzlacı, E. (2015). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Bayramiç (Çanakkale-Turkey). Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal, 19, 268−282. Merkel, A. (2019, May 15). Climate-data. Retrieved from https:// en.climate-data.org. Davis, P. H. (Ed.) (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Vol. 1−9). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Davis, P. H., Mill, R. R., & Tan, K. (Eds.) (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Vol. 10, Supplement I). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  4. Doğan, Y., Nedelcheva, A., & Pieroni, A. (2017). The diversity of plants used for the traditional dish sarma in Turkey: Nature, garden and traditional cuisine in the modern era. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 29, 429−440. Erik, S., & Tarıkahya, B. (2004). Türkiye florası üzerine [About flora of Turkey]. Kebikeç, 17, 139−163. Ertuğ, F. (2014). Etnobotanik [Ethnobotany]. In A.Güner & T. Ekim (Eds.), Resimli Türkiye florası [Illustrated Flora of Turkey] (Vol. 1, pp. 319−380). Istanbul, Turkey: Ali Nihat Gökyiğit Vakfı, Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  5. Given, D. R., & Harris, W. (1994). Techniques and methods of ethnobotany. Lincoln: Commonwealth Secretariat. Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., & Başer, K. H. C. (Eds.). (2000). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Vol. 11 Supplement II). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  6. Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M., & Babaç, M. T. (Eds.). (2012). Türkiye bitkileri listesi (Damarlı bitkiler) [Turkey plant list (Vascular plants)]. Istanbul, Turkey: Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Yayınları.
  7. Güner, A. (Ed.). (2014). Resimli Türkiye Florası cilt 1 [Illustrated Flora of Turkey vol. 1]. Istanbul: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi, Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  8. Güner, A., Kandemir, A., Menemen, Y., Yıldırım, H., Aslan, S., Ekşi, G., Güner, I. & Çimen, A. Ö. (Eds.) (2018). Resimli Türkiye flor