Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Miles-Huberman Model in Qualitative Data Analysis

Nitel Veri Analizinde Miles-Huberman Modeli

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2017-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is hoped that this study will lead the researcher who will use qualitative research methods in collecting information about qualitative data, researching, and also be selecting and applying analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the theoretical basis of Miles-Huberman model and strategies for implementation are discussed from data analysis methods used in qualitative researches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study will focus on conceptual grounds that are lacking in the analysis of qualitative research data and strategies for implementation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is hoped that this study will lead the researcher who will use qualitative research methods in collecting information about qualitative data, researching, and also be selecting and applying analysis.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nitel Araştırma · Nitel Veri · Nitel Veri Analizi

Abstract

In this study, the theoretical basis of Miles-Huberman model and strategies for implementation are discussed from data analysis methods used in qualitative researches. In essence, this study aimed to provide a conceptual basis for the problem of the application which often arises from the lack of methodology in qualitative data analysis. The study will focus on conceptual grounds that are lacking in the analysis of qualitative research data and strategies for implementation. For this purpose, qualitative patterns which are frequently emphasized in the frame are scanned and the obtained data are discussed at the theoretical dimension and besides, methods and strategies to guide qualitative analysis applications are given. As a result of the study, it was determined that the qualitative data analysis tried to investigate in depth with all the dysfunctional dynamics which are subject to qualitative research, which is quite different and subjective process from other analysis methods. This study aims to complete the deficiencies in current and easily applicable qualitative analysis methods, which are particularly lacking in the Turkish literature. It is hoped that this study will lead the researcher who will use qualitative research methods in collecting information about qualitative data, researching, and also be selecting and applying analysis.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, nitel araştırmalarda kullanılan veri analizi yöntemlerinden Miles-Huberman modelinin kuramsal temelleri ve uygulamaya yönelik stratejileri ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma özünde nitel veri analizinde araştırmacıların sıklıkla yöntembilim eksikliklerinden doğan uygulama sorunlarına karşı kavramsal bir zemin oluşturmayı hedeflemiştir. Çalışma ile nitel araştırma verilerinin analizinde eksikliği hissedilen kavramsal zemin oluşturulacak ve uygulamaya dönük stratejiler üzerinde durulacaktır. Bu amaçla belirtilen çerçevede alanyazında sıklıkla vurgulanan nitel desenler taranarak, elde edilen veriler kuramsal boyutta tartışılmış, bunun yanında nitel analiz uygulamalarına yön verecek yöntemler ve stratejiler hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, nitel veri analizinin diğer analiz yöntemlerinden oldukça farklı ve öznel bir süreci ifade ettiği, nitel araştırmaya konu olan sorunsalı tüm dinamikleriyle ve derinlemesine incelemeye çalıştığı belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma özellikle Türkçe alanyazında eksikliği hissedilen güncel ve kolaylıkla uygulanabilir nitel analiz yöntemlerindeki eksikliğin tamamlanması amacını gütmektedir. Çalışmanın, nitel araştırma yöntemlerini kullanacak araştırmacılara gerek nitel verilere ilişkin bilgi toplama, araştırma ve gerekse analiz seçimi ve uygulamalarında yol göstereceği umulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baltacı, A. (2017). Miles-Huberman Model in Qualitative Data Analysis. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/921124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anward, J. (1997). “Semiotics In Educational Research”, J.P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Elsevier içinde 106-111.
  2. Appleton, J.V. (1995). Analysing qualitative interview data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 993-997.
  3. Arastaman, G., ve Balci, A. (2013). Investigation of High School Students' Resiliency Perception in Terms of Some Variables. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 922-928.
  4. Atkinson, K.P. (1992). “The Man of Professional Wisdom”, M.M. Fonow ve J.A. Cook (ed.), Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington ve Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Un. Press, S.16-34.
  5. Balcı, A. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. (11. Baskı). Ankara:
  6. PegemA Yayıncılık. Baltaci, A., ve Balcı, A. (2017). Complexity Leadership: A Theorical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 5(1), 30-58.
  7. Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Comunucation Research. New York: Hafner. Bogdan, R.C., ve Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: A introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bouma, G.D., ve Atkinson, G.B.J. (1995). A handbook of social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Chomsky, N., (2009). Language and Problems of Knowledge. M.A.:MIT Press.
  9. Coffey, A. ve Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications Inc. Creswell, J.W., ve Miller, D.L. (2000). Determining Qualitative Research Methods. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124-130.
  10. Daymon, C., ve Holloway, I. (2003). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and marketing communications. London: Routledge. Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. IN: Indiana Un. Press.
  11. Eysenbach, G., ve Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. Bmj, 324(7337), 573-577.
  12. Feldman, M. (1995). Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. CA: Sage. Fidan, T. ve Öztürk, İ. (2015). Perspectives and expectations of union member and non- union member teachers on teacher unions. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5 (2), 191-220.
  13. Finnegan, R. (1996). “Using Documents”, R. Sapsford ve