SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2019 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4

Why Energy Market Liberalisation is Essential for Turkey to Embark on Climate-Energy Policy Integration in the EU

Enerji Piyasasının Liberalizasyonunun Türkiye’nin AB’nin İklim ile Enerji Politikalarının Bütünleşmesine İntibak Etmesindeki Önemi

Feza Sencer ÇÖRTOĞLU
İşıl Şirin SELÇUK
Pages
1167–1185
Publication Date
2019-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, in this paper the role of energy market liberalisation as a milestone for climate and energy integration within the overall process of EU Climate Policy is also examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The climate policy is an inter-sectoral policy area which requires integration of climate policy with several policy areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper looks at the Climate Policy Integration (CIP) from the perspective of climate and energy policy integration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, in this paper the role of energy market liberalisation as a milestone for climate and energy integration within the overall process of EU Climate Policy is also examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İklim Politikası · Enerji Politikası · Politikanın Bütünleşmesi

Abstract

The climate policy is an inter-sectoral policy area which requires integration of climate policy with several policy areas. This paper looks at the Climate Policy Integration (CIP) from the perspective of climate and energy policy integration. Initially, it is aimed to make conceptual clarification of policy integration and to analyze the main features of CIP. Furthermore, in this paper the role of energy market liberalisation as a milestone for climate and energy integration within the overall process of EU Climate Policy is also examined. By considering the energy market liberalisation as a crucial stage for EU climate-energy policy integration, Turkey’s climate policy in general and the results of energy market liberalisation by taking into account the share of renewable energy sources of the country are explored in order to evaluate Turkey’s ability to align itself to EU Climate Policy.

Özet

İklim politikası, sektörler-arası bir politika alanı olarak iklim politikasının çeşitli politika alanları ile bütünleşmesini gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışma İklim Politikasının Bütünleşmesi’ne (İPB) iklim ve enerji politikalarının bütünleşmesi açısından bakmaktadır. İlk olarak çalışmada, politikanın bütünleşmesinin kavramsal açıklamasının yapılması ve İPB’nin temel özelliklerinin analiz edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bunun yanında enerji piyasasının liberalizasyonunun, iklim ile enerji politikalarının bütünleşmesinde köşe taşı olması, AB İklim Politikasının genel gelişimi açısından ele alınmaktadır. Enerji piyasasının liberalizasyonunun AB iklim ile enerji politikalarının bütünleşmesinde oynadığı kritik rolü dikkate alarak, genel olarak Türkiye’nin iklim politikası ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının ülkedeki payı hesaba katılarak enerji piyasasının liberalizasyonu, Türkiye’nin AB İklim Politikasına intibak etme yeteneğinin değerlendirilmesi bakımından incelenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇÖRTOĞLU, F. S., SELÇUK, İ. Ş. (2019). Why Energy Market Liberalisation is Essential for Turkey to Embark on Climate-Energy Policy Integration in the EU. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4, 1167–1185. https://ajindex.com/articles/916229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Merino, D., Ebrill, A. (2017), Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring the Internal Electricity and Gas Markets in 2016:
  2. Electricity Wholesale Markets Volume, Electricity Wholesale Markets. Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators and the Council of European Energy Regulators. Adelle, C., Pallemaerts, M. and Chiavari, J. (2009), Climate Change and Energy Security in Europe: Policy Integration and its Limits. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. Beg, N., Morlot, J. C., Davidson, O., Yaw, A., Tyani, L., Denton, F., Sokona, Y. et al. (2002), "Linkages between Climate Change and Sustainable Development." Climate Policy 2 (2): 129–144. doi:10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00028-1.
  3. Berkhout, F. (2005), "Rationales for Adaptation in EU Climate Change Policies." Climate Policy 5 (3): 377–391. doi:10.1080/14693062.2005.9685564. Carvalho, M. G. (2012), "EU Energy and Climate Change Strategy." Energy 40 (1): 19–22. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.012. Council of the European Union. (1999), Helsinki European Council Presidency Conclusions, 10-11 December 1999, p.1-33.
  4. Council of the European Union. (2008), Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package, 2874th Council Meeting, C/08/149, 9959/08. Dupont, C. (2010), Political Commitment to Climate Policy Integration at EU Level: The Case of Biodiversity Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1691610. Dupont, C., and Oberthür, S. (2012), "Insufficient Climate Policy Integration in EU Energy Policy: The Importance of the Long‐Term Perspective." Journal of Contemporary European Research 8 (2): 228–247.
  5. Dupont, C., and Primova, R. (2011), "Combating Complexity: The Integration of EU Climate and Energy Policies." In Energy and Environment in Europe: Assessing a Complex Relationship, edited by J. Tosun and I Solorio, Mini Issue 1,Vol. 15, Article 8. European Integration Online Papers. Energy Market Regulatory Authority. (2018), "Official Web Site." Accessed 06 November 2018. https://csb.gov.tr
  6. Environment Fifth Action Programme. (1993), "EU Fifth Environment Action Programme Towards Sustainability." Journal of the European Communities C 138, 17.5.1993, p.5-98.
  7. Environment Sixth Action Programme. (2002), "EU Sixth Environment Action Programme " Journal of the European Communities OJL 242, 10.9.2002, p.1-15. Environment Seventh Action Programme. (2013), "Living Well, Within the Limits of Our Planet." Official Journal of the European Communities OJL 354, 28.12.2013, p.171-200.
  8. European Commission. (1998), Co