Journals / BİLTÜRK Ekonomi ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Human Resources Practices in Metropolitan Municipalities in Context of Performance Indicators

Pages
139–153
Publication Date
2023-04-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The limited level of performance indicators related to human resources constitutes the impression that metropolitan municipalities cannot fully transition from the understanding of personnel management to human resources management in terms of content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate the level of reflection of the human resources management approach to public institutions, in particular metropolitan municipalities, through performance indicators is the aim of the research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data were obtained from the 2021 activity reports of 30 metropolitan municipalities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The limited level of performance indicators related to human resources constitutes the impression that metropolitan municipalities cannot fully transition from the understanding of personnel management to human resources management in terms of content.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Human Resources · Metropolitan Municipalities · Performance Indicator

Abstract

To evaluate the level of reflection of the human resources management approach to public institutions, in particular metropolitan municipalities, through performance indicators is the aim of the research. The research data were obtained from the 2021 activity reports of 30 metropolitan municipalities. The concept of human resources, which has been adopted in for-profit private sector businesses, has also been used by public institutions in recent years. The efficiency of human resources comes to the priority in improving the quality of public services offered to local people. It is understood that 190 of the 5998 performance indicators included in the 2021 activity reports of the metropolitan municipalities within the scope of the research are related to the human resources functions. The most used human resources function was training and development at a rate of 47% (90) among the performance indicators. Afterwards, it is understood that subjects such as motivation of employees and mentoring (20%; 38 items) are included. It has been determined that there is only 1 performance indicator for selection and placement and career management. The limited level of performance indicators related to human resources constitutes the impression that metropolitan municipalities cannot fully transition from the understanding of personnel management to human resources management in terms of content.

Özet

To evaluate the level of reflection of the human resources management approach to public institutions, in particular metropolitan municipalities, through performance indicators is the aim of the research. The research data were obtained from the 2021 activity reports of 30 metropolitan municipalities. The concept of human resources, which has been adopted in for-profit private sector businesses, has also been used by public institutions in recent years. The efficiency of human resources comes to the priority in improving the quality of public services offered to local people. It is understood that 190 of the 5998 performance indicators included in the 2021 activity reports of the metropolitan municipalities within the scope of the research are related to the human resources functions. The most used human resources function was training and development at a rate of 47% (90) among the performance indicators. Afterwards, it is understood that subjects such as motivation of employees and mentoring (20%; 38 items) are included. It has been determined that there is only 1 performance indicator for selection and placement and career management. The limited level of performance indicators related to human resources constitutes the impression that metropolitan municipalities cannot fully transition from the understanding of personnel management to human resources management in terms of content.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİYEK, R., BİLGE, E. (2023). Human Resources Practices in Metropolitan Municipalities in Context of Performance Indicators. BİLTÜRK Ekonomi ve İlişkili Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 139–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/925369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Akçakaya, M. (2017), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Performans Yönetimi ve Karşılaşılan Sorunlar”, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 52 (1), s. 56-83.
  2. Armstrong, M. (2011). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page Publishers,
  3. London and Philadelphia. Boztepe, M. (2018), “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışı ve Geleneksel Kamu Personel Rejimi Üzerine Etkileri”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 3, s. 191-210.
  4. Bölükbaşı, A. ve Çakmur Yıldırtan, Z. (2010), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Belediyenin Başarısını ve Yaşam Memnuniyetini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması”, Öneri, Cilt: 9, Sayı: 33, s. 227-235.
  5. Çetin, C, Dinç Elmalı, E. ve Arslan, M. (2018).
  6. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta Yayınları,
  7. İstanbul.
  8. Çetinel, F. Gül (2003), “Personel Yönetiminden İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimine: Tarihsel Bir Perspektif”, Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (1), s. 175-200.
  9. Çevikbaş, R. (2012), “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışı ve Türkiye Uygulamaları”, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 2, s. 9-32.
  10. Delery, J.E. ve D. Roumpi (2017), “Strategic Human Resource Management, Human Capital and Competitive Advantage: Is The Field Going in Circles”, Human Resource Management Journal, 27, s. 1-21.
  11. Dessler, G. (2004). A framework for human resource management. Pearson Education India. Eroğlu, H. Tuğba (2010), “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışının Türk Kamu Personeli Yönetimine Etkisi”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6, Sayı: 12, s. 225-233.
  12. Eryılmaz, B. (2008),
  13. Kamu Yönetimi, Ankara:
  14. Okutman Yayıncılık. Gruening, G. (2001). “Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management”, International Public Management Journal 4, s. 1-25.
  15. Karaarslan, H. (2015), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Performans Ölçümü ve Göstergeler”, Strategic Public Management Jorunal, Sayı: 2, s. 88-107.
  16. Karasu, Y. A. Ve Demir, D. (2012).
  17. Stratejik Planlama, Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Ve Büyükşehir Belediyelerindeki Uygulamalar. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 339-349.
  18. Köse, H. (2015), “Belediyelerde Faaliyet Raporu Hazırlama Süreci ve Ortaya Çıkan Sorunlar”, Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 37, s. 51-66.
  19. Köseoğlu, D. Ve Uğur, A. (2018), “Belediyelerde İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimine Geçiş ve Karşılaşılan Sorunlar Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 1, s. 147-178.
  20. Köseoğlu, Ö. Ve Şen, M. (2014), “Kamu Sektöründe Performans Yönetimi: Politikalar, Uygulamalar ve So