Journals / Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2011 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Digital Techniques in Cultural Heritage Documentation

KÜLTÜREL MİRASIN BELGELENMESİNDE DİJİTAL YAKLAŞIMLAR

Pages
67–83
Publication Date
2011-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the result of the study, importance of methods used in cultural heritage documentation was emphasized and their effect to documentation process was discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efforts made for obtaining the most straight and healthy data in cultural heritage documentation has caused to emerge new techniques in documentation field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With rapid developing technology, modern documentation techniques take the place of conventional documentation techniques and this has provided the improvement of contemporary documentation techniques rapidly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the result of the study, importance of methods used in cultural heritage documentation was emphasized and their effect to documentation process was discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Modern Belgeleme Yöntemleri · Kültürel Mirasın Belgelenmesi · Rölöve.

Abstract

Efforts made for obtaining the most straight and healthy data in cultural heritage documentation has caused to emerge new techniques in documentation field. With rapid developing technology, modern documentation techniques take the place of conventional documentation techniques and this has provided the improvement of contemporary documentation techniques rapidly. Today’s technology gives possibility to documentation and transmitting of cultural heritage to new generations more sensitive and more rapidly. In the content of this study, Konya Karatay and Sırçalı Medresah Photogrammetric projects were given and comparisons were made between methods. At the result of the study, importance of methods used in cultural heritage documentation was emphasized and their effect to documentation process was discussed.

Özet

Kültürel mirasımızın belgelenmesinde doğru ve sağlıklı veriyi elde edebilmek için yapılan çabalar, belgeleme alanında yeni tekniklerin ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuş, gelişen teknoloji ile birlikte klasik yöntemle belgeleme yerini artık modern belgeleme tekniklerine bırakmış, bu da çağdaş belgeleme tekniklerinin hızlı bir şekilde ilerlemesini sağlamıştır. Bugünkü teknoloji tarihi eserlerin ve korunacak yapıların artık daha hassas ve daha hızlı bir şekilde belgelenmesine ve gelecek nesillere aktarılmasına olanak vermektedir. Çalışmada, mimarlıkta belgeleme ve önemine değinilmiş, belgeleme bileşenlerinden bahsedilmiş ve kültürel mirasın belgelenmesinde kullanılan modern yöntemler kısaca anlatılıştır. Çalışma kapsamında Konya Karatay ve Sırçalı Medrese’nin fotogrametrik rölövelerine yer verilmiş ayrıca farklı yöntemler arasında karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda yöntemlerin kültürel mirasın belgelenmesindeki yerine ve önemine değinilmiş, yöntemlerin, belgeleme sürecindeki etkileri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORUMAZ, A. G., DÜLGERLER, O. N., YAKAR, M. (2011). Digital Techniques in Cultural Heritage Documentation. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 67–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/909557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alby, E., Grussenmeyer, P., Perin, J.P., “Analogy Between Architecture and Documentation”, CIPA 2005
  2. XX International Symposium, Torino, Italy, 26 Sept – 01 Oct, 2005.
  3. Almagro A., Vidal, A., “Traditional Drawings versus New Representation Techniques”, XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece, 01‐06 October 2007.
  4. Atkinson, K.B., 1996 Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision, Whittles Publishing Service, London. Blake, W.H., “What is the Future of Metric Heritage Documentation and Its Skills?”, Internatioanl Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII,Part 5 Commission V Symposium, New Castle Upon Tyne, UK, 2010.
  5. Bonora, V., Tucci, G., Vaccaro, V., “3D Data Fusion adn Multi‐Resolution Approach For a New Survey Aimed to a Complete Model of Rucellai’s Chapel By Leon Battista Albetri in Florence”, CIPA 2005 XX International Symposium,Torino, Italy, 26 September‐1 October, 2005.
  6. Boehler, W., Heinz, G., “Documentation, Surveying, Photogrammetry”, CIPA Working Group XVII CIPA Symposium, Recife, Olinda, Brazil, 1999.
  7. Boehler, W.,Marbs, A., “3D Scanning Instruments”, In proceedings of International Workshop in Scanning for Cultural Heritage Recording,‐Complementing or Replacing Photogrammetry, Corfu, Greece, September, 1‐2, 2002.
  8. Boehler, W., 2005, “Comparison of 3D scanning and other 3D measurement techniques”, Proc. International Workshop on Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage, (Centro Stefano Franscini, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland, 22‐27 May 2005.
  9. Chevrier C., Perrin J.P., “ Laser Range Data, Photographs and Architectural Components”, Commission V,WG V/2 The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVII. Part B5. Beijing 2008. DʹAyala, D. and Smars, P., 2003, Minimum Requirement for Metric Use of Non‐Metric Photographic Documentation, University of Bath Report. http://www.englishheritage.org.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.4274 English Heritage, 2003, Metric Survey for Heritage Documentation, Documentation for Conservation:A Manual for Teaching Metric Survey Skills. English Heritage, 2005, http://www.english ‐ heritage.org.uk Erdemir Y., 2001, Karatay Medresesi Çini Eserler Müzesi, T.C. Konya Valiliği, İl Kültür Müdürlüğü, Konya. Erdemir Y., 2001, Sırçalı Medrese Mezar Anıtları Müzesi, T.C. Konya Valiliği, İl Kültür Müdürlüğü, Konya. Kuban, D., 2000, Tarihi çevre Koruma ve Onarımın Mimarlık Boyutu Kuram ve Uygulama, Yapı