Journals / Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4

The Determination of Proximate Composition and Some Biologic Characteristics of Flatfish (Pegusa lascaris) captured in the Black Sea Coasts

Karadeniz Kıyılarında Avlanan Dil Balığı (Pegusa lascaris)’nın Besin Bileşiminin ve Bazı Biyolojik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
717–724
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Raw protein, raw lipid, raw ash, moisture, carbohydrate and energy values of fish were determined 16.901±0.038 %, 0.979±0.055 %, 1.287±0.027 %, 79.637±0.192 %, 1.196±0.078 % and 108.845±0.3233 kcal/100g respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, some biological characteristics and proximate composition of flatfish (Pegusa lascaaris), which is caught as a non-target species on the Black Sea coast, have been determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted between 01 October 2019 and 30 September 2020 on the coasts of Sinop province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Raw protein, raw lipid, raw ash, moisture, carbohydrate and energy values of fish were determined 16.901±0.038 %, 0.979±0.055 %, 1.287±0.027 %, 79.637±0.192 %, 1.196±0.078 % and 108.845±0.3233 kcal/100g respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dil balığı · Pegusa lascaris · besin bileşimi

Abstract

In this study, some biological characteristics and proximate composition of flatfish (Pegusa lascaaris), which is caught as a non-target species on the Black Sea coast, have been determined. The study was conducted between 01 October 2019 and 30 September 2020 on the coasts of Sinop province. Flatfish were obtained from fishing vessels engaged in fishing with set nets and dredge (algarna). Average length and average weight of caught flatfish was determined as 15.07±0.006 cm and 31.47±0.521 g respectively. The length-weight relationship of the flatfish was calculated as W=0.0056L3.1611, while the growth of the species was found to be positive allometric. Raw protein, raw lipid, raw ash, moisture, carbohydrate and energy values of fish were determined 16.901±0.038 %, 0.979±0.055 %, 1.287±0.027 %, 79.637±0.192 %, 1.196±0.078 % and 108.845±0.3233 kcal/100g respectively.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Karadeniz kıyılarında hedef dışı tür olarak avlanan dil balığı (Pegusa lascaaris)’nın besin kompozisyonu ve bazı biyolojik özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Araştırma 01 Ekim 2019 ve 30 Eylül 2020 tarihleri arasında Sinop ili kıyılarında yürütülmüştür. Dil balıkları bölgede uzatma ağları ve algarna ile avcılık yapan balıkçı gemilerinden elde edilmiştir. Yakalanan dil balıklarının ortalama boyları 15.07±0.006 cm ve ortalama ağırlıklıları 31.47±0.521 g olarak tespit edilmiştir. Dil balığının boy ağırlık ilişkisi W=0.0056L3.1611 olarak hesaplanırken, türün büyümesinin pozitif (+) allometrik olduğu saptanmıştır. Balığın % ham protein, ham yağ, ham kül, nem, karbonhidrat ve enerji (kcal/100g) değerleri sırasıyla 16.901±0.038, 0.979±0.055, 1.287±0.027, 79.637±0.192, 1.196±4.628 ve 108.845±0.3233 olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYAR, H. A., ÖZDEMİR, S., BAYRAKLI, B. (2020). The Determination of Proximate Composition and Some Biologic Characteristics of Flatfish (Pegusa lascaris) captured in the Black Sea Coasts. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4, 717–724. https://ajindex.com/articles/907701

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adamidou A., Pardalou, A., Tsikliras, A.C. (2020). Length-Weight Relationships of 31 Fish and Invertebrate Species in the Northern Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean Sea). International Journal of Marine Sciences, 36: 303–307 AOAC, (1990).
  2. Official methods of analysis, In: (K. Helrich, ed.), 15th Edition,
  3. Arlington, VA, USA. AOAC, (1998). Official Methods of Analysis, 16 th Ed., Chapter 39. (D.L., Soderberg Chapter editor) In: “Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International” (P. Cunniff Ed.). Bligh, E.G., Dyer, W.J., (1959). A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Phy. 37: 911-917.
  4. Balık, İ. (2020a). Effects of depth and season on catch volume of bottom gillnets employed along the Fatsa coasts of the South-eastern Black Sea. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(2): 187-194.
  5. Balık, İ. (2020b). Effect of depth and season on catch composition and discard rate in gillnet fishery in the south-eastern coast of the Black Sea. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(1): 82-93.
  6. Bat L., Şahin, F., Satılmış, H.H., Üstün, F., Birinci Özdemir, Z., Kıdeys, A.E., Shulman, G.E. (2007). The changed ecosystem of the Black Sea and its impact on anchovy fisheries. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 1(4): 191-227.
  7. Bayraklı. B., Duyar, H.A. (2019a). The Effect of Raw Material Freshness on Fish Oil Quality Produced in Fish Meal and Oil Plant. Journal of Anatolian Environmental And Animal Sciences. 4.3, P.473-479.
  8. Bayraklı. B., Duyar, H.A. (2019b). Karadeniz’de Hamsi Ununa Alternatif Olarak Üretilen Çaça Ununun Besin Bileşenlerinin Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences. 4(3): 45-550
  9. Bayraklı, B., Özdemir, S., Duyar, H.A. (2019). Karadeniz’de Hamsi (Engraulis encrasicolus) ve Çaça (Sprattus sprattus) Balıklarının Avcılığı ile Balık Unu-yağı İşleme Teknolojisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Menba Su Ürünleri Dergisi 2(2): 1-10.
  10. Bling, E.G., Dyer, W.J. (1959). A rapid methods of total lipid exraction and purification, Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37: 911-917.
  11. Büyükdeveci, F. (2019). Karadeniz'de kullanılan farklı ağ göz açıklığına sahip fanyalı uzatma ağlarının seçiciliklerinin farklı modellerle belirlenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Sinop Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 123 s. Sinop Cerim, H., Ateş, C. (2016). Selectivity of trammel nets (80 ve 90 mm mesh size) for common sole (Solea solea linnaeus, 1758) used in Güllük Bay. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 33(4): 3