Journals / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Changes in Stomatal Properties of Safflower Cultivars Under Salinity

Pages
246–253
Publication Date
2023-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that significant differences for all stomatal features of the safflower cultivars were determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The stomatal characteristics in the leaves play a key role to adapt to several abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and salinity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted at the Seed Science and Technology Laboratory, Eskişehir Osmangazi University in 2022 in order to examine the abaxial and adaxial stomatal properties of 9 safflower cultivars (Dinçer 5-18-1, Remzibey-05, Balcı, Yekta, Linas, Olas, Olein, Safir, and Zirkon) under salt stress (100 mM NaCl).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that significant differences for all stomatal features of the safflower cultivars were determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Carthamus tinctorius L. · Stomata density · Genotype

Abstract

The stomatal characteristics in the leaves play a key role to adapt to several abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and salinity. This study was conducted at the Seed Science and Technology Laboratory, Eskişehir Osmangazi University in 2022 in order to examine the abaxial and adaxial stomatal properties of 9 safflower cultivars (Dinçer 5-18-1, Remzibey-05, Balcı, Yekta, Linas, Olas, Olein, Safir, and Zirkon) under salt stress (100 mM NaCl). The density, width, length, size, and index of the stomata were measured. The data was analyzed by a two-factor factorial in completely randomized design. The results showed that significant differences for all stomatal features of the safflower cultivars were determined. The stomata density changed with safflower cultivars between 143 and 57 number mm-2 and stomata size was observed as 510-698 µm2. The number of abaxial stomata was higher than the adaxial part of leaves and the stomatal density on the abaxial part of six safflower cultivars (Remzibey-05, Balcı, Yekta, Olas, Olein, and Safir) was decreased by salinity. In addition, abnormal stomata were observed in salt-affected cultivars of Dinçer 5-18-1, Remzibey-05, Yekta, Olein, and Zirkon. The stomata density mainly depended on genetic factors, suggesting that it should be used for separating safflower cultivars, but they declined considerably by salinity. It was concluded that stomatal properties should be considered to clarify the salt tolerance of safflower genotypes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGİN, N., KAYA, M. D. (2023). Changes in Stomatal Properties of Safflower Cultivars Under Salinity. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 246–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/925684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Babosha A, Kumachova T, Ryabchenko A, Komarova G. 2022. Microrelief of the leaf epidermis and stomatal polymorphism of Malus orientalis, Pyrus caucasica and Mespilus germanica in mountains and plains. Flora, 291: 152074.
  2. Bray S, Reid DM. 2002. The effect of salinity and CO2 enrichment on the growth and anatomy of the second trifoliate leaf of Phaseolus vulgaris. Can J Bot, 80(4): 349-359.
  3. Bresler E, Mcneal BL, Carter DL. 2012. Saline and Sodic Soils: Principles - Dynamics - Modeling. Springer Science, Business Media, Berlin, Germany,pp: 236. Choi B, Ahn YE, Jang TS. 2022. Implications of foliar epidermal micromorphology using light and scanning electron microscopy: A useful tool in taxonomy of Korean irises. Microsc Res Tech, 85(7): 2549-2557.
  4. Cavusoglu K, Kiliç S, Kabar K. 2007. Effects of pretreatments of some growth regulators on the stomata movements of barley seedlings grown under saline (NaCl) conditions. Plant Soil Environ, 53(12): 551-557.
  5. Çimen B, Yeşiloğlu T, İncesu M, Yilmaz B, Kaçar YA. 2016. Production of tetraploid plants of some citrus genotypes. Derim, 33(2): 175-188.
  6. Dikobe TB, Mashile B, Sinthumule RR, Ruzvidzo O. 2021. Distinct morpho-physiological responses of maize to salinity stress. Am J Plant Sci, 12(6): 946-959.
  7. El-Kady MS, Abu-Ellail FF, El-Laboudy EHS. 2021. Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under water salinity stress in new reclaimed land. J Plant Prod, 12(1): 63-72.
  8. Ergin N, Kulan EG, Gözükara MA, Kaya MF, Çetin ŞÖ, Kaya MD. 2021a. Response of germination and seedling development of cotton to salinity under optimal and suboptimal temperatures. KSU J Agric Nat, 24(1): 108-115.
  9. Ergin N, Kaya MF, Kaya MD. 2021b. Stomatal characteristics of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. ISPEC 8th International Conference on Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Rural Development, 24-25
  10. December, Bingöl, Türkiye, pp: 695-704.
  11. Gan Y, Zhou L, Shen ZJ, Shen ZX, Zhang YQ, Wang GX. 2010. Stomatal clustering, a new marker for environmental perception and adaptation in terrestrial plants. Bot Stud, 51(3): 325-336.
  12. Hamani AKM, Li S, Chen J, Amin AS, Wang G, Xiaojun S, Zain M, Gao Y. 2021. Linking exogenous foliar application of glycine betaine and stomatal characteristics with salinity stress tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. BMC Plant Biol, 21(1): 1-12.
  13. Hasanuzzaman M, Raihan MRH, Masud AAC, Rahman K, Nowroz F, Rahman M, Nahar K, Fujita M. 2021. Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in pl