Journals / Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research / 2023 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Urban Public Streets in the Collective Memory: A Case Study Of Uray Street In Mersin

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2023-05-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained memory data were evaluated and the changes were tried to be determined

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Streets are public spaces that constitute the transportation network of cities, not only as a means of transportation, but also in the spaces they host, which have an important place in the daily life of individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With its 'modern' spaces, which are standardized in terms of living spaces and, more accurately, monotonous, the city also destroys and weakens the bond it establishes with its inhabitants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained memory data were evaluated and the changes were tried to be determined
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Collective Memory · Oral History · Urban Public Space

Abstract

Streets are public spaces that constitute the transportation network of cities, not only as a means of transportation, but also in the spaces they host, which have an important place in the daily life of individuals. It is affected by the social, social and economic transformations and changes we live in, in public spaces, which are an important part of cities, as well as cities. This situation causes the continuity of the urban memory to weaken and even to disappear over time. Collective memory, which has a strong connection with the physical structure of cities and the formation of their identity, is the reading of the signs and symbolic meanings of the physical environment in the cognitive structure of society with social, historical and psychological components. Cities, which are rapidly changing and transforming with new technological and economic advances, are gradually moving away from their own past and losing their identities. With its 'modern' spaces, which are standardized in terms of living spaces and, more accurately, monotonous, the city also destroys and weakens the bond it establishes with its inhabitants. This situation causes the city to lose its memory. This study investigates the changing and transforming position of Uray Street, which has been an important street since the first establishment of Mersin, a port city in the south of Turkey, in the city's memory. For this purpose, in-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with individuals in different age groups using Uray Street. The memories of Uray street were questioned by interviewing the users of long-term memory places in the area, and the changes that took place in the Uray street were questioned from the eyes of the owners of these places. The obtained memory data were evaluated and the changes were tried to be determined

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, E. E. (2023). Urban Public Streets in the Collective Memory: A Case Study Of Uray Street In Mersin. Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/920175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aşur F., Akpınar Kulekçi, E. & Perihan, M., (2022).,’The role of urban landscapes in the formation of urban identity and urban memory relations: the case of Van/Turkey,’ Planning Perspectives, 37:4, 841-857, doi: 10.1080/02665433.2022.2090418 Boyer, M. Christine. (1996). ‘The city of Collective Memory:Its Historical Imagery and Architectural Entertainments.’ Cambridge: Mit, Press,
  2. Boyer, C., (1993).,’ The City of Collective Memory: Its Historical Imagery and Architectural Entertainments.’ London. MIT Press, pp.380. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiedell, S., (2003). ‘ Public Places- Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design’ (Oxford: Architectural Press) Carr, S., M. Francis, L.G. Rivlin, and A.Stone. (1992),’Public Space’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Castello, L. (2010).,’Rethinking the Meaning of Place.’ Ashgate Publishing Limited, England. Chekki, D.,(1994). (Ed.), The Community of Streets (Greenwich, CT: Jai Press) Connerton, P. (1999). ‘Toplumlar nasıl anımsar?’(Çev:A. Şenel) İstanbul,
  4. Ayrıntı Yayınları Cullen, G., (1996)., ‘The Concise Townscape’, Amsterdam: Architectural Press.
  5. Danacıoğlu, E., (2001). ‘Geçmişin İzleri, Yanı Başımızdaki Tarih için bir Klavuz’ (Traces of the past, A Guide to the History Next to us), İstanbul.
  6. Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publishing. Doğu, T., Deligöz Varkal, M., (2017), ‘Hafıza Kutusu: bir kentsel kollektif bellek deneyimi’, Megaron, 12(4);545-552. doi: 10.5505/megaron.2017.09226 Gehl, J., (1989), ‘AChanging Street Life in a Changing Society’, In Places, Vol:6, 8-16. SanFrancisco: College of Environmental Design UC Berkeley. Gehl, J., & Gemzoe, L.,(2000), ‘ New City spaces.’ Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
  7. Habermas, J. (1989). ‘The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category Bourgeois Society’. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  8. Halbwachs, M., (1952).,’ On Collective Memory.’ Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Hayden, D.,(1996).,’ The Power of Places: Urban landscapes as public history.’ In I. Borden, J. Kerr, A, Pivaro & J.Rendell (Eds.), Strangely familiar: Narratives of architecture in the city., London, England: Routledge. Jacobs, J., (1961). ‘The Death and Life of Great American Cities’, New York:Random House. 1961.
  9. Köksoy, K. G., (2009), ‘ Tarihsel alanlarda Sözlü Tarih Bilgiisne Dayalı Kentsel Tasarım Kriterlerinin Oluşturulması: Kemeraltı Anafartalar Cadddesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  10. Lofland, L., (1998). ‘The Public realm: Exploring the ci