SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Does Unionization Rate Accelerate Flight of Capital?: Panel Analysis

Cuneyt Koyuncu
İsmail Hakkı İşcan
Pages
13–22
Publication Date
2018-09-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained in the literature show that unions, always act in the favor of protective policies, resisted against policies which support both free trade and FDI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; min-height: 14.0px} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 10.1px; font: 10.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #2d2829} span.s1 {font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #000000} Economic stability, political stability, market structure, market size, trade openness, and various regulations related to tax advantages have crucial importance to attract foreign direct investments (FDI) to an economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As unionization causes increase in the wages and brings some fringe benefits to labors which are extra financial burdens for employers, the profit of an enterprise reduces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained in the literature show that unions, always act in the favor of protective policies, resisted against policies which support both free trade and FDI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Trade unions · Unionization Rate · Foreign Direct Investment

Özet

Öz p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; min-height: 14.0px} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 10.1px; font: 10.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #2d2829} span.s1 {font: 12.0px 'Minion Pro'; color: #000000} Economic stability, political stability, market structure, market size, trade openness, and various regulations related to tax advantages have crucial importance to attract foreign direct investments (FDI) to an economy. In addition to the factor aforementioned, One of the other potential determinants for foreign direct investments (FDI) inflow might be the degree of unionization tendency in a particular host country. As unionization causes increase in the wages and brings some fringe benefits to labors which are extra financial burdens for employers, the profit of an enterprise reduces. Owing to this fact, willingness to invest of entrepreneurs diminishes and right after they may redirect their investment to abroad. Therefore, unionization rate may discourage investors and speed up the capital flight. This study investigates the association between unionization rate and capital outflow by using panel data. Our prior expectation is a positive relationship between unionization rate and capital flight. The findings obtained in the literature show that unions, always act in the favor of protective policies, resisted against policies which support both free trade and FDI.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koyuncu, C., İşcan, İ. H. (2018). Does Unionization Rate Accelerate Flight of Capital?: Panel Analysis. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 13–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/9148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bellak, C. M. Leibrecht & Rield, A. (2008). Labour Costs and FDI Flows into Central and Eastern European Countries: A Survey of the Literature and Empirical Evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(1), 17-37.
  2. Brandl, B., S. Strohmer and Traxler, F. (2010). US foreign direct investment, macro markets and labour relations: the case of enlarged Europe. Industrial Relations Journal, 41(6), 622-638.
  3. Cooke, W. N. (1997). The Influence of Industrial Relations Factors on U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Abroad. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51(1), 3-17.
  4. Cooke, W. N. (2003). The Influence of Industrial Relations System Factors on Foreign Direct Investment. In: Cooke W (ed.) Multinational Companies and Global Human Resource Strategies. Westport: Quorum Books, 65-86.
  5. Cooke, W. N. & Noble, D. S. (1998). Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36, 581-609.
  6. Gross, D. M. & Ryan, M. J. (2008). FDI location and size: Does employment protection legislation matter? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(6), 590–605.
  7. Ishida, J. & Matsushima, N. (2005). Outward Foreign Direct Investment in Unionized Oligopoly: Some Welfare Implications. Discussion Paper, 2005-39, Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University. Kinkel, S. and Zanker, C. (2007),.Globale Produktionsstrategien in der Automobilzulieferindustrie. Berlin: Springer. Krzywdzinski, M. (2014). Do Investors Avoid Strong Trade Unions and Labour Regulation? Social Dumping in the European Automotive and Chemical Industries. Work, Employment & Society: A Journal of the British Sociological Association, 28(6), 926–945.
  8. Leahy, D. & Montagna, C. (2005). Union Legislation and Export Platform FDI. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(4), 437–452.
  9. Lommerud, K. E., Meland, F. and Straume, O.R. (2005). Can Deunionization Lead to International Outsourcing? Cesifo Working Paper No. 1545, 1-28.
  10. Mukherjee, A. & Suetrong, K. (2007). Unionisation Structure and Strategic Foreign Direct Investment. Research Paper Series, Globalisation and Labour Markets, Research Paper No: 2007/22, 1-27.
  11. Naylor, R. & Santoni, M. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Wage Bargaining. J. Int. Trade & Economic Development, 12(1), 1–18.
  12. Radulescu, R. & Robson, M. (2008).
  13. Trade Unions, Wage Bargaining Coordination and Foreign Direct Investment. Labour, 22(4), 661-678.
  14. Skaksen, M. Y. & Sørensen, J. R. (2001). Should Trade Union Appreci