SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2015 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3

-

ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET ALGISININ İŞ TATMİNİ, ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIK VE İŞ PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: OKUL ÖNCESİ ÖĞRETMENLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Sabiha SEVİNÇ ALTAŞ
Hülya GÜNDÜZ ÇEKMECELİOĞLU
Pages
421–439
Publication Date
2015-08-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also the research indicated that distributive justice and procedural justice had positive effect on job performance

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational justice and fairness are fundamental concepts in the workplace and distributive and procedural justice are two dimensions of organizational justice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this research is to examine the effects of procedural and distributive justice on preschool teacher’s organizational commitment, job satisfaction and job performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also the research indicated that distributive justice and procedural justice had positive effect on job performance
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dağıtımsal Adalet · Prosedürel Adalet · İş Tatmini

Abstract

Organizational justice and fairness are fundamental concepts in the workplace and distributive and procedural justice are two dimensions of organizational justice. The aim of this research is to examine the effects of procedural and distributive justice on preschool teacher’s organizational commitment, job satisfaction and job performance. In this scope a research was carried out on 125 teachers of preschool in Sakarya. Results of research indicated that both forms of organizational justice had positive effects on job satisfaction, however only distributive justice, but not procedural justice, had a significant impact on organizational commitment. Also the research indicated that distributive justice and procedural justice had positive effect on job performance

Özet

Örgütsel adalet ve eşitlik kavramları işyerlerinin temelini oluşturmaktadır. Örgütsel adalet, prosedürel ve dağıtımsal adalet olmak üzere iki boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin örgütsel bağlılık, iş tatmini ve iş performansı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaçla araştırma Sakarya’da çalışan 125 okul öncesi öğretmeni üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar örgütsel adaletin iki formunun da iş tatmini üzerinde pozitif etkilere sahip olduğunu, ancak sadece dağıtımsal adaletin örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca araştırma sonuçları, hem prosedürel hem de dağıtımsal adaletin iş performansını pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAŞ, S. S., ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, H. G. (2015). -. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 3, 421–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/916418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Allen, Natalie.J. ve Meyer, John P. (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organisation”, Journal of Occupational psychology, 63, ss.1-18.
  2. Becker, Howard S. (1960) “Notes On the Concept of Commitment”, The American Journal of Sociology, (10 Nisan 2006).
  3. Becker, T. E. (1992). “Foci and bases of commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, ss.232-244
  4. Benligiray, S. (2004).
  5. İnsan kaynakları yönetimi. Eskişehir, Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  6. Beugre, C. D. (2002). “Understanding Organizational Justice and its İmpact on managing Employees: An African perspective”, Journal of Human Ressource Management, 13, ss.1091-1104.
  7. Bies, R. J. ve Moag, J. F. (1986), “Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness”, Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 1, ss. 43–55.
  8. Bies, R. J., ve Moag, J. S. (1987), “Interactional justice: Communications criteria of fairness”, In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, ve M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research in Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1, ss. 43–55).
  9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  10. Brief, A.P. Attitudes In and Around Organizations, California: SAGE Publications, 1998.
  11. Camerman J., Cropanzano R. Ve Vandenberghe C. (2007). “The Benefits of Justice for Temporary Workers”, Group & Organization Management, 32, ss. 176-207.
  12. Cohen- Charash, Yochi ve Spector, P.E. (2001), “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, ss.278-321.
  13. Colquitt, J. A. (2001), “On The Dimensionality Of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of A Measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, ss. 386–400.
  14. Cropanzano, R. (Ed.) (1993). “Justice in the worlc;place'Appmachin~ fairne.~~in human resource manaiement HilIsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cropanzano R., Bowen D.E. ve Gilliland S.W. (2001), “The Management of Organizational Justice”, Academy of Management Perspectives, November, ss. 34-48.
  15. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., ve Gilliland, S. W. (2007), “The management of organizational justice”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, ss. 34-48.
  16. Çakar D.N. ve Yıldız S. (2009), “Örgütsel Adaletin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: ‘Algılanan Örgütsel Destek’ Bir Ara Değişken Mi?” Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28, ss. 68-90.
  17. Çöl, G. (2008). “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi”, 9(1), 35-46.
  18. DeConinck, J.B., ve Stilwell, D.C. (2004), “Incorpor