SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TESAM Akademi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Social Responsibility in the Context Of EU’s Dialogue With Businesses: A Research in the Context of Environmental Arrangements and Human Rights Attempts

AB’nin İşletmelerle Kurduğu Diyalogda Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: Çevresel Düzenlemeler ve İnsan Hakları Girişimleri Kapsamında Bir İnceleme

Pelin Sönmez(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4899-6826
Pages
359–373
Publication Date
2020-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Afterwards, corporate social responsibility concept is studied and EU’s attempts in this manner are researched in terms of legal context and strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The sustainable allocation of resource issue along with concerns in regards to rehabilitation and generalization of human rights play an increasingly important role in the context of global actor behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, the attempt of EU’s being of an organization responsible to environment and respectful to human rights is justified by favorable international contracts, laws, and strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Afterwards, corporate social responsibility concept is studied and EU’s attempts in this manner are researched in terms of legal context and strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Avrupa Birliği · kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk · sürdürülebilir kalkınma.

Abstract

The sustainable allocation of resource issue along with concerns in regards to rehabilitation and generalization of human rights play an increasingly important role in the context of global actor behavior. In this sense, the attempt of EU’s being of an organization responsible to environment and respectful to human rights is justified by favorable international contracts, laws, and strategies. On the other side, EU tries to position these concepts to the dialogue ground they created with the businesses. In this study, considering the corporate social responsibility concept, EU’s relationship with the businesses that’s being established especially after over advances since 2011 is researched. In this globe, in the first section, in general, studies in regards to international society’s sustainable development concept is being revealed. Afterwards, corporate social responsibility concept is studied and EU’s attempts in this manner are researched in terms of legal context and strategies.

Özet

Kaynakların daha sürdürülebilir kullanılması meselesi ile insan haklarını iyileştirme ve genelleştirilmeye yönelik kaygılar küresel aktör davranışlarında giderek daha önemli bir yer bulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda Avrupa Birliği (AB) çevreye karşı sorumlu ve insan haklarına daha saygılı bir organizasyon olmak çabasını taraf olduğu uluslararası sözleşmeler, çıkardığı yasalar ve stratejilerle ortaya koymaktadır. Diğer yandan AB, işletmelerle kurduğu diyalog zeminine de bu kavramları yerleştirmeye çalışmaktadır. Bu çalışmada kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramı üzerinden AB’nin işletmelerle kurmuş olduğu ilişki özellikle 2011 yılı sonrası gelişmeler üzerinden incelenmektedir. Dolayısıyla ilk bölümde genel olarak uluslararası toplumun sürdürülebilir kalkınma kapsamındaki çalışmaları ele alınmıştır. Ardından kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramı üzerinde durulmuş ve AB’nin bu kapsamdaki girişimleri hukuki çerçeve ve stratejiler üzerinden incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sönmez, P. (2020). Social Responsibility in the Context Of EU’s Dialogue With Businesses: A Research in the Context of Environmental Arrangements and Human Rights Attempts. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.788820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. AB Başkanlığı. “İlgili iş sektörlerinde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk Avrupa çok paydaşlı platformları” başlıklı Hibe Çağrısı, Erişim (15.04.2020) https://www.ab.gov.tr/_47619.html
  2. Antošová, M. ve Csikósová, A. Influence of European Union policy to Corporate Social Responsibility, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23 ( 2015 ) 733 – 737.
  3. Commission Staff Working Document Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business & Human Rights: Overview of Progress, SWD(2019) 143 final, Brussels, 20.3.2019.
  4. Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions Commission Work Programme 2020 A Union that strives for more, COM(2020) 37 final, Brussels, 29.1.2020.
  5. Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, COM(2011) 681 final, Brussels, 25.10.2011.
  6. Crowther, D. ve Aras, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, Ventus Publishing.
  7. Directive 2013/95/EU of The European Parliament and of The Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.
  8. Euractiv haberi- “New human rights laws in 2021, promises EU justice chief”, Erişim (01.05.2020) https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/new-human-rights-laws-in-2021-promises-eu-justice-chief/
  9. Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley J. Int’l L., 26, 452.
  10. Idowu, S. O., Frederiksen, C. S., Mermod, A. Y., ve Nielsen, M. E. J. (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance Theory and Practice, (2015) içerisinde; Karaosman, H., Mermod, A. Y., ve Yüksel, Ü., “Corporate Social Responsibility in the European Union: An Assessment of CSR Strategy”, 317- 336.
  11. Johannes W. H. van der Waal ve Thomas Thijssens (2020). Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119625
  12. Jones, T.M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 1980, 59-67.
  13. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility doing the most good for your company, Hoboken: Wiley.
  14. McWilliams, A. ve Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
  15. Moir, L. (2001).What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 1(2), 16-22.
  16. Muserra, A.L., Papa, M. ve Grimaldi, Francesco (2020). Sustainable development and the European Union policy on non‐financial information: An Italian empirical analysis. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 27, 22–31.
  17. O’Riordan, L., Zmuda, P., Heinemann, S. (Eds.), New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsilibity, Springer Gabler, (2015) içerisinde; Matthias Fifka ve Cristian R. Loza Adaui. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting—Administrative Burden or Competitive Advantage?, 284- 300.
  18. Porter, M.E. ve Kramer, M.R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
  19. UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Erişim (18.04.2020) https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
  20. UNDP Sustainable Development Goals, Erişim (25.03.2020) https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf