SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Online Journal of Primary Education / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

PEDAGOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS IN PRE SCHOOL TEACHING

Muhammed Murat GÜMÜŞ
Osman KAYHAN
Özgen KORKMAZ
Halis ALTUN
Nihat YILMAZ
Pages
25–41
Publication Date
2023-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, widely used educational robots at the pre-school level, such as Kidoboto, Lego Wedo, Mbot, Lego Spike, Lego Ev3, and Matatalab, were evaluated by experts using the created rubric.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to create a rubric based on the pedagogical properties of educational robots for pre-school students and determine the compliance level with educational robot sets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, the study is considered a first and significant step toward selecting robots based on pedagogical-driven factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, widely used educational robots at the pre-school level, such as Kidoboto, Lego Wedo, Mbot, Lego Spike, Lego Ev3, and Matatalab, were evaluated by experts using the created rubric.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Educational robots · 21st-century skills · rubric

Abstract

This study aims to create a rubric based on the pedagogical properties of educational robots for pre-school students and determine the compliance level with educational robot sets. In this sense, the study is considered a first and significant step toward selecting robots based on pedagogical-driven factors. For this aim, a mixed-method research design was employed. A qualitative method was used to create the rubric items, and the rubric development was also supported through a quantitative process by including expert opinions and ensuring content validity. Furthermore, a descriptive survey model, one of the quantitative designs, was used to examine the suitability of educational robots for the pre-school education level. As an outcome of this study, a rubric of four dimensions with 28 items related to the pedagogical features of educational robots in pre-school was created. Furthermore, widely used educational robots at the pre-school level, such as Kidoboto, Lego Wedo, Mbot, Lego Spike, Lego Ev3, and Matatalab, were evaluated by experts using the created rubric.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞ, M. M., KAYHAN, O., KORKMAZ, Ö., ALTUN, H., YILMAZ, N. (2023). PEDAGOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL ROBOTS IN PRE SCHOOL TEACHING. International Online Journal of Primary Education, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 25–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/919867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ATC21S (2010). Assessment and teaching of 21st-century skills. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/citizenship/socioeconomic/docs/ATC21S_Exec_Summary.pdf
  2. Atman Uslu, N., Öztüre Yavuz, G., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2022). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890
  3. Bravo, F. A., González, A. M., & González, E. (2017). A review of intuitive robot programming environments for educational purposes. In 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC) (p. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276396
  4. Çetin, M., & Çetin, G. (2021). A Critical Outlook on MoNE Early Childhood Education Curriculum in terms of 21st-century Skills. Journal of Education for Life, 35(1), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2021351258
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2017). 30 essential skills for qualitative researchers. Anı Publishing. Simsar, H. D. A., & Yalçın, V. (2021). Examining 21st-century skills of 3-6 years old children in terms of some variables. e-Kafkas Journal of Education Research, 8, 281-303. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.941467
  6. Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study, Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
  7. ISTE (2019). The ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) National Educational Technology Standards (NETS-S) and Performance Indicators for Students. Retrieved April 17, 2022, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students
  8. Kalemkuş, F., & Bulut Özek, M. (2021). Research Trends of the 21th Century Skills: 2000-2020 (January). MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 10(2), 878-900. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.774848
  9. Katz, L. G. (2010). STEM in the early years. SEED (STEM in early education and development) Conference, Cedar Falls, IOWA. Retrieved from http://ecrp.illinois.edu/beyond/seed/katz.html
  10. Kaya, M., Korkmaz, Ö., & Çakır, R. (2020 The effect of gamified robotics activities on the problem solving and the computational thinking skills of the secondary school students. Ege Journal of Education, 21(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.588512
  11. Khodabandelou, R., & Alhoqani, K. (2022). The effects of WeDo 2.0 robot workshop on Omani grade 5 students’ acquisition of the computational thinking concepts and acceptance of the robot technology. Educa