Journals / Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 26

-

SAĞLIK SEKTÖRÜNDE MOBBING: HASTANE YÖNETİCİLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA/ MOBBING IN HEALTHCARE: AN APPLICATION TO HOSPITAL MANAGERS

Pages
271–296
Publication Date
2014-07-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, age group of 29-39, females, graduated from medical career college and two-year degree and single health managers are more exposed to mobbing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With this study it is purposed to investigate mobbing in health sector and display the level of being exposed to mobbing of the managers (head physician, assistant head physician, head nurse, assistant head nurse, administrator, assistant administrator) at the Ministry of Health Hospitals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of this study is all managers (454 managers) at the ministry of health hospitals in metropolitan area of Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, age group of 29-39, females, graduated from medical career college and two-year degree and single health managers are more exposed to mobbing.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mobbing · hastane yöneticileri · Mobbing

Abstract

With this study it is purposed to investigate mobbing in health sector and display the level of being exposed to mobbing of the managers (head physician, assistant head physician, head nurse, assistant head nurse, administrator, assistant administrator) at the Ministry of Health Hospitals. The population of this study is all managers (454 managers) at the ministry of health hospitals in metropolitan area of Ankara. No sampling was chosen for the study and 54 % of managers replied to the survey (244 managers). “LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization)” was used to measure the level of being exposed to mobbing of hospital managers. Independent samples t test was used to analyze the differences of the level of being exposed to mobbing according to characteristics with two independent average scores and One Way ANOVA was used for characteristics with more than two independent average scores. Head nurses and head nurses assistants are being exposed to mobbing mostly. Also, age group of 29-39, females, graduated from medical career college and two-year degree and single health managers are more exposed to mobbing.

Özet

Özet Bu araştırmayla, mobbingin sağlık sektöründeki durumunu ortaya koymak ve Sağlık Bakanlığı hastaneleri yöneticilerinin (başhekim, başhekim yardımcısı, hastane müdürü, hastane müdür yardımcısı, başhemşire, başhemşire yardımcısı) mobbinge maruz kalma düzeylerini ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın evrenini Ankara il merkezindeki tüm Sağlık Bakanlığı hastaneleri yöneticileri oluşturmaktadır (454 kişi). Araştırmada örneklem çekilmemiş ve yöneticilerin % 54'ü ankete cevap vermiştir (244 kişi). Hastane yöneticilerinin mobbinge maruz kalma düzeyini ölçmek için “LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization) Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde mobbinge maruz kalma düzeyinin iki bağımsız ortalamaya sahip değişkenlere göre fark gösterip göstermediğinin incelenmesinde iki örnek için t testi, ikiden fazla ortalamaya sahip değişkenler için Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (One Way ANOVA) kullanılmıştır. Başhemşire ve yardımcıları en fazla mobbinge maruz kalan gruptur. 29-39 yaş grubundaki, bayan, sağlık meslek lisesi ve önlisans mezunu ve evli olmayan hastane yöneticilerinin mobbinge maruz kalma düzeylerinin de daha yüksek olduğu görülmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: mobbing, hastane yöneticileri MOBBING IN HEALTHCARE: AN APPLICATION TO HOSPITAL MANAGERS Abstract With this study it is purposed to investigate mobbing in healthcare and display the level of being exposed to mobbing of the managers (head physician, assistant head physician, head nurse, assistant head nurse, administrator, assistant administrator) at the Ministry of Health Hospitals. The population of this study is all managers (454 managers) at the ministry of health hospitals in metropolitan area of Ankara. It wasn't sampled and 54 % of managers replied to the questionnaire (244 managers). “LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization)” was used to measure the level of being exposed to mobbing of hospital managers. Independent samples t test was used to analyze the differences of the level of being exposed to mobbing according to characteristics with two independent average scores, One Way ANOVA was used for characteristics with more than two independent average scores. Head nurses and head nurses assistants are the most being exposed to mobbing. Also, Age group of 29-39, females, gratuated from medical career college and two-year degree and single health managers are more being exposed to mobbing. Key Words: mobbing, hospital managers

🔖

Cite This Article

Karsavuran, S. (2014). -. Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 26, 271–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/910958

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Kaynakça Agervold, M. (2007). “Bullying at Work: A Discussion of Definitions and Prevalence, Based on An Empirical Study”. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 48. s.161–172.
  2. Aksoy, F. (2008). Psikolojik Şiddet'in (Mobbing) Sağlık Çalışanlarına Etkisi. Doktora tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi:
  3. İstanbul.
  4. Belikırık, D. (2009). Asistan Doktorlarda Yıldırma Algısı ve Bir Alan Araştırması. Yüksek lisans tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi.
  5. Clarke, J. (2002). Maymuncuk: İşyerinde İletişim ve Politika. İstanbul:
  6. Mess. Cowie, H. (1999). “Adult Bullying”. Erişim: 10 Haziran 2010. http://old.gold.ac.uk/tmr/reports/aim2_surrey1.html
  7. Cusack, S. (2000). “Workplace Bullying: Icebergs in Sight, Soundings Needed.” The Lancet. Vol.356. December 23/30. s.2118. Çakır, Ö. (2008). “Türkiye'de Kadının Çalışma Yaşamından Dışlanması.” Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:31, Temmuz-Aralık. s.25-47.
  8. Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2005).
  9. Mobbing, İş Yerinde Duygusal Saldırı ve Mücadele Yöntemleri. İstanbul:
  10. Timaş Yayınları.
  11. Çöl, S. (2008). “İşyerinde Psikolojik Şiddet: Hastane Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma.” Çalışma ve Toplum. 4. s.107-134.
  12. Davenport, N., Distler-Schwartz, R. ve Pursell-Elliott, G. (2003).
  13. Mobbing, İşyerinde Duygusal Taciz. (O. C. Önertoy, Çev.). İstanbul:
  14. Sistem Yayıncılık (1999).
  15. Di Martino, V., Hoel, H. ve Cooper, C. (2003). “Preventing Violence and Harassment in The Workplace.” European Foundation for The İmprovement of Living And Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Dilman, T. (2007). Özel Hastanelerde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Duygusal Tacize Maruz Kalma Durumlarının Belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Dökmen, Ü. (2008). Yaşama Yerleşmek. İstanbul:
  18. Remzi Kitabevi.
  19. Dursun, S. ve Aytaç, S. (2011). “İşyerindeki Şiddet Davranışlarının Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Uygulama.” Tisk Akademi. 6 (11). s.8. Dündar, T. (2010). Sağlık Çalışanlarının Yıldırmaya Maruz Kalmalarında Hastane Etik İklimi ile Sosyodemografik Özelliklerinin Rolü: Bolu İli Hastanelerinde Bir Araştırma. Yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  20. Ankara.
  21. Einarsen, S. (1999). “The Nature and Causes of Bullying at Work.” International Journal of Manpower. 20, 1/2, s.16-27.
  22. Einarsen, S. (2000). “Harassment and Bullying at Work: A Review of The Scandinavian Approach.” Aggresion and Violent Behavior. 5 (4), s.379-401.
  23. Einarsen, S. ve Raknes, B.I. (1997). “Harrasment in the Workplace and the Victimization of Me