SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Tourism Leisure and Hospitality / 2021 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Reviewing the Production and Development of ‘Place’ Knowledge in a Recreational Context

Deniz KARAGÖZ
Selin KAMA
Pages
47–60
Publication Date
2021-06-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Place attachment, sense of place and place meaning have been determined as the dominant and main subject areas in the field of recreation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to review the production, development and trends of place knowledge in the field of recreation from a bibliometric perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Relational bibliometric techniques were used to analyze 148 articles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Place attachment, sense of place and place meaning have been determined as the dominant and main subject areas in the field of recreation.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Recreation · Place · Space

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review the production, development and trends of place knowledge in the field of recreation from a bibliometric perspective. Data was obtained through a search of the terms ‘recreation’, ‘place’, and ‘space’ on the Web of Science database and by filtering research articles. Relational bibliometric techniques were used to analyze 148 articles. The development of spatial knowledge in the field of recreation was determined through centrality analysis and network mapping techniques. In addition, during the research, the most important articles, researchers, institutions and collaborations in the field were defined. According to the research findings, 302 researchers conducted research on recreation and place, either in co-operation with each other or individually, in 43 journals. Place attachment, sense of place and place meaning have been determined as the dominant and main subject areas in the field of recreation.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖZ, D., KAMA, S. (2021). Reviewing the Production and Development of ‘Place’ Knowledge in a Recreational Context. Journal of Tourism Leisure and Hospitality, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 47–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/908263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abildtrup, J., Garcia, S., Olsen, S. B., & Stenger, A. (2013). Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics, 92, 67-77.
  2. Anderson, D. H. & Fulton, D. C. (2008). Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: Place attachment relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13(2), 73-88.
  3. Beeco, J. A., Hallo, J. C., & Brownlee, M. T. (2014). GPS visitor tracking and recreation suitability mapping: Tools for understanding and managing visitor use. Landscape and Urban Planning, 127, 136-145.
  4. Beeco, J. A. & Brown, G. (2013). Integrating space, spatial tools, and spatial analysis into the human dimensions of parks and outdoor recreation. Applied Geography, 38, 76-85.
  5. Beery, T. & Jönsson, K. I. (2017). Outdoor recreation and place attachment: Exploring the potential of outdoor recreation within a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17, 54-63.
  6. Berlyne, D. E. (1973). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (4), 553-553
  7. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 57-71.
  8. Bricker, K. S. & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure sciences, 22(4), 233-257.
  9. Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J. & Berbel, J. (2010). Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment. Land Economics, 86(3), 552-568.
  10. Brown, P. J., Dyer, A. & Whaley, R. S. (1973). Recreation research—so what?. Journal of Leisure Research, 5(1), 16-24.
  11. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure Research, 9(3), 174-187.
  12. Carls, E. G. (1974). The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research, 6, 113-124.
  13. Cheng, C. K. & Kuo, H. Y. (2015). Bonding to a new place never visited: Exploring the relationship between landscape elements and place bonding. Tourism Management, 46, 546-560.
  14. Chenoweth, R. E. & Gobster, P. H. (1990). The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape. Landscape Journal, 9(1), 1-8.
  15. Cheung, D. M. W. & Tang, B. S. (2016). Recreation space or urban land reserve? Land-use zoning patterns and the transformation of open space in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(3). Chung, J. Y., Kyle, G. T., Petrick, J. F., & Ab