Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Sparking Leadership Scale (SLS) Development and Validation

Ateşleyici Liderlik Ölçeği (ALÖ) Geliştirme Çalışması

Pages
18–34
Publication Date
2020-05-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed model on sparking leaders, unengaged employees and passionate organizations relationship provides a conceptual framework in an area where little prior research that relies on anecdotal evidence has been done.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today the challenge facing the leaders is not how to engage employees; it is how to keep the fires of passion burning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nevertheless, most studies neither link the two constructs nor explain how the leaders may make an influence on the disengaged employees to turn them into a passionate workforce.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed model on sparking leaders, unengaged employees and passionate organizations relationship provides a conceptual framework in an area where little prior research that relies on anecdotal evidence has been done.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sparking leadership · engagement at work · disengaged employees

Abstract

Today the challenge facing the leaders is not how to engage employees; it is how to keep the fires of passion burning. Nevertheless, most studies neither link the two constructs nor explain how the leaders may make an influence on the disengaged employees to turn them into a passionate workforce. The aim of this paper is to shed light on how sparking leaders ignite passion into the disengaged employees and translate them into a passionate workforce. This paper introduces a theoretical framework for sparking leadership and develops “Sparking Leadership Scale (SLS)” to measure it. The proposed model on sparking leaders, unengaged employees and passionate organizations relationship provides a conceptual framework in an area where little prior research that relies on anecdotal evidence has been done.

Özet

Liderlik, yıllardır farklı açılardan incelenmektedir. Son yıllarda yapılan tüm çalışmalar, liderin vizyonu belirlemenin yanı sıra, çalışanlara ilham ve enerji de verebilmesi gerektiği konusunda birleşmektedirler. Araştırmalar, günümüzde çalışanların büyük bir kısmının işlerine angaje olmadıklarını (unengaged) ortaya koymaktadır. Hızla değişen iş dünyasında başarılı olabilmek için, örgütlerin, çalışanlarının işe angaje olmalarından (employee engagement) çok daha fazlasına ihtiyaçları vardır. Artık örgütlerde asıl önemli olan tutkulu çalışanlara sahip olmaktır. Bu noktada liderlerin karşılaştığı zorluk, çalışanların ne şekilde işe angaje edilecekleri değil; tutkularının nasıl ateşleneceğidir. İşe angaje olmayan çalışanların tutkusunu ateşlemenin anahtarı ateşleyici liderlik olduğu için, bu konunun detaylı bir şekilde araştırılması önem taşımaktadır. Bu araştırma, ateşleyici liderlik üzerine teorik bir çerçeve sunuyor olması yanı sıra, Ateşleyici Liderlik Ölçeği (ALÖ)’ni geliştirme çalışmasını da içermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİNOĞLU, E., YOZGAT, U. (2020). Sparking Leadership Scale (SLS) Development and Validation. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 18–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/90471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Armstrong, J. S. ve Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396–402.
  2. Aselstine, K. ve Alletson, K. (2006). A New Employment Deal for the 21st Century Workplace. Retrieved at https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/a-new-employment-deal-for-the-21st-century-workplace/ Erişim tarihi 30.09.2019
  3. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full Range Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City: Mind Garden. Bennis, W. (1998). Becoming a leader of leaders. G. Rowan (Der./Ed.) Rethinking the Future: Rethinking Business, Principles, Competition, Control & Complexity, Leadership, Markets, and the World: 148-163.
  4. London, Nicholas Brealey. Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 62(1): 2–5.
  5. Bennis, W. ve Nanus, B. (2005). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Collins Business Essentials. Bolman, L. G. ve Deal, T. E. (2011). Leading with Soul: An Uncommon Journey of Spirit. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. Brown, R. (2016, March 07). How to re-ignite the spark in a disengaged employee. http://www.hrmonline.com.au/section/featured/how-to-re-engage-an-employee/ Erişim tarihi 20.08.2018
  6. Byham, T. M. ve Wellins, R. S. (2015). Your First Leadership Job: How Catalyst Leaders Bring Out the Best in Others. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Chang, R. (2001). The Passion Plan at Work: Building a Passion Driven Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1): 64-73.
  7. Colan, L. (2014, January 29). 3 ways to spark employee passion. https://www.inc.com/lee-colan/3-ways-to-spark-employee-passion.html Erişim tarihi 20.08.2018
  8. Daft, R.L. (2003). Management. USA: South Western. Denning, S. (2014, October 08). Debunking myths about worker passion. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2014/10/08/debunking-myths-about-worker-passion/#c30b2b08f4bc. Erişim tarihi 30.08.2018
  9. DeRue, D. S. ve Workman, K. M. (2012). Toward a positive and dynamic theory of leadership development. In G. M. Spreitzer & K. S. Cameron (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  10. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale Development: Th