Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2018 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2

COMPARION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DEPOSITS BANK OF TURKEY WITH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ MEVDUAT BANKALARININ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ YÖNTEMİYLE İNCELENMESİ

Pages
487–504
Publication Date
2018-05-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study finds 11 banks were effective – two public, two private, and and seven foreign capital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effective banking industry operations which have an important place in the financial system, is very important for the development of the country's economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the economic crisis in 2000 had affected the Turkish banking sector, , it has a strong structure today, thanks to regulatory measures from the Turkish government.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study finds 11 banks were effective – two public, two private, and and seven foreign capital.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bankacılık · Etkinlik · Veri Zarflama Analizi

Abstract

Effective banking industry operations which have an important place in the financial system, is very important for the development of the country's economy. Although the economic crisis in 2000 had affected the Turkish banking sector, , it has a strong structure today, thanks to regulatory measures from the Turkish government. This study deals with the effectiveness of the Turkish banking sector. We compared and analyzed the data for the period 2012-2016. In the study the effectiveness of a total of 23 deposit banks were measured by the input-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method under the fixed return (CCR) and variable return on scale (BCC) assumptions. This study finds 11 banks were effective – two public, two private, and and seven foreign capital.

Özet

Finansal sistem içerisinde önemli bir yere sahip olan bankacılık sektörünün etkin bir şekilde faaliyet göstermesi ülke ekonomilerinin gelişimi açısından oldukça önemlidir. 2000 yılında yaşanan ekonomik kriz her ne kadar Türk bankacılık sektörünü etkilese de alınan birçok önlem sayesinde bu sektör günümüzde çok güçlü bir yapıya sahiptir. Türk bankacılık sektörünün etkinliğini ele alan bu çalışmada Türkiye’de faaliyet göstermekte olan mevduat bankalarının etkinlik düzeyleri 2012-2016 dönemi için karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada toplam 23 mevduat bankasının etkinliği ölçeğe göre sabit getiri (CCR) ve ölçeğe göre değişken getiri (BCC) varsayımları altında girdi odaklı Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) yöntemiyle ölçülmüştür. Çalışma sonucunda iki kamu bankası iki özel sermayeli banka ve yedi yabancı sermayeli banka etkin bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, K. A., OKTAY, E. (2018). COMPARION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF DEPOSITS BANK OF TURKEY WITH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 487–504. https://ajindex.com/articles/916344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bektaş, H. (2013). “Türk bankacılık sektöründe etkinlik analizi”. Sosyoekonomi, 19 (19). Bhagavath, V. (2009). “Technical efficiency measurement by data envelopment analysis: An application in transportation”. Alliance Journal of Business Research, 1 (1), 60-72.
  2. Budak, H. (2011). “Veri zarflama analizi ve Türk bankacılık sektöründe uygulaması”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 23 (3), 95-110.
  3. Casu, B., Girardone, C. (2009). “Testing the relationship between competition and efficiency in banking: A panel data analysis”. Economics Letters, 105 (1), 134-137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.06.018
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6), 429-444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  5. Chen, X., Skully, M., Brown, K. (2005). “Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993–2000”. China Economic Review, 16 (3), 229-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2005.02.001
  6. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Zhu, J. (2011). “Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations”. W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford ve J. Zhu (Ed.). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis (ss. 1-39).
  7. Boston, MA: Springer US. Çatalbaş, G. K., Atan, M. (2005). “Bankacılıkta etkinlik ve sermaye yapısının bankaların etkinliğine etkisi”. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 20 (237), 49-62.
  8. Er, B., Uysal, M. (2012). “Türkiye'deki ticari bankalar ve katılım bankalarının karşılaştırmalı etkinlik analizi: 2005-2010 dönemi değerlendirmesi”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26 (3-4).
  9. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K., Schmidt, S. S. (2008). The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth: Oxford University Press.Golany, B., Yu, G. (1997). “Estimating returns to scale in DEA”. European Journal of Operational Research, 103 (1), 28-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00259-7
  10. Ağırman, E., Serçemeli, M., Özcan, M. (2013, 4th-5th October 2013). Shadow Banking: An Overview. Paper presented at the 9th Iberian International Business Conference, Braga-Portugal. Jemric, I., Vujcic, B. (2002). “Efficiency of Banks in Croatia: A DEA Approach”. Comparative Economic Studies, 44 (2), 169-193. doi: 10.1057/ces.2002.13 Mukherjee, A., Nath, P., Pal, M. (2003). “Resource, service quality and performance triad: a framework for measuring efficiency of banking services”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54