Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

The late-term results in our patients operated for lumbar spine fractures

Pages
519–525
Publication Date
2023-03-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that 60% of the patients were rated as Denis P1, 35% as P2, and 5% as P3.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The current study aimed to evaluate the late-term results of patients operated for lumbar spine fractures in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 134 patients from January 2012 to January 2020 were treated with “short-segment pedicle instrumentation” for lumbar fractures in our neurosurgery department.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that 60% of the patients were rated as Denis P1, 35% as P2, and 5% as P3.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Lumbar · Spinal fractures · Spinal surgery

Abstract

Aim: The current study aimed to evaluate the late-term results of patients operated for lumbar spine fractures in our clinic. Material and Method: 134 patients from January 2012 to January 2020 were treated with “short-segment pedicle instrumentation” for lumbar fractures in our neurosurgery department. Patients with a burst fracture of a single lumbar vertebra were included. The final sample consisted of 67 patients who were followed up over the years with radiographs before and after surgery and CT scans at the final follow-up. Results: The results showed that 60% of the patients were rated as Denis P1, 35% as P2, and 5% as P3. Screw breakage was observed in seven patients, and 67 patients underwent revision surgery. Furthermore, the fractured vertebral body’s height was improved at the final follow-up stage, and an increase was witnessed from the preoperative figure of 16.4 mm to 25.8 at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, the average Cobb angle was -11.6° preoperatively, and 6.3° after the operation and the correction loss was 12.1° which was severe in the middle part of the vertebra. By the final follow-up, disc spaces were narrowed below and above the fractured vertebra, and no correlation was found between clinical outcomes and adjacent disc degeneration. Conclusion: We concluded that short-segment pedicle instrumentation produced satisfactory long-term results for lumbar fractures. To achieve adequate outcomes, correct management of complications and evaluation of various factors must be focused on.

🔖

Cite This Article

İZCİ, E., PEKİNCE, O., KESKİN, F. (2023). The late-term results in our patients operated for lumbar spine fractures. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 519–525. https://ajindex.com/articles/907876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kumar R, Lim J, Mekary RA, et al. Traumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: 345-63. WorldOMeters. Turkey Population 2020. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/turkey-population/
  2. Taşoğlu Ö, Koyuncu E, Daylak R, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of persons with spinal cord injury in Turkey: One-year experience of a primary referral rehabilitation center. J Spinal Cord Med 2018; 41: 157-64.
  3. Venkatesh K, Ghosh SK, Mullick M, Manivasagam G, Sen D. Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, treatment strategies, associated challenges, and future implications. Cell Tissue Res 2019; 377: 125-51.
  4. Wang H, Lv B, Zhang Z, Wang S, Ding W. Prevalence and predictors for preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with thoracolumbar fractures caused by high-energy injuries. World Neurosurg 2020; 141: 431-6.
  5. Niemi-Nikkola V, Saijets N, Ylipoussu H, et al. Long-term posttraumatic survival of spinal fracture patients in northern Finland. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43: 1657-63. Alswat KA. Gender disparities in osteoporosis. J Clin Med Res 2017; 9: 382-7.
  6. Wakim J, Rajan T, Beschloss A, Albayar A, Ozturk A, Saifi C. Etiologies, incidence, and demographics of lumbar vertebral fractures in U.S. emergency departments. J Spine Surg 2022; 8: 21-8.
  7. Baidwan NK, Naranje SM. Epidemiology and recent trends of geriatric fractures presenting to the emergency department for United States population from year 2004-2014. Public Health 2017; 142: 64-9.
  8. Burke D, Lennon O, Fullen BM. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: the impact of pain. Eur J Pain 2018; 22: 1662-72.
  9. Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, Ploumis A. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures [published correction appears in Spine J 2014 Aug 1; 14(8): A18. Lebl, Darren S [corrected to Lebl, Darren R]]. Spine J 2014; 14: 145-64.
  10. Malçok Ü. A., Akar A. Distribution of traumatic spinal injuries in Turkey in accordance with ICD-10 codes between the years 2015 and 2019. Eskisehir Med J 2021; 2: 68-73.
  11. Pannu CD, Farooque K, Sharma V, Singal D. Minimally invasive spine surgeries for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures of spine: A systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10: 147-55.
  12. McAnany SJ, Overley SC, Kim JS, Baird EO, Qureshi SA, Anderson PA. Open versus minimally invasive fixation techniques for thoracolumbar trauma: a meta-analysis. Global Spine J 2016; 6: 186-94.
  13. Seo JY, Kwon YS, Kim KJ, Shin JY, Kim YH, Ha KY. Clinical importance of poster