Journals / International Journal of Health Management and Tourism / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch

Pages
17–57
Publication Date
2023-03-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Brand cynicism items created in the form of netnography were handled as brand distance and an item pool was created.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The present article examines the brand-contextual effects of the recent pandemic in the form of cynical brand distance conceptualization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The research was carried out in the form of a web survey on social media on 298 consumers and analysis was done with PLS algoritm with SmartPLS software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Brand cynicism items created in the form of netnography were handled as brand distance and an item pool was created.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:social distance · segment shift · pandemic

Abstract

Aim: The present article examines the brand-contextual effects of the recent pandemic in the form of cynical brand distance conceptualization. The study aims to determine whether the consumers' perception of social distance and brand congruency perceptions affects the cynical brand distance and then brand shift perception. Methods: The research was carried out in the form of a web survey on social media on 298 consumers and analysis was done with PLS algoritm with SmartPLS software. Results: It is found that a positive relationship between brand congruency and cynical brand distance. A positive association between social distance and cynical brand distance is determined. It was also positive effect of cynical brand distance on brand switch. Conclusion: They are considering that the impact of the social distance comes from pandemic on the consumer's preferences, especially on their attitudes towards brands, it has been considered that the consumer may create a subjective or general negative attitude or distance to the brand or brands. Especially because it triggers brand cynicism, the validity of the brand distance scale based on brand cynicism, again, its relationship with social distance, and brand switch concepts were examined. Brand cynicism items created in the form of netnography were handled as brand distance and an item pool was created.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, M. H., ALTINTAŞ, F. Ç., IŞIN, F. B. (2023). Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 17–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/906794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, D. C., and Salois, M. J. (2010). Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25(4), 331-341.
  2. Adams, J. E., Highhouse, S., and Zickar, M. J. (2010). Understanding general distrust of corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 38-51.
  3. Adler, P. S., and Borys, B. (1993). Materialism and idealism in organizational research. Organization Studies, 14(5), 657-679.
  4. Akhondzadeh-Noughabi, E., & Albadvi, A. (2015). Mining the dominant patterns of customer shifts between segments by using top-k and distinguishing sequential rules. Management decision. Amine, A., and Gicquel, Y. (2011). Rethinking resistance and anti-consumption behaviours in the light of the concept of deviance. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1809-1819.
  5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Austin, C. G., Plouffe, C. R., and Peters, C. (2005). Anti-commercial consumer rebellion: Conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 14(1), 62-78.
  6. Auty, S. (1992). Consumer choice and segmentation in the restaurant industry. Service Industries Journal, 12(3), 324-339.
  7. Balaji, M. S., Jha, S., Sengupta, A. S., & Krishnan, B. C. (2018). Are cynical customers satisfied differently? Role of negative inferred motive and customer participation in service recovery. Journal of Business Research, 86, 109-118.
  8. Balasubramanian, S., Gupta, S., Kamakura, W., & Wedel, M. (1998). Modeling large data sets in marketing. Statistica Neerlandica, 52(3), 303-323.
  9. Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004). A three-component model of customer to service providers. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 32(3), 234-250.
  10. Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
  11. Benedikter, R. (2002). 15 Zukunftsentwürfe der Geisteswissenschaften am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Neohelicon, 29(2), 261-276.
  12. Berger, P. D., Bolton, R. N., Bowman, D., Briggs, E., Kumar, V., Parasuraman, A., & Terry, C. (2002). Marketing actions and the va