SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TESAM Akademi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Change in Japanese Foreign Policy during the Shinzo Abe Period

ŞİNZO ABE DÖNEMİNDE JAPON DIŞ POLİTİKASINDA YAŞANAN DEĞİŞİM

Emine Akçadağ Alagöz(İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
11–37
Publication Date
2018-07-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally it argues that the purpose of the original policy has changed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to investigate why there is a change in Japan’s foreign policy after Shinzo Abe’s accession to power for the second time in December 2012 and whether this change occurred only in the level of means or the goal that the policy addresses is replaced.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to seek an analytical explanation of these questions by conducting an examination of Abe’s foreign policy through Charles Hermann’s model for foreign policy change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally it argues that the purpose of the original policy has changed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Barış ve Güvenlik Yasası · Dış Politika Değişimi · Japonya

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate why there is a change in Japan’s foreign policy after Shinzo Abe’s accession to power for the second time in December 2012 and whether this change occurred only in the level of means or the goal that the policy addresses is replaced. The purpose of this study is to seek an analytical explanation of these questions by conducting an examination of Abe’s foreign policy through Charles Hermann’s model for foreign policy change. By applying this explanatory model to Japan’s foreign policy under the Abe administration, this paper attempts to address the sources of change, the intermediate step of decision-making and the level of change. Within this framework, this study first examines Abe’s leadership and bureaucratic advocacy as major sources of change. Then, it draws a picture of decision making process which fundamentally controls the direction of foreign policy change. Finally it argues that the purpose of the original policy has changed.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Başbakan Şinzo Abe’nin Aralık 2012’de ikinci kez göreve gelmesinden sonra neden Japon dış politikasında değişim yaşandığı ve bu değişimin sadece kullanılan araçlar düzeyin de mi kaldığı yoksa dış politikanın temel amacının mı yeniden şekillendiği sorularına cevap aramaktır. Çalışma, Charles Hermann’ın dış politika değişim modeli kapsamında Abe’nin dış politikasını inceleyerek, bu sorulara analitik bir açıklama getirmeyi hedeflemektedir. Söz konusu açıklayıcı model Abe yönetiminin izlediği dış politikaya uygulanarak, değişimi doğuran kaynaklar, ara basamak olan karar alma süreci ve değişimin düzeyi ele alınacaktır. Bu çerçevede öncelikle Abe’nin liderliği ve bürokrasinin desteği temel kaynakları olarak incelenecektir. Akabinde dış politika değişiminin yönünü tayin eden karar alma süreci irdelenecektir. Son olarak ise dış politikanın temel hedefinin değiştiği ortaya koyulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alagöz, E. A. (2018). Change in Japanese Foreign Policy during the Shinzo Abe Period. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.455994

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Abe, S. (2007). Towards a beautiful country: My vision for Japan. New York: Vertical.
  2. Abe, S. (2012). Asia’s democratic security diamond, project syndicate. Retrieved from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe?barrier=accessreg
  3. Akçadağ, E. (2010). Yumuşak güç Japonya’nın sert güç arayışları. Bilge Strateji, 2(3), 1-28.
  4. Akimoto, D. (2016). Exercising the right to collective self-defense? An analysis of “Japan’s peace and security legislation”. ZJapanR, 41, 137–163. Retrieved from http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2017-03-31/s001/s025/pdf/article.pdf
  5. Alagöz Akçadağ, E. (2015). Japonya’nın yeni güvenlik yasası: Pasifizmin sonu mu?. Bilgesam. http://www.bilgesam.org/incele/2178/-japonya-nin-yeni-guvenlik-yasasi--pasifizmin-sonu-mu-/#.WskN6tRubIU
  6. Annual White Paper. (2014). Defense of Japan. Retrieved from http://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/pdf/2014/DOJ2014_2-1-2_web_1031.pdf
  7. Aoki, M. (2015). Abe wants to enable SDF to rescue citizens overseas. Japan Times.
  8. Berkofsky, A. (2012). A Pacifict constitution for an armed empire. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  9. Bowen, R. W. (1992). Japan’s foreign policy. Political Science and Politics, 25(1), 57-73.
  10. Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and powers-The structure of international security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Goldmann, K. (1988). Change and stability in foreign policy: The problems and possibilities of detente. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  12. Hermann, C. F. (1990). Changing course: When governments choose to redirect foreign policy. lnternational Studies Quarterly, 34, 3-21.
  13. Hirose, S. (2014). Shinzo Abe’s biggest enemy: the LDP. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2014/04/shinzo-abes-biggest-enemy-the-ldp/
  14. Holsti, K. (1982). Why nations realign: Foreign policy restructuring in the postwar world. London: Allen & Unwin.
  15. Hughes, C. (2015). Japan’s foreign policy and security policy under the Abe Doctrine. London: Palgrave.
  16. Japan Times. (2015). Komeito agrees to permanent law on dispatch of SDF.
  17. Japanese Constitution. (1947). Retrieved from https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
  18. Kato, N. (2014). Tea party politics in Japan. New York Times.
  19. Kusunoki, A. (2017). The debate on Japan’s foreign and security policy during “The lost two decades”. International Resarch Center fo Japanese Studies. Retrieved from http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2017-03-31/s001/s025/pdf/article.pdf Kyodo News. (2018). Abe Cabinet support rate up, 54% against Constitution revision: Poll.
  20. Leake, N. (2014). The evolving relations of Japan and India. (Master Dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School, California). Retrieved from https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/44603/14Dec_Leake_Robert.pdf?sequence=1
  21. Lee, P. (2014). US signs off on Japanese collective self defense. International Policy Digest. Retrieved from https://intpolicydigest.org/2014/02/12/u-s-signs-off-on-japanese-collective-self-defense/
  22. Library of Congress. (2017). Japan: Interpretations of Article 9 of the constitution. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/law/help/japan-constitution/interpretations-article9.php
  23. Liff, A. (2017). Policy by other means: Collective self-defense and the politics of Japan’s postwar constitutional reinterpretations. Asia Policy, 24,139-172
  24. Osaki, t. & Kikuchi, D. (2017). Abe declares 2020 as goal for new constitution. Japan Times.
  25. Pugliese, G.(2017). Kantei diplomacy? Japan’s hybrid leadership in foreign and security policy. The Pacific Review, 30(2), 152-168.
  26. Rosenau, J. N.(1981). The study of political adaptation: Essays on the analysis of world politics. New York: Nichols Publishing.
  27. Samuels, R. J. (2011). Securing Japan: Tokyo’s grand strategy and the future of East Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  28. Security Treaty between Japan and the United States of America. (1951). Retrieved from http://worldjpn.grips.ac.jp/documents/texts/docs/19510908.T2E.html
  29. Wakefield, B. (2014). Abe’s Law: Domestic dimensions of Japan’s collective self-defense debate. In Shihoko Goto (Ed.), Japan’s Vision for East Asia (pp. 44-60). Washington: Wilson Center.
  30. Hermann, C. F. (1990). Changing course: When governments choose to redirect foreign policy. lnternational Studies Quarterly, 34, 3-21.