SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

An Overview of Software Defined Campus Networks

Yazılım Tanımlı Yerleşke Ağlarının Geliştirilmesi için Bir Derleme

Mahir KUTAY
Tuncay ERCAN
Pages
155–164
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The number of users and overall workload on computer networks increase continually.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The number of users and overall workload on computer networks increase continually.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the management of the computer networks infrastructure in which taking the advantage of rapid changes in technology is still complicated and exteremely expensive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This will help computer networks being more flexible and contribute the management of Information Technologies with a higher functionality and lower cost.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:SDN · Açık Akış · Yazılım Tanımlı Ağ

Abstract

The number of users and overall workload on computer networks increase continually. However, the management of the computer networks infrastructure in which taking the advantage of rapid changes in technology is still complicated and exteremely expensive. The concept of Software Defined Networks (SDN) proposes the development of software tools with new applications to decouple the network devices from the network traffic as similar as virtualization technologies. This will help computer networks being more flexible and contribute the management of Information Technologies with a higher functionality and lower cost.

Özet

Bilgisayar ağlarındaki kullanıcı sayıları ve yükleri sürekli olarak artmakla birlikte, ağ yönetim metodolojileri iletişim teknolojisindeki hızlı gelişmeye ayak uyduramadığı için karmaşık ve yüksek maliyetli bir işletme fonksiyonu olarak geride kalmıştır. Yazılım Tanımlı Ağ kavramı bilgisayarlarda uygulanan sanallaştırma ile benzer yöntemleri kullanarak ağ trafiğini düzenleyen cihazların yönetiminin ayrı bir yönetim katmanından yapılmasını sağlayacak uygulamaların geliştirilmesini önermektedir. Sanallaştırma ve ayrı bir katmandan yönetim, bilgisayar ağlarının daha esnek kullanılmasına olanak sağlayacak, Bilgi Teknolojileri yönetiminin düşük maliyetli ve kolaylıkla gerçekleştirilmesine katkıda bulunacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTAY, M., ERCAN, T. (2016). An Overview of Software Defined Campus Networks. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 155–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/909416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Astuto B., Nunes A., Mendonca M., Nguyen X.N., Obraczka K., Turletti T., 2014, “A Survey of Software Defined Networks: Past, Present and Future of Programmable Networks”. IEEE Comm. Survey and Tutorials, 16(3). Campbell T., Katzela I., Miki K., Vincente J., 1999, “Open Signaling for ATM, Internet and Mobile Networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(1), 97-108.
  2. Casado M., Freedman M.J., Pettit J., Luo J., McKeown N., Shenker S., 2006, “Sane: A Protection Architecture for Enterprise Networks”, 15th Conf. on USENIX Security Symposium, Conference Proceeding (Article no. 10). Casado M., Garfinkel T., Akella A., Freedman M.J., Boneh D., McKeown N., Shenker S., 2007, “Ethane: Taking Control of the Enterprise”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(4), 1-12. Cisco Networks, (23.10.2015), “Cisco APIC”, http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/cloud-systemsmanagement/application-policy-infrastructure-controller-apic/products-technical-referencelist. html. Denton J., 2014, “Learning OpenStack Networking (Neutron)”, Packt Publishing Ltd. Doria A., Helstrand F., Sundell K., Worster T., 2002, “General Switch Management Protocol GMSPV3”, Internet Requests for Commence (RFC), 2070-3292, ISSN(print), 2070-1721.
  3. Feng X., Shen J., Fan Y., 2009, “REST: An Alternative to RPC for Web Services Architecture”, IEEE In Future Information Networks, Conference Proceeding (ICFIN), 7-10. Fernandez M.P., 2014, “Evaluating Openflow Controller Paradigms”, ICN2013 Conference Proceeding, 151-157.
  4. Greenberg A., Hjalmytsson G., Maltz D.A., Myers A., Rexford J., Xie G., Yan H., Zhan J., Zhang H., 2005, “A Clean Slate 4D Approach to Network Control and Management”. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Review, 35(5), 41-54.
  5. Hayward S.S., O’Callaghan E., Sezer S., 2013, “SDN Security: A Survey”, IEEE SDN4FNS Conference Proceeding, 56-62. HP Company, (23.10.2015), “Search HP.com”, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/networking/sdn/devcenterindex. html. Jiang L., Yang X., Li T., 2014, “The Analysis and Design for a Network Analysis System Based on WinPcap”. Communications Security Conference Conference Proceeding, Article No. 731. Juniper Networks, (23.10.2015), “Contrail Open SDN”, http://www.juniper.net/us/en/productsservices/ sdn/ contrail/. Kim H., Benson T., Akella A., 2011, “The Evolution of Network Configuration: A Tale of Two Campuses”, ACM Internet Measuring Conference, SIGCOMM, Conference Proceeding. Kim H., Feamster N., 2013, “Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking”,