Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2010 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4

LOJİSTİK YETENEKLERİN, STRATEJİ - PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ: KOBİ’LER ÜZERİNDE BİR SAHA ARAŞTIRMASI

Pages
1–21
Publication Date
2011-07-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover the mediating role of logistics capabilities on the relationship between strategy and business performance has been revealed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the industries which have low level entrance costs, the SME’s which manage their resources effectively, develop strategies appropriate to their flexible and agile structures and support those strategies with effective supply chain management can gain competitive advantage and challenge with large firms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context the effects of logistics capabilities on SME’s strategy – performance relationship have been explored. 238 questionnaires from owners or executives of 121 manufacturing SME’s which operating in Marmara Region of Turkey have been used to solve the research questions which about neglected subject in the strategic management researches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover the mediating role of logistics capabilities on the relationship between strategy and business performance has been revealed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lojistik Yetenekler · Rekabetçi Strateji · KOBİ’ler

Abstract

In the industries which have low level entrance costs, the SME’s which manage their resources effectively, develop strategies appropriate to their flexible and agile structures and support those strategies with effective supply chain management can gain competitive advantage and challenge with large firms. This study emphasizes on logistics capabilities which have vital importance within the supply chain. In this context the effects of logistics capabilities on SME’s strategy – performance relationship have been explored. 238 questionnaires from owners or executives of 121 manufacturing SME’s which operating in Marmara Region of Turkey have been used to solve the research questions which about neglected subject in the strategic management researches. The database analyzed by SPSS v.15 statistical program through developed hypothesis. According to the findings of this research supported the positive effects of logistics capabilities on business performance. Moreover the mediating role of logistics capabilities on the relationship between strategy and business performance has been revealed.

Özet

Giriş maliyetlerinin düşük olduğu sektörlerde kaynaklarını etkin olarak yöneten, çevik ve esnek yapılarına uygun stratejiler geliştirerek bu stratejileri etkili bir tedarik zinciri yönetimi ile destekleyen KOBİ’ler rekabet avantajı sağlayabilmekte ve büyük işletmelerle mücadele edebilmektedirler. Bu çalışma etkili bir tedarik zinciri yaratmak için yaşamsal öneme sahip olan lojistik yeteneklere vurgu yapmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, lojistik yeteneklerin KOBİ’lerde strateji - performans ilişkisi üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Stratejik yönetim araştırmalarında genellikle ihmal edilen bu konu hakkındaki araştırma sorunsalını çözümlemek için Marmara bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren KOBİ niteliğindeki 121 üretim işletmesinden elde edilen 238 adet anketin verileri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veri tabanı geliştirilen hipotezler doğrultusunda SPSS 15 istatistik paket programı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları lojistik yeteneklerin işletme performansı üzerindeki etkisini desteklemesinin yanı sıra rekabet stratejilerinin işletme performansı üzerindeki etkilerinde de kısmi olarak ara değişken rolü oynadığını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, A. (2011). LOJİSTİK YETENEKLERİN, STRATEJİ - PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ: KOBİ’LER ÜZERİNDE BİR SAHA ARAŞTIRMASI. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 1–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/916858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Amit, R. ve Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993) “Strategic assets and organizational rents”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, ss.33-46.
  2. Antoncic, B. ve Hisrich, R.D. (2001) “Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, ss.495-527.
  3. Arıkan, R. (2004) Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Hazırlama, Asil Yayın, Ankara.
  4. Azevedo, S. ve Ferreira, J.M. (2007) “The Linkage between Logistics Activities and Firms' Performance: An Empirical Study”, Proceedings of the Four Annual Conference of Applied Business and Entrepreneurship Association International (ABEAI), 16th-20th November, Maui Hawaii. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030287
  5. Bagozzi, R.P. ve Phillips, L.W. (1982) “Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construct”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, ss.459-89.
  6. Bagozzi, R.P. ve Phillips, L.W. (1991) “Assessing construct validity in organizational research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, ss.421-58.
  7. Baker, W.E. ve Sinkula, J.M. (1999) “The synergistic effects of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), ss.411-27.
  8. Barney, J.B. (1986) “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy”, Management Science, 32(10), ss.1231-41.
  9. Barney, J.B. (1988) “Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: reconsidering the related hypothesis”, Strategic Management Journal, 9, ss.71-8.
  10. Barney, J.B. (1991) “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1), ss.99-120.
  11. Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986) “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic ve statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality ve Social Psychology, 51(6), ss.1173-82.
  12. Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables: A Leading, Readable Text on Structural Modeling, Wiley, New York. Bowersox, D.J., Daugherty, P.J., Droge, C.L., Germain, R.N. ve Rogers, D.S. (1992) Logistical Excellence: It's Not Business as Usual, Digital Press,
  13. Burlington, MA. Bowersox, D.J., Daugherty, P.J., Droge, C.L., Rogers, D.S. ve Wardlow, D.L. (1989) Leading Edge Logistics: Competitive Positioning for the 1990s,
  14. The Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J, ve Cooper, B.M. (2002)
  15. Supply Chain Logistics Management, Int.ed. The McGraw-Hill. Brislin, R.W. (1970) “Back-translation for cross-cultural research