Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2

A THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF THE USA CONFLICT OF LAWS: VARIOUS THEORY AND METHODS, II. RESTATEMENT AND THE LAW TO BE APPLIED TO CONTRACTS

ABD Kanunlar İhtilâfı Hukukuna Kuramsal ve Metodolojik Bir Bakış: Çeşitli Teori ve Metotlar, II. Restatement ve Sözleşmeye Uygulanacak Hukuk

Pages
129–170
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Restatement regarding the governing law of obligation relationships arisen from contracts can be suggested to be revolutionary with regards to the recent confl ict of laws theory and methodology

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has focused on some theoretic and methodological advancements having infl uences on the USA confl ict of laws and applicable law to contract in II.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the vested rights theory refl ecting the characteristic features of I.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Restatement regarding the governing law of obligation relationships arisen from contracts can be suggested to be revolutionary with regards to the recent confl ict of laws theory and methodology
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanunlar ihtilâfı · Kanunlar ihtilâfı kuram ve metodolojisi · Kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukuna ilişkin II. Restatement

Abstract

This study has focused on some theoretic and methodological advancements having infl uences on the USA confl ict of laws and applicable law to contract in II. Restatement. After the vested rights theory refl ecting the characteristic features of I. Restatement (which is also called as classical system) is examined, the criticism directed to the USA classical confl ict of laws and contemporary trends in the fi eld and II. Restatement will be discussed. The regulations in the II. Restatement regarding the governing law of obligation relationships arisen from contracts can be suggested to be revolutionary with regards to the recent confl ict of laws theory and methodology

Özet

Bu çalışma, ABD kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukunu etkileyen bazı kuramsal ve metodolojik gelişmeler ile II. Restatement’ta sözleşmeye uygulanacak hukuk üzerine odaklanmıştır. I. Restatement’a karakteristik özelliğini yansıtan (klâsik sistem olarak da ifade edilen) kazanılmış haklar kuramı incelendikten sonra, klâsik ABD kanunlar ihtilâfı hukukuna yöneltilen eleştiriler ve bu alandaki çağdaş eğilimler ile II. Restatement üzerinde durulacaktır. Sözleşmeden doğan borç ilişkilerine uygulanacak hukuka ilişkin II. Restatement’ta yer alan düzenlemelerin, son dönem kanunlar ihtilâfı hukuku kuram ve metodolojisi açısından devrim niteliğinde olduğu söylenebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, M. (2016). A THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF THE USA CONFLICT OF LAWS: VARIOUS THEORY AND METHODS, II. RESTATEMENT AND THE LAW TO BE APPLIED TO CONTRACTS. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 129–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/922273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. ALTUĞ, Yılmaz, “Anglo-Amerikan Âleminin İlk Önemli Devletler Hususî Hukukçusu Joseph Story”, İÜHFM., 1959,
  2. C. XXIV, S. 1-4, s. 63-75 (Story). ALTUĞ, Yılmaz (1973), Devletler Hususî Hukuku, İstanbul (DHH). AUDIT, Bernard, “A Continental Lawyer Looks at Contemporary American Choice-of-Law Principles”, 27 The American Journal of Comparative Law (1979), S. 4, s. 589-603.
  3. AYGÜN, Mesut, “ABD Kanunlar İhtilâfı Hukukunda Akde Uygulanacak Hukuka İlişkin Currie’nin Devlet Menfaatinin Tahlili Teorisi ve En Sıkı İrtibatlı Hukuk”, Mahmut Tevfik Birsel’e Armağan, İzmir 2001, s. 443-460.
  4. BATIFFOL, Henri (1955), Traité Élémentaire de Droit International Privé, Deuxieme Edition,
  5. Paris. BERKİ, Osman Fazıl (1966), Devletler Hususî Hukuku, C. II: Kanun İhtilâfl arı, 6. Baskı,
  6. Ankara.
  7. BLOM, Joost, “Choice of Law Methods in the Private International Law of Contract (Part II)”, The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 1979, s. 206-246.
  8. BRILMAYER, Lea (1995),
  9. Confl ict of Laws, Second Edition, USA: Little, Brown and Company (Confl ict). BRILMAYER, Lea/ GOLDSMITH, Jack (2002), Confl ict of Laws: Cases and Materials, Fifth Edition, New York: Aspen Law & Business (Cases and Materials) CAVERS, David F., “Contemporary Confl icts Law in American Perspective”, 131 Rec. des Cours, (1970/III), s. 75-307.
  10. CHEATHAM, E. E., “American Theories of Confl ict of Laws: Their Role and Utility”, Harvard Law Review, 1944-45, s. 361-394.
  11. CHEATHAM, E. E./ GOODRICH, H. F./GRISWOLD, E. N./ REESE, W.L.M. (1957), Confl ict of Laws Cases and Materials and 1961
  12. Supplement, Fourth Edition, Brooklyn: The Foundation Inc. CHESHIRE, G. C. (1961)
  13. Private International Law, Sixth Edition,
  14. London. CLARKSON, Christopher M. V./ HILL, Jonathan (2011),
  15. The Confl ict of Laws, Fourth Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. COLLIER, J. G. (2001),
  17. Confl ict of Laws, Third Edition, London: Cambridge University Press.
  18. COLLINS, Lawrance, “Comity in Modern Private International Law”, Essays in Honour of Sir Peter North: Reform and Development o Private International Law, (Edited by James Fawcett), New York: Oxford University Press 2002, s. 89-110 (“Comity”). COLLINS, Lawrance (2006),
  19. Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Confl ict of Laws, Fourteenth Edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell (Dicey, Morris and Collins). COOK, Walter Wheeler (1949), The Logical and the Legal Bases of the Confl ict of Laws, Second Edition, California: Harvard University Press.
  20. CRAWFORD, E. B./ CARRUTHERS, J. M. (2010), Private International Law: A Scots