SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Ultimate Pit Limit Determination Methods

AÇIK OCAK NİHAİ SINIRLARININ BELİRLENMESİNDE KULLANILAN YÖNTEMLER

Murat ÖZKAN
Selamet G. ERÇELEBİ
Pages
38–53
Publication Date
2014-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, advantages and disadvantages of the methods are outlined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the importance of determining the ultimate pit limits and block model concept used for this purpose, were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A two-dimensional block model example is optimized by using above 4 methods, and the results obtained are compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, advantages and disadvantages of the methods are outlined.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Açık Ocak Nihai Sınırları · Lerchs-Grossmann Algoritması · Grafik Teorisi

Abstract

In this study, the importance of determining the ultimate pit limits and block model concept used for this purpose, were examined. Then Dynamic Programming, Graph Theory, Maximum Flow Algorithm and Moving Cone Algorithm which are commonly used to find the pit limits were examined in detail. A two-dimensional block model example is optimized by using above 4 methods, and the results obtained are compared. According to the results obtained, advantages and disadvantages of the methods are outlined.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, madencilikte açık ocak nihai sınırlarının belirlenmesinin önemi ve bu amaçla kullanılan blok model kavramı incelenmiştir. Daha sonra açık ocak nihai sınırlarını bulmak için sık kullanılan yöntemlerden Dinamik Programlama, Grafik Teorisi, Hareketli Koni Algoritması ve Maksimum Akış Algoritması detaylı olarak incelenmiştir. Bu dört yöntem kullanılarak iki boyutlu bir blok model örneği üzerinde uygulama yapılmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre yöntemlerin avantaj ve dezavantajları belirtilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, M., ERÇELEBİ, S. G. (2014). Ultimate Pit Limit Determination Methods. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 38–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/909466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ataee-Pour, M., 2000. A heuristic algorithm to optimise stope boundaries, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Wollongong, 319 p. Barnes, R.J., 1982.
  2. Optimizing the ultimate pit, MS Thesis T-2611, Colorado School of Mines. Cai, W.L., 1992. Sensitivity analysis of 3-D model block dimensions in the economic open pit limit design, 23rd APCOM, SME, Colorado, pp. 475-486.
  3. Carlson, T.R., Erickson, J.D., O’Brain, D.T. and Pana, M.T., 1966.
  4. Computer techniques in mine planning, Mining Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 53-56.
  5. Clark, I., 1979. Does Geostatistics Work?, 16th APCOM, AIME, New York, pp. 213-225.
  6. Chen, T., 1976. 3D pit design with variable wall slope capabilities. Proceedings 14th APCOM Symposium of the Society of Mining Engineers, AIME, New York, pp. 615–625.
  7. Crawford, J.T., 1979. Open Pit Limit Analysis – Some Observations on Its Use, 16th APCOM, Crawford and Hustrulid eds., AIME, New York, pp. 625-634.
  8. Crawford, J.T. and Davey, R.K., 1979. Case Study in Open-Pit Limit Analysis, Computer Methods for the 80’s in the Mineral Industry, Weiss, A. ed., AIME, New York, pp.310-317.
  9. Davey, R.K., 1979.
  10. Mineral Block Evaluation Criteria, Open Pit Mine Planning and Design, ed. J.T. Crawford and W.A. Hustrulid, SME-AIME, New York, pp 83-97.
  11. Davey, R.K. and Switzer, J.E., 1979. Computer-Assisted Mineralization Modeling at Kennecott Copper Corporation, Computer Methods for the 80’s in the Mineral Industry, Weiss, A. ed., AIME, New York, pp. 260-267.
  12. Dunlop, J.S., 1979. Geostatistical Modelling of an Australian Iron Ore Body, 16th APCOM, AIME, NewYork, pp. 226-239.
  13. Elevli, B., 1992. Open pit mine production scheduling using operations research and artificial intelligence, PhD Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, 189 p. Erarslan, K., 1996. Development of A Model for Open Pit Limits Optimization Integrated with A Sequencing System, PhD Thesis, ODTÜ, 163 p. Ford, C.R. and Fulkerson, D.R., 1956.
  14. Maximal flow through a network, Canadian J. Math., Vol. 8, pp. 399-404.
  15. Hustrulid, W. and Kuchta, M., 2006. Open pit mine planning and design, 2nd edition, Taylor and Francis, London, 735 p. Huttagosol, P., 1988. Modified Tree Graph Algorithm for Ultimate Pit Limit Analysis. MS Thesis T-3412. Colorado School of Mines, 396 p. Johnson, T.B., 1968. Optimum Open Pit Mine production scheduling, Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 120 p. Johnson, T.B. and Sharp, W.R., 1971. A three-dimensional dynamic programming method for optimal