SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Business / 2021 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

GLOBAL ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY & CRYPTOCURRENCIES: BOOTSTRAP PANEL CAUSALITY ANALYSIS

KÜRESEL EKONOMİK POLİTİKA BELİRSİZLİĞİ VE KRİPTO PARALAR: BOOTSTRAP PANEL NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Ersin KANAT
Pages
319–331
Publication Date
2021-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings from the study show that economic policy uncertainty can have an impact on the value of cryptocurrencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on cryptocurrencies is investigated by panel data methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cross section dependency and homogeneity tests were carried out in this study in which data for the period 2018: 01-2020: 12 were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings from the study show that economic policy uncertainty can have an impact on the value of cryptocurrencies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kripto Para · Ekonomik Politika Belirsizliği · Bootstrap Panel Nedensellik Testi

Abstract

In this study, the effect of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on cryptocurrencies is investigated by panel data methods. For this purpose, firstly, monthly data of the four largest cryptocurrencies and the global economic policy uncertainty (EPU) index were obtained. The cryptocurrencies used in the study are Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), BinanceCoin (BNB) and Ripple (XRP). Cross section dependency and homogeneity tests were carried out in this study in which data for the period 2018: 01-2020: 12 were used. Later, bootstrap panel causality test which proposed by Kónya (2006) was applied. EPU and Bitcoin, which ranked first out of four cryptocurrencies, had a two-way causality relationship, while no causality relationship was found for the last-place XRP. In the second and third ranked crypto currencies, it has been observed that there is a one-way causality relationship from EPU to these coins. Findings from the study show that economic policy uncertainty can have an impact on the value of cryptocurrencies.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ekonomik politika belirsizliğinin (EPU) kripto paralar üzerindeki etkisi panel veri yöntemleriyle araştırılmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öncelikle küresel ekonomik politika belirsizliği endeksi ve en büyük dört kripto paranın aylık verileri elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan kripto paralar; Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), BinanceCoin (BNB) ve Ripple (XRP)’dir. 2018:01-2020:12 dönemine ait verilerin kullanıldığı çalışmada, yatay kesit bağımlılığı ve homojenlik testleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha sonra Kónya (2006) tarafından önerilen bootstrap panel nedensellik testi uygulanmıştır. Dört kripto paradan ilk sırada yer alan Bitcoin ile EPU arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunurken, son sırada bulunan XRP için herhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisine rastlanamamıştır. İkinci ve üçüncü sıradaki kripto paralarda ise EPU’dan bu paralara doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, ekonomik politika belirsizliğinin kripto paraların değerleri üzerinde etkisi olabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANAT, E. (2021). GLOBAL ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY & CRYPTOCURRENCIES: BOOTSTRAP PANEL CAUSALITY ANALYSIS. Journal of Research in Business, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 319–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/908099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S.,. Thwaites, G. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274.
  2. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. he Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024.
  3. Blockchain. (2021). Trade Volume: https://www.blockchain.com/charts/trade-volume (Erişim Tarihi: 26/03/2021)
  4. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253, Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111.
  5. Demir, E., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K., & A.Vigne, S. (2018). Does economic policy uncertainty predict the Bitcoin returns? An empirical investigation. Finance Research Letters, 26, 145-149, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.01.005.
  6. Economic Policy Uncertainty. (2021). https://www.policyuncertainty.com/index.html (Erişim Tarihi: 26/03/2021).
  7. Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2015).
  8. Oil Shocks, Policy Uncertainty and Stock Returns in China. Economics of Transition, 23(4), 657-676, Doi: 10.1111/ecot.12062. Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008.
  9. Kyrıazis, N. A. (2020).
  10. The Effects of Gold, Stock Markets and Geopolitical Uncertainty on Bitcoin Prices and Volatility. Global Economy Journal, 20(4), 1-15, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2194565920500207.
  11. Li, X., & Wang, C. A. (2017). The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin. Decision Support Systems, 95, 49-60, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.12.001.
  12. Okorie, D. I., & Lin, B. (2020). Crude oil price and cryptocurrencies: Evidence of volatility connectedness and hedging strategy. Energy Economics, 87, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104703.
  13. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. Cambridge University, Working Paper. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x.
  14. Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Eco