Journals / Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 44

EVALUATION OF READING MOTIVATIONS OF TEACHER CANDIDATES: ERCIYES UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ OKUMA MOTİVASYONLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
332–358
Publication Date
2019-10-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study, 85% of the prospective teachers were found to have high reading motivation; however, it was concluded that most of them only read to do homework and therefore went to the library.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the reading views of the teacher candidates studying in Turkish Education and Social Sciences were determined in the context of the text type and reading purpose and examined reading attitude profiles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study population consisted of 75 pre-service teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study, 85% of the prospective teachers were found to have high reading motivation; however, it was concluded that most of them only read to do homework and therefore went to the library.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Okuma · okuma profili · Reading

Abstract

In this study, the reading views of the teacher candidates studying in Turkish Education and Social Sciences were determined in the context of the text type and reading purpose and examined reading attitude profiles. The research was designed as a quantitative study in the direction of screening. The study population consisted of 75 pre-service teachers. The data collection tool formu ‘Motivation to Read Profile’ adapted by Ülper and Çeliktürk (2013) was used. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data and the data were evaluated in IBM SPSS Statistics 21 statistical package program. Chi- Square test was used to test the normality of the data and appropriate statistical tests were performed. In the study, 85% of the prospective teachers were found to have high reading motivation; however, it was concluded that most of them only read to do homework and therefore went to the library. While reading, the more narrative texts of Turkish teacher candidates (69.4%); It was determined that the candidates in social studies preferred informative text type (73.7%). In both chapters, although the reading motivation of the prospective teachers is high, the number of books read, the time of reading, the purpose of reading, etc. are read. The difference in the preferences for the criteria was not significant.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Türkçe Eğitimi ve Sosyal Bilimlerde öğrenim görmekte olan öğretmen adaylarının okuma görünümleri metin türü ve okuma amacı bağlamında belirlenmiş ve okuma tutum profilleri incelemiştir. Araştırma tarama yönünde nicel bir araştırma olarak tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma evrenini 75 öğretmen adayı oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak Ülper ve Çeliktürk (2013) tarafından uyarlanan “Motivation to Read Profile” görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde tanımlayıcı istatistik kullanılmış ve veriler IBM SPSS Statistics 21 istatistik paket programında değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin normalliğine Chi- Square testi ile bakılıp uygun istatistiksel testler yapılmıştır. Araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının %85’inin okuma güdüsünün yüksek olduğu; ancak çoğunun sadece ödev yapmak için okuma yaptığı ve bu nedenle kütüphaneye gittiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Okuma yaparken Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının daha çok anlatı metnini (%69,4); sosyal bilgilerdeki adayların ise bilgilendirici metin türünü (%73,7) tercih ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Her iki bölümde de öğretmen adaylarının okuma güdüleri yüksek olmasına rağmen yılda okunan ve edinilen kitap sayısı, okuma saati, okuma amacı vb. ölçütlere yönelik tercihlerinde aradaki farkın anlamlı olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, R., GÖÇER, A. (2019). EVALUATION OF READING MOTIVATIONS OF TEACHER CANDIDATES: ERCIYES UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION. Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 44, 332–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/910638

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akarsu, O. ve Darıyemez, T. (2014). The reading habits of universty students studying english language and literatüre in the digital age, Journal of Language and Liguistic Studies, 10(2), 85-99.
  2. Akpınar, R. (2012). Anketler ve anket soruları. Ankara:
  3. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Aram, D. & Meidan, I.C.& Deitcher, D. (2016). A comparison between homeschooled and formally schooled kindergartners: children’s early literacy, mothers’ beliefs, and writing mediation, Reading Psychology 37, 995-1024.
  4. Arslan, Y.; Çelik, Z. ve Çelik, E. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin okuma alışkanlığına yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 26, 113-124.
  5. Bamberger, R. (1975). Promoting the reading habit. France: The Unesco Press.
  6. Baş, G. (2012). Reading attitudes of high school students: an analysis from different variables, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their İmplications, 3(2), 47-58.
  7. Balcı, A. (2013). Okuma ve anlama eğitimi. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Baron, N.; Calixte, R. & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: an exploratory study, Telematics and Informatics 34, 590- 604. Bashiruddin, A. (2018). Teacher development and teacher education in developing countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bayat, N. ve Çetinkaya, G. (2018). Reading habits and preferences of secondary school students, Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 984-1001.
  9. Blachowicz, C.; Bates, A.; Berne, J.; Bridgman, T.; Chaney, J. & Perney, J. (2009). Technology and at-risk young readers and their classrooms, Reading Psychology 30, 387–411.
  10. Bippert, K. & Harmon, J. (2017). Middle school teachers’ perceptıons of computer-assisted reading intervention programs, Reading Psychology 38, 203–230.
  11. Boerma, I.; Mol, S. & Jolles, J. (2015). Teacher perceptions affect boys’ and girls’ reading motivation differently, Reading Psychology 37, 547–569.
  12. Bussert-Webb, K.& Zhang, Z. (2016). Reading attitudes of texas high school students, Reading Psychology 37, 424–448.
  13. Burns, A. & Siegel, J. (2018). International perspectives on teaching the four skills in ELT. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Büyüköztürk, Ş.; Çakmak Kılıç, E.; Akgün, Ö.A.; Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (11. Baskı). Ankara:
  14. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  15. Chotitham, S.& Wongwanich, S. (2014). The reading attitude measurement for enhancing elementary school students’ achievement, 5th world conference on educational sciences (WCES 2013