Journals / Trends in Business and Economics / 2019 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4

IMPACT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM ON GROWTH: A PANEL ARDL ANALYSIS ON BRIC-T COUNTRIES

EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜN BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: BRIC-T ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR PANEL ARDL ANALİZİ

Pages
1027–1044
Publication Date
2019-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the short-run analysis, the error correction term of model works so the short-term deviations between the series’ are disappearing in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of economic freedoms on economic growth is tested with panel data analysis methods using annual data for the period 1995-2016 for BRIC-T countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Model is estimated using economic growth, business freedom, monetary freedom, public expenditures, inflation and total trade (%, GDP) variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the short-run analysis, the error correction term of model works so the short-term deviations between the series’ are disappearing in the long run.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik Özgürlük · Ekonomik Büyüme · PMG

Abstract

In this study, the effect of economic freedoms on economic growth is tested with panel data analysis methods using annual data for the period 1995-2016 for BRIC-T countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and Turkey). Model is estimated using economic growth, business freedom, monetary freedom, public expenditures, inflation and total trade (%, GDP) variables. According to the empirical analysis results obtained by panel data method, in the long run, the effect of economic freedoms on growth is positive whereas the effect of public expenditures and inflation on growth is negative. In the short-run analysis, the error correction term of model works so the short-term deviations between the series’ are disappearing in the long run.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, BRIC-T ülkeleri (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin ve Türkiye) için ekonomik özgürlük faaliyetlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi panel veri analizi yöntemiyle 1995-2016 dönemi yıllık veriler kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Değişken olarak ekonomik büyüme, özel sektör iş özgürlüğü, parasal özgürlük, kamu harcamaları, enflasyon ve ticari açıklık serileri kullanılarak model tahmin edilmiştir. Panel veri yöntemi ile elde edilen ampirik analiz sonuçlarına göre, uzun dönemde, ekonomik özgürlüklerin büyüme üzerindeki etkisi pozitif iken kamu harcamaları ve enflasyonun etkisi negatiftir. Kısa dönem analizinde, modelin hata düzeltme terimleri çalışmakta, yani seriler arasında kısa dönemde meydana gelen sapmalar, uzun dönemde ortadan kalkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAM, M. M., ŞANLI, O. (2019). IMPACT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM ON GROWTH: A PANEL ARDL ANALYSIS ON BRIC-T COUNTRIES. Trends in Business and Economics, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 4, 1027–1044. https://ajindex.com/articles/916221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acar, M. (2010) “Serbest Ticaret, Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Refah”, Bilig; Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 53, ss.1-28.
  2. Anwar, S., Quratulain & Akram, W. (2017) “Economic Freedom and Growth Nexus in Selected South Asian Countries”, Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(10), ss.40-47. Bengoa M. & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003) “Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, ss.529-45.
  3. Beşkaya, A. & Manan, Ö. (2009) “Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Demokrasi ile Ekonomik Performans Arasındaki İlişkinin Zaman Serileri ile Analizi: Türkiye Örneği”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, ss.47–76.
  4. Clark, J.R., & Lawson, R.A. (2008) “The Impact of Economic Growth, Tax Policy, and Economic Freedom on Income Inequality”, Journal of Private Enterprise, 24, ss.23–31.
  5. Çetin, R. (2013) “Ekonomik Özgürlüğün Gelir Düzeyi Üzerindeki Etkisinin Panel Veri Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(2), ss.37- 47. Dawson, J.W. (1998) “Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19, ss.479 – 495. Dawson, J.W. (2003) “Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship”, European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), ss.479-495.
  6. Dickey, D. & Fuller, W.A. (1979) “Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, ss.427-431.
  7. Easton, S.T., & Walker, M.A. (1997) “Income, Growth, and Economic Freedom”, The American Economic Review, 87(2), ss.328-332.
  8. Engle, R.F. & Granger, C.W. (1987) “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica: Journal of the Society, 55, ss.251–276.
  9. Fraser Institute, Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/efw/efw2017/efw-2017-chapter-1.pdf (Erişim: 10.04.2018).
  10. Gujarati, D.N. (1999),
  11. Temel Ekonometri, Çev. Ümit Şenesen, Gülay Günlük Şenesen, Literatür Yayıncılık, 7. Basım, Eylül 2010,
  12. İstanbul.
  13. Güney, T. (2017) “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Açısından Ekonomik Özgürlüğün Önemi: Panel Veri Analizi”, KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 19(32), ss.8-14.
  14. Gwartney, J.D. Lawson, R.D. & Holcombe, R.G. (1996) “Economic Freedom and Environment for Economic Growth”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(4), ss.643-663.
  15. Gwartney, L. & Lawson, R. (2004), Economic Freedom of The World: 2004, Annual Repo