In addition, it is determined that recommended stock performances are only 1.2% higher than the BIST-100 index performance in the long term.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The paper examines the effects of business magazines recommendations on the stock returns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, it is analyzed whether investors can gain abnormal returns from the “buy” recommendations given by the weekly magazine “Para” cover the period February 2006-December 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is determined that recommended stock performances are only 1.2% higher than the BIST-100 index performance in the long term.
Öz The paper examines the effects of business magazines recommendations on the stock returns. For this purpose, it is analyzed whether investors can gain abnormal returns from the “buy” recommendations given by the weekly magazine “Para” cover the period February 2006-December 2012. The findings show that recommendations cannot help investors to earn abnormal returns from stocks. The reason of this might be the low circulation of business magazines in Turkey. In addition, it is determined that recommended stock performances are only 1.2% higher than the BIST-100 index performance in the long term.
EYÜBOĞLU, D. K., BULUT, A. P. D. H. İ. (2017). The Effects of Business Magazine Recommendations on the Stock Prices in Turkey: Case of Para. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 109–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/9224
Albert, Jr. R. and Smaby, T. (1996). Market Response to Analyst Recommendations in the ‘Dartboard’ Column: The Information and Price-Pressure Effects, Review of Financial Economics, 5, 59–74.
Allen, David S., Awang-Damit, H. (1998). The Wall Street Journal Investment Dartboard, Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University, College of Business Administration, Working Paper. Barber, B. M., Loeffler, D. (1993). The Dartboard Column: Second-Hand Information and Price Pressure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28, 273-284.
Beneish, M.D. (1991). Stock Prices and the Dissemination of Analysts’ Recommendations, Journal of Business, 64, 393–416.
Brooks, R. M., Ajay P., Tie S. (2003). How the Equity Market Responds to Unanticipated Events, Journal of Business, 76, 109-133.
Brown, S.J., Warner J.B., (1985). Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies, Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3-31. Business Magazine of PARA. 26 February 2006-26 December 2010.
Cervellati E. M., Ferretti R., Pattitoni, P. (2014). Market Reaction to Second-Hand News: Inside the Attention-Grabbing Hypothesis, Applied Economics, 46(10), 1108-1121
Davies, P. L., Canes, M. (1978). Stock Prices and the Publication of Second-Hand Information, Journal of Business, 51, 43-56. Dergi Pazarlama ve Planlama (DPP). http://www.dpp. com.tr/. Desai, H., Jain P. C. (1995). An Analysis of the Recommendations of the ‘Superstar’ Money Managers at Barron’s Annual Roundtable, The Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1257-1273.
Fama E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A View Theory and Empirical Work, The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-416.
Ferreira, E. J., Smith, S.D. (1999). Stock Price Reactions to Recommendations in the Wall Street Journal ‘Small Stock Focus’ Column, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 379-389.
Graham, J. R. Koski, J. F., Loewenstein, U. (2006). Information Own and Liquidity around Anticipated and Unanticipated Dividend Announcements, Journal of Business, 79, 2301-2336.