SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2014 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

-

"Bütçe Saydamlığı ve Ekonomik Özgürlüğün Yolsuzluk Üzerindeki Etkisi"

Gül KAYALIDERE
Pages
219–234
Publication Date
2014-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, a negative and strong relationship has been discerned between corruption and budget transparency and economic freedoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Corruption is a important element that has a negative influence on economic growth and development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the sample of the study, countries for which full data could be accessed in terms of these three variables for the 2006-2012 periods were selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, a negative and strong relationship has been discerned between corruption and budget transparency and economic freedoms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bütçe Saydamlığı · Ekonomik Özgürlük · Yolsuzluk

Abstract

Corruption is a important element that has a negative influence on economic growth and development. The effect of budget transparency and economic freedoms in preventing corruption is increasingly acknowledged. In this current study, the relationship between budget transparency and economic freedoms and corruption are investigated. As the sample of the study, countries for which full data could be accessed in terms of these three variables for the 2006-2012 periods were selected. Firstly, correlation coefficients for each variable were calculated. In conclusion, a negative and strong relationship has been discerned between corruption and budget transparency and economic freedoms. In addition, the relationships among variables have been analyzed thorough with the help of cross section regression analysis. It was found that as the level of budget transparency and economic freedoms increases, the level of corruption reduces.

Özet

Yolsuzluk, ekonomik büyüme ve kalkınmayı olumsuz etkileyen önemli bir unsurdur. Yolsuzluğu önlemede bütçe saydamlığı ve ekonomik özgürlüklerin etkisinin olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Çalışmada, bütçe saydamlığı ve ekonomik özgürlüklerin yolsuzlukla ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu üç değişkenin, 2006-2012 dönemi için verilerine eksiksiz ulaşılabilen ülkeler seçilmiştir. İlk olarak değişkenlere ait korelasyon katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, yolsuzluk ile bütçe saydamlığı ve ekonomik özgürlükler arasında negatif ve güçlü bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Daha sonra değişkenlerin ilişkisi yatay kesit regresyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Ekonomik özgürlük ve saydamlık düzeyi arttıkça yolsuzluk düzeyinde azalma saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYALIDERE, G. (2014). -. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 219–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/916500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akçay, S. (2000), “Yolsuzluk, Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Demokrasi”, Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Güz, Cilt 1, Sayı 1, ss.1-15.
  2. Alt, J. E ve Lassen, D. D. (2006), “Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Dept in OECD Countries”, European Economic Review, 50, ss. 140314 Andeson, S. ve Heywood, P. M.(2009), “The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Trasparency International’s Approach to Measurin Corruption”, Political Studies, Vol. 57, ss.746-767.
  3. Apergis, N., Dinçer, O. C. ve Payne, J. E. (2012), “Live Free or Bribe: On the casual Dynamics Between Economic Freedom and Corruption in U.S. States”, European Journal of Political Economy, 28, ss. 215-226.
  4. Atiyas, İ. ve Sayın, Ş. (2000), “Devletin Mali Performans Saydamlığı”, Kamu Maliyesinde Saydamlık, İstanbul, TESEV Yayını, ss.27-43.
  5. Berggren, N.(2003), “The Benefits of Economic Freedom”, The Independent Review, v:VIII, n:2, ss.193-211.
  6. Biber, A.E. (2008), “Değişen Devlet Anlayışı Müdahalecilik ve Piyasa Ekonomisi”, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt:1, Sayı:16, Yıl:9, ss. 56-69.
  7. Cameroon Budget Inquirer (2013), “Why Budget Transparency”, http://cameroon.openspending.org.
  8. Egeli, H. ve Özen, A. (2011), Yolsuzluk-Mali S aydamlık İlişkisi: Teorik ve Ampirik bir Değerlendirme”, Bütçe Dünyası Dergisi, Sayı 35, No 1, ss.19-27. Freedom House, “Freedom in the World 2013”, http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world2013/methodology.
  9. Gwartney, J., Lawson R ve Hall, J.(2012), Economic Freedom of The World 2012
  10. Annual Report, Fraser Institute. Gwartney, J. ve Lawson, R. (2003), “The Consept and Measurement of Economic Freedom”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol:19, ss. 405-430.
  11. Graeff, P. ve Mehlkop, G. (2003), “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Corruption: Different Patterns for Rich and Poor Countries”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol 19, ss.605-620.
  12. Heritage Foundation (2006), 2006 Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org.
  13. Heritage Foundation (2010), 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org.
  14. Heritage Foundation (2012), 2012 Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org.
  15. Heritage Foundation (2013), “2013 Index of Economic Freedom”, http://www.heritage.org/index/about.
  16. International Budget Partnership (2006), Open Budget Survey, www.internationalbudget.org. International Budget Partnership (2008), Open Budget Survey, www.internationalbudget.org. International Budget Partnership (2010), Open Budget Survey, www.internationalbudget.org. International Bud